|Table of Contents|

Moderate Scale of Farmer Cultivated Land Management Under the Constraint of Carbon Emission

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年09
Page:
184-190
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Moderate Scale of Farmer Cultivated Land Management Under the Constraint of Carbon Emission
Author(s):
DUAN YuehongWANG ZhibinWEI Jiaxing
(College of Economics and Management,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100)
Keywords:
moderate scale of farmer cultivated land managementcarbon emissionSBM-Undesirable modelChangwu county in Shaanxi Province
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20182451
Abstract:
The moderate scale of land management is an important way to increase income,food production and realize land ecology.In order to guide the production practice more scientifically and reasonably,the moderate scale of farmer cultivated land management was measured by SBM-Undesirable model under carbon emissions were incorporated into the system of measuring the moderate scale of cultivated land,based on 252 questionnaires in Changwu county of Shaanxi Province.The results showed that under constraint of carbon emission,the moderate scale of farmer cultivated land management was 1.20-1.53 hectares in Changwu county of Shaanxi Province.Carbon emission had a negative constraint on the moderate scale of cultivated land,the moderate scale of farmer cultivated land management with carbon emission constraint was smaller than non-constraint of carbon emission.The scale of farmer cultivated land management was affected by many factors,the family risk preference,the degree of agricultural irrigation convenience,the cognition of carbon emission of cultivated land and management right transfer had significant positive effects on the moderate scale of farmer cultivated land management.The number of plots and joining agricultural cooperatives negatively affect the moderate scale of farmer cultivated land management.

References:

[1]孔祥智.健全农业社会化服务体系 实现小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接[J].农业经济与管理,2017(5):20-22.[2]罗丹,李文明,陈洁.粮食生产经营的适度规模:产出与效益二维视角[J].管理世界,2017(1):78-88.[3]马增林,余志刚.不同社会经济目标下的黑龙江省土地适度经营规模实证研究[J].商业研究,2012(9):145-150.[4]宋戈,邹朝晖,陈藜藜.基于双重目标的东北粮食主产区土地适度规模经营研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(8):38-46.[5]李文明,罗丹,陈洁,等.农业适度规模经营:规模效益、产出水平与生产成本:基于1552个水稻种植户的调查数据[J].中国农村经济,2015(3):4-17.[6]李颖,黄贤金,甄峰.江苏省区域不同土地利用方式的碳排放效应分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(S2):102-107.[7]李波,张俊飚,李海鹏.中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2011,21(8):80-86.[8]汪文雄,余利红,刘凌览,等.农地整治效率评价研究:基于标杆管理和DEA模型[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2014,24(6):103-113.[9]杨清可,段学军,叶磊,等.基于SBM-Undesirable模型的城市土地利用效率评价:以长三角地区16城市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(4):712-721.[10]吴昊玥,何艳秋,陈柔.中国农业碳排放绩效评价及随机性收敛研究:基于SBM-Undesirable模型与面板单位根检验[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(9):1381-1391.[11]杨良杰,吴威,苏勤,等.基于SBM-Undesirable模型的1997—2010年中国公路运输效率评价[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(11):1602-1611.[12]卢新海,匡兵,李菁.碳排放约束下耕地利用效率的区域差异及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(4),657-668.[13]吴贤荣,张俊飚,田云,等.中国省域农业碳排放:测算、效率变动及影响因素研究:基于DEA-Malmquist指数分解方法与Tobit模型运用[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):129-138.[14]张忠明,钱文荣.农户土地经营规模与粮食生产效率关系实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(8):52-58.[15]孔令成,郑少锋.家庭农场的经营效率及适度规模:基于松江模式的DEA模型分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(5):107-118.[16]高雪萍,檀竹平.基于DEA-Tobit模型粮食主产区家庭农场经营效率及其影响因素分析[J].农林经济管理学报,2015,14(6):577-584.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-06-14