|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Urban and Rural Integration Levels in Five Northwest Provinces and Countermeasures Under the Background of Rural Revitalization

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年19
Page:
136-143
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Urban and Rural Integration Levels in Five Northwest Provinces and Countermeasures Under the Background of Rural Revitalization
Author(s):
YONG Hui1; 2; 3; YANG Dan3
(1.Postdoctoral Research Station，Peking University，Beijing 100871；2.Postdoctoral Mobile Station，Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，Beijing 100191；3.College of Economic and Management，Shihezi University，Shihezi,Xinjiang 832003)
Keywords:
urban-rural integration; five provinces of the northwest; rural revitalization; evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20183653
Abstract:
The urban-rural dual structure is an important obstacle to the realization of rural revitalization.Promoting the development of urban and rural integration plays an important role in promoting urban and rural mutual promotion，mutual promotion of industry and agriculture，and rural development.The northwest is still faced with a relatively obvious gap on the level of urban-rural development for for natural environment，geographical location，economic basis and or so for a long time.Based on panel data from year 2000 to 2016，the evaluation system of urban-rural integration indicators was constructed from four aspects of urban-rural space，economy，society，and ecological environment.Then，the urban-rural integration level in the five provinces of northwest China by using GPCA was evaluated and analyzed.The results showed that the level of urban-rural integration in the five provinces of northwest China was increasing steadily from year 2000 to 2016，and there were obvious inter-provincial gaps among provinces；In 2014，the northwest has caught up with the national average level，but there was still a large gap with the eastern district；Different provinces had different advantages and disadvantages in the four dimensions of urban-rural integration.According to the differences of the five provinces，combined with Chinese rural revitalization strategy，the paper proposes suggestions to promote the integration of urban-rural development in the northwest.

References:

[1]叶兴庆.以改革创新促进乡村振兴[N].经济日报,2017-12-28(001).[2]陈雯.“城乡一体化”内涵的讨论[J].现代经济探讨,2003(5):16-18.[3]张强.中国城乡一体化发展的研究与探索[J].中国农村经济,2013(1):15-23.[4]黄祖辉.准确把握中国乡村振兴战略[J].中国农村经济,2018(4):2-12.[5]杨荣南.城乡一体化及其评价指标体系初探[J].城市研究,1997(2):20-24.[6]完世伟.城乡一体化评价指标体系的构建及应用:以河南省为例[J].经济经纬,2008(4):60-63.[7]焦必方,林娣,彭婧妮.城乡一体化评价体系的全新构建及其应用:长三角地区城乡一体化评价[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2011(4):75-83.[8]朱金鹤,崔登峰.新疆城乡一体化进程的影响因素与评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(12):22-27.[9]周江燕,白永秀.中国省域城乡发展一体化水平:理论与测度[J].中国农村经济,2014(6):16-26,40.[10]魏博通,王圣云.中部地区城乡一体化的省区差异及推进策略:基于2000—2013年的面板数据[J].湖北社会科学,2016(5):58-63.[11]杨建涛,王艳华,高建华.基于ANP-TOPSIS的中国城乡一体化发展测度研究[J].经济经纬,2016,33(1):42-47.[12]汪宇明,刘高,施加仓,蔡萌.中国城乡一体化水平的省区分异[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2012,22(4):137-142.[13]汤春玲,马跃如.基于直觉模糊的中国省域城乡一体化水平测度[J].经济地理,2016,36(10):52-59.[14]修春亮,许大明,祝翔凌.东北地区城乡一体化进程评估[J].地理科学,2004(3):320-325.[15]李秉文,付春香.甘肃城乡一体化:现状评价与路径选择:基于卢曼“一般社会系统理论”的分析视角[J].甘肃社会科学,2012(2):83-86.[16]蔡瑞林,陈万明,岳丹丹.基于因子分析的江苏城乡一体化发展研究[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(4):414-417.[17]石忆邵.城乡一体化理论与实践:回眸与评析[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(1):49-54,96.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-09