|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Catch Crops on Cucumber Growth and Soil Properties

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年19
Page:
1-6
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Catch Crops on Cucumber Growth and Soil Properties
Author(s):
XIE Hua1LIU Houze2TAO Wangxin1CHENG Yizhi1WU Fengzhi1
(1.College of Horticultural and Landscape Architecture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030;2.College of Economic and Trade,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030)
Keywords:
cucumbergrowth indexyieldchemical properties
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20182596
Abstract:
Scallion,oilseed rape and wheat were used as catch crops.We used the pots to plant and set up regular leisure (CK),winter leisure period catch scallions(QC),winter leisure period to fill the oilseed rape (YC) and summer leisure period to wheat cover crop (XM).7-year-old continuous cropping cucumber soil was treated with four treatments to investigate the effects of different cover modes on cucumber growth,yield per plant and soil chemical properties,with a aim to provide the basis and support for creating a good ecological environment and selecting appropriate planting systems.The results showed that compared with regular leisure (CK),wheat cover crop (XM) significantly increased the plant height of cucumber,and scallion treatment (QC) significantly increased cucumber stem diameter,while XM and YC treatment increased cucumber yield by 17.7% and 16.7%, respectively.At the same time,the soil pH was significantly increased,and the soil electrical conductivity (EC) and soil available nitrogen content were significantly reduced by each treatment,and the XM effect was the most significant.Overall,the cover mode promoted the growth of cucumber and played a positive role in preventing and controlling continuous cropping obstacles.

References:

[1]吴凤芝,周新刚.黄瓜连作障碍研究进展[J].大豆科学,2013(6):805.[2]ZHOU X G,GAO D M,LIU J,et al.Changes in rhizosphere soil microbial communities in a continuously monocropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) system[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2014,60:1-8.[3]蔡桂荣,孙爱武.设施蔬菜连作障碍的发生机制及防治措施[J].吉林蔬菜,2007(3):49-50.[4]刘长泰,孙国清.设施蔬菜连作障碍的原因及防治措施[J].现代农业科技,2014(24):177-178.[5]朱训永.设施蔬菜连作障碍的原因浅析及治理对策[J].农产品加工(创新版),2012(1):65-67.[6]吴凤芝,赵凤艳.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J].东北农业大学学报,2000,31(3):241-247.[7]徐炜民,顾洪卫.设施蔬菜连作障碍综合治理对策[J].中国园艺文摘,2009,25(11):104-105.[8]魏晓明,赵银平,杨瑞平.设施西瓜连作障碍及防治措施研究进展[J].中国瓜菜,2016,29(9):1-5.[9]CONSTANTIN J,MARY B,LAURENT F,et al.Effects of catch crops,no till and reduced nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen leaching and balance in three long-term experiments[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2010,135:268-278.[10]田永强,高丽红.填闲作物阻控设施菜田土壤功能衰退研究进展[J].中国蔬菜,2012,1(18):26-35.[11]李敏,吴凤芝.不同填闲模式对黄瓜根际土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(12):3556-3562.[12]吴凤芝,潘凯,刘守伟.设施土壤修复及连作障碍克服技术[J].中国蔬菜,2013(13):39.[13]彭亚静,郝晓然,吉艳芝,等.填闲种植对棚室菜田累积氮素消减及黄瓜生长的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1774-1784.[14]周新刚.连作黄瓜土壤生态环境特征及对黄瓜生长的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2011.[15]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2005.[16]陈少灿,吴凤芝.轮作分蘖洋葱对大白菜生长、品质及产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2015(12):31-34.[17]THOMSEN I K.Nitrate leaching under spring barley is influenced by the presence of a ryegrass catch crop:Results from a lysimeter experiment[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2005,111:21-29.[18]郭晓.不同填闲植物对连作黄瓜生长及土壤生态环境的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2014.[19]吴艳飞,张雪艳,李元,等.轮作对黄瓜连作土壤环境和产量的影响[J].园艺学报,2008,35(3):357-362.[20]GAO D M,ZHOU X G,DUAN Y D,et al.Wheat cover crop promoted cucumber seedling growth through regulating soil nutrient resources or soil microbial communities[J].Plant & Soil,2017,418(1-2):1-17.[21]张雪艳,田永强,高丽红,等.长期采用不同栽培方式和栽培制度对土壤环境的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2011,1(22):38-44.[22]张雪艳,田蕾,高艳明,等.填闲大豆秸秆还田对黄瓜连作土壤化学指标的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(7):104-112.[23]王旭晖,张雪艳,吴艳飞,等.不同栽培制度对连作黄瓜温室土壤长期修复效果的研究[J].中国蔬菜,2011,1(22):78-83.[24]HUANG H C,CHOU C H,ERICKSON R S.Soil sickness and its control[J].Allelopathy Journal,2006,18(1):1-22.[25]文方芳,韩宝,于跃跃,等.4种填闲作物对设施菜田土壤次生盐渍化的改良效果[J].中国农技推广,2015,31(4):44-46.[26]张敏.生物炭对污染农田土壤理化性质及重金属有效性的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.[27]吴凤芝,郭晓,刘守伟,等.夏季填闲对连作黄瓜根区土壤酶活性及土壤化学性状的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2014(10):29-34.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-10-09