|Table of Contents|

Seasonal Differences in the Response to Nitrogen Utilization in the Protected-field Lettuce Production

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年12
Page:
55-62
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Seasonal Differences in the Response to Nitrogen Utilization in the Protected-field Lettuce Production
Author(s):
ZHANG Can1; FAN Hui1; LIANG Bin2; CHEN Qing1
(1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention-control and Remediation/College of Resource and Environmental Sciences,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193;2.College of Resource and Environmental Sciences,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao,Shandong 266109)
Keywords:
N application; lettuce; production; nitrogen utilization; seasonal variation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20184050
Abstract:
Excessive nitrogen (N) fertilizer input had resulted in accumulation of mineral N and reduced yield and quality of the lettuce planted in the protected-field.However,the response of lettuce to N fertilizer application rates varied with the different seasons.In the present study,field experiments including two nitrogen application levels (223,343 kg?hm-2N) in autumn-winter season and three nitrogen application levels (91,183,366 kg?hm-2 N) in spring season were conducted to evaluate the effect of seasonal variation and nitrogen application rates on lettuce yield,nutrient uptake and soil mineral N level.The results showed that the economic yields and shoot biomass of the lettuce increased up to the peak and then declined with the progressive increased N fertilizer applied rate.For 1 t lettuce production,the N and K uptake were 1.90 kg and 4.69 kg in autumn-winter season and 1.38 kg and 2.87 kg in spring season,respectively.Reducing applied N rate effectively decreased the soil residual mineral nitrogen in the two seasons of lettuce production.However,the nitrogen transformation rate was lower in autumn-winter season which led to higher soil residual NH+4-N level.The decreased nitrogen fertilizer effectively reduced the accumulation of soil inorganic nitrogen in two seasons.In this study,the reasonable nitrogen application for lettuce ranged from 120-150 kg?hm-2N under drip-irrigated condition,with relatively high rate in spring season,other than in autumn-winter season.

References:

[1]巨晓棠.氮肥有效率的概念及意义：兼论对传统氮肥利用率的理解误区[J].土壤学报,2014,51(5):921-933.[2]吴建繁.北京市无公害蔬菜诊断施肥与环境效应研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2001.[3]邱炜红,刘金山,胡承孝,等.不同施氮水平对菜地土壤N2O排放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(11):2238-2243.[4]易琼,黄旭,张木,等.氮肥施用水平及种类对生菜产量及菜地N2O排放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(10):2019-2025.[5]王柳.京郊日光温室土壤环境特征与黄瓜优质高产相关性的研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2003.[6]FAN Z,LIN S,ZHANG X,et al.Conventional flooding irrigation causes an overuse of nitrogen fertilizer and low nitrogen use efficiency in intensively used solar greenhouse vegetable production[J].Agricultural Water Management,2014,144(2):11-19.[7]余泺.施氮对可变电荷土壤中硝酸根离子和盐基离子耦合迁移的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2012.[8]葛晓光,王晓雪,付亚文,等.长期定位施用氮肥对菜田土壤肥力变化的影响[J].中国蔬菜,1997(5):1-6.[9]HAYNES R J.Movement and transformations of fertigatied nitrogen below trickle emitters and their effects on pH in the wetted soil volume[J].Fertilizer Research,1990,23:105-112.[10]KANG L Y,FAN B Q,CHEN S,et al.Fertigation combined with catch crop maximize vegetable yield and minimize N and P surplus[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2018,112(1):87-99.[11]张晓晟.京郊地区集约化蔬菜生产中氮素综合管理系统的建立和应用[D].北京:中国农业大学,2005.[12]雷宝坤,张维理,段宗颜,等.滇池流域设施条件下生菜氮磷减控研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,27(1):55-59.[13]陈健,李卫勇,王志强.生菜氮肥施用效应与经济效益分析[J].现代农业科技,2014(1):104-105.[14]孙旭霞,薛玉花,伍晓华.氮肥水平对生菜产量及品质的影响研究[J].北方园艺,2009(8):100-101.[15]赵凤艳,魏自民,陈翠玲.氮肥用量对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J].土壤与作物,2001,17(1):43-44.[16]康跃虎.实用型滴灌灌溉计划制定方法[J].节水灌溉,2004(3):11-14.[17]SORENSEN J N.Use of the Nmin-method for optimization of vegetable nitrogen nutrition[C]//Acta Horticulturae,1993,339:179-192.[18]SOUZA R S D,REZENDE R,HACHMANN T L,et al.Lettuce production in a greenhouse under fertigation with nitrogen and potassium silicate[J].Acta Sci Agron,2017,39(2):211-216.[19]林俊杰,张帅,刘丹,等.季节性温度升高对落干期消落带土壤氮矿化影响[J].环境科学,2016(2):697-702.[20]陆扣萍,谢寅峰,闵炬,等.不同施氮量对大棚莴苣根系形态及产量和品质的影响[J].土壤,2011,43(4):542-547.[21]LOPES M S,REYNOLDS M P.Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat[J].Functional Plant Biology,2010,37(2):147-156.[22]汪建飞,邢素芝,吴娟娟.施用氮肥对生菜氮、磷、钾营养代谢的影响[J].安徽科技学院学报,2002,16(3):1-5.[23]田霄鸿,王朝辉.不同氮素形态及配比对蔬菜生长和品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),1999,27(2):6-10.[24]CHEN S,YAN Z J,CHEN Q.Estimating the potential to reduce potassium surplus in intensive vegetable fields of China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2017,107(2):265-277.[25]王玉霞.低温条件下氮素形态对烤烟生理代谢及产量和品质的影响[D].福建:福建农林大学,2016.[26]樊军,郝明德.旱地农田土壤剖面硝态氮累积的原因初探[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(3):263-266.[27]王士超,周建斌,陈竹君,等.温度对不同年限日光温室土壤氮素矿化特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(1):121-127.[28]巨晓棠,李生秀.土壤氮素矿化的温度水分效应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(1):37-42.[29]龚雪文,刘浩,孙景生,等.不同水分下限对温室膜下滴灌甜瓜开花坐果期地温的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):2935-2943.[30]范晓晖,朱兆良.旱地土壤中的硝化-反硝化作用[J].土壤通报,2002,33(5):385-391.[31]张树兰,杨学云,吕殿青,等温度、水分及不同氮源对土壤硝化作用的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2147-2153.[32]张英鹏,林咸永,章永松,等.不同氮形态对菠菜生长及体内抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].浙江大学学报,2006,32(2):139-144.[33]王波,王梅农,赖涛,等.不同氮形态营养对生菜光合特性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2007,30(4):74-77.[34]邱志平,杨其长,刘文科.氮素形态和水平对生菜生长、叶片光合色素及营养液中根分泌物累积的影响[C]//寿光：中国寿光国际设施园艺高层学术论坛,2013.[35]张文波.氮肥对生菜产量、品质和土壤环境效应影响研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2004.[36]侯迷红,李玉明,姚锦秋,等.不同氮素形态及其配比对叶类蔬菜生长和品质的影响[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2016(2):137-140.[37]吴振强.不同氮源营养液配方对生菜中硝酸盐和Vc含量的影响[J].福建农业科技,2009(6):65-66.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-07-17