|Table of Contents|

Contribution of Technical Training on Production Efficiency of The Melon Household

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年12
Page:
1-6
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Contribution of Technical Training on Production Efficiency of The Melon Household
Author(s):
XIE Wenbao;  LIU Guoyong
(School of Economics and Business, Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052)
Keywords:
technical training;  production efficiency;  propensity score matching;  stochastic frontier analysis;  household
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20174674
Abstract:
In order to explore the contribution of agricultural technology training to farmers’ production efficiency, based on survey data of melon production in Xinjiang, taking account of the sample self-selectivity and endogeneity of farmer participation in technical training, the propensity score matching mathod was used to study the contribution of agricultural technical training and frequency of participation on output performance and technical efficiency of households. The results showed that the production of melon in Xinjiang was labor-intensive, the current agricultural technology training preferred to be capital-saving. The agricultural technology training significantly improved the land productivity and technical efficiency of farmers, with the contribution rates of 20.869% and 8.892% respectively, the contribution rates of technical efficiency frequency were 20.616% and 11.518% respectively, indicating that the frequency of technical training further increased the production efficiency of farmers, while the contribution to labor productivity was insignificant. The neglect of farmers’ participation in technical training and frequency selective and endogenous problems, the contribution rates would be overestimated.

References:

 

[1] 张娟. 农民培训产品的属性探析[J]. 农业经济,2007(8):67-68.

[2] 谢文宝,刘国勇. 基于随机前沿分析的新疆甜瓜生产技术效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 北方园艺,2015(20):197-200.

[3] 周曙东,王艳,朱思柱. 中国花生种植户生产技术效率及影响因素分析:基于全国19个省份的农户微观数据[J]. 中国农村经济,2013(3):27-36.

[4] 杨万江,李琪. 我国农户水稻生产技术效率分析:基于11省761户调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济,2016(1):71-81.

[5] 王清清,郑少锋. 陕西猕猴桃种植户技术效率及影响因素分析[J]. 北方园艺,2017(18):197-204.

[6] 杨万江,李琪. 我国农户水稻生产技术效率分析:基于11省761户调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济,2016(1):71-81.

[7] 王玺. 农户技术效率差异及影响因素实证分析:基于随机前沿生产函数与果农微观数据[J]. 经济问题,2011(6):72-77.

[8] AKUNO W, ONYANGO C, OBARA J. Influence of farmer FFS approach on the acquisition of knowledge, skills for agricultural productivity in the lake victoria region, Kenya[J]. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 2014, 18(1):162-180.

[9] SADDOZAI K N, SABOOR A, KHAN M A, et al. Analyzing the impact of farmer field school on technical efficiency of cotton growers in southern districts of Punjab-Pakistan: stochastic production frontier approach.[J]. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 29(2):291-298.

[10]周宏,夏秋,朱晓莉. 农业技术推广到位水平对超级稻产量及技术效率贡献研究[J]. 农业技术经济,2014(9):14-21.

[11]项诚,贾相平,黄季焜,等. 农业技术培训对农户氮肥施用行为的影响:基于山东省寿光市玉米生产的实证研究[J]. 农业技术经济,2012(9):4-10.

[12] 李莎莎,马骥. 不同技术培训主体的效果评估及政策启示:以测土配方施肥为例[J]. 科技与经济,2015(3):50-54.

[13] 高升. 农户参加培训决策行为的影响因素:基于湖南1040户农户的调查[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2011(4):21-26.

[14] 赵帮宏,张亮,张润清. 新型农民培训影响因素的实证考察[J]. 统计与决策,2010(11):89-92.

[15] 于敏. 现代农业背景下农民生产技能培训需求意愿及制约因素分析:基于宁波511个种养农户的调查[J]. 经济问题探索,2010(2):61-67.

[16] 李恩,张志坚,李飞. 影响农民参加农业技术培训行为因素的分析:基于长春市郊区的调查数据[J]. 管理学刊,2012(3):66-72.

[17] 何安华,刘同山,孔祥智. 农户异质性对农业技术培训参与的影响[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境,2014(3):116-123.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-05-02