|Table of Contents|

Comprehensive Application of AHP Method and SBE Method in  Plant Landscape Evaluation

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年11
Page:
110-117
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comprehensive Application of AHP Method and SBE Method in  Plant Landscape Evaluation
Author(s):
SHEN Wen; LI Kai; WANG Xiurong
(College of Forestry,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025)
Keywords:
AHP; SBE; Kendall′s W coefficient; plant landscape evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20174559
Abstract:
Quantitative evaluation system of plant landscape has been arousing heated discussion among scholars worldwide.However,as the limitation of subjective evaluation process,deviation mostly happens in the results when different methods are employed.30 plant landscape units were taken as the case study,and comprehensive application of Analytic Hierarchy Process（AHP） and Scenic Beauty Estimation（SBE） was adopted in order to overcome the one-sidedness of using a single method.The results showed that evaluation index system of plant landscape based on AHP were made up by criteria layer indexes consisting of aesthetic constitution,cultural expression,psychological perception,and 12 factor layer indexes such as plant color,plant morphology and texture et al.Evaluation results of AHP and SBE had relatively high consistency.Units with high grades based on SBE tended to be of aesthetic constitution,while those based on AHP tended to be balanced in all aspects.More correct results were obtained based on comprehensive application of 2 methods.

References:

 

[1]徐岩岩,卓丽环.哈尔滨居住区植物景观评价[J].天津城市建设学院学报,2008,14(1):11-14.

[2]菅文娜,张延龙.陕西关中城市街道园林绿化景观模糊评价[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(3):147-149.

[3]吉杨婷,李燕妮,陈为,等.成都市城市公园滨水植物景观评价[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):291-297.

[4]翁殊斐,柯峰,黎彩敏.用AHP法和SBE法研究广州公园植物景观单元[J].中国园林,2009,25(4):78-81.

[5]薛桂萍,程辉,张星,等.多种评价方法在农业气象灾情评价中的综合应用[J].中国农业气象,2008(3):361-364.

[6]文余源,胡鹏.多种评价方法在投资环境评价中的综合应用[J].经济地理,2002(4):390-393.

[7]孙明,杜小玉,杨炜茹.北京市公园绿地植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(S1):163-167.

[8]宋爱春,董丽,晏海.基于AHP的北京地区观赏海棠景观价值评价[J].中国园林,2013,29(6):65-70.

[9]唐丽红,马明睿,韩华,等.上海市景观水体水生植物现状及配置评价[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(3):563-570.

[10]曾凤,李许文,胡晓敏,等.广州白云山典型景区园林植物群落景观评价[J].中国园林,2014,30(8):97-101.

[11]宁惠娟,邵锋,孙茜茜,等.基于AHP法的杭州花港观鱼公园植物景观评价[J].浙江农业学报,2011,23(4):717-724.

[12]郜春丽,翁殊斐,赵宝玉.基于AHP法的滨水绿道植物景观评价体系构建[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(3):206-209.

[13]陈晓刚,罗奇.城市住宅区园林植物景观评价[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(6):999-1003.

[14]陆东芳.大学校园植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].福建林学院学报,2008(4):328-332.

[15]DANIEL T C,MEITNER M.Representational validity of landscape visualizations:The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest of vistas[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2001,21(1):61-72.

[16]郭先华,赵千钧,崔胜辉,等.丽江城市不同区域景观美学[J].生态学报,2014,34(7):1794-1799.

[17]杨鑫霞,亢新刚,杜志,等.基于SBE法的长白山森林景观美学评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(6):86-90,98.

[18]邵锋,宁惠娟,包志毅,等.城市公园植物景观量化评价研究[J].浙江农林大学学报,2012,29(3):359-365.

[19]刘瑞雪,马贤明.深圳市城市公园植物景观构成与美景度研究[J].中国城市林业,2016,14(6):13-17.

[20]梁叶,陈椽,晏妮,等.花溪城市湿地公园气生和亚气生藻类多样性分析[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(18):3991-3994,3998.

[21]张庆辉,赵捷,朱晋,等.中国城市湿地公园研究现状[J].湿地科学,2013,11(1):129-135.

[22]徐燕,张忠富.国家城市湿地公园旅游者行为特征分析:以贵阳市花溪十里河滩湿地公园为例[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(36):243-246.

[23]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.关于公布第六批国家城市湿地公园的通知(建城[2009]277号)[Z].2009.

[24]李效文,贾黎明,郝小飞,等.森林景观SBE评价方法[J].中国城市林业,2007(3):33-36.

[25]DANIEL T C,BOSTER R S.Measuring landscape esthetics:The scenic beauty estimation method[M].Fort Collins,Colo:Rocky Mtn Forest and Range Exp,1976:1-66.

[26]唐东芹,杨学军,许东新.园林植物景观评价方法及其应用[J].浙江林学院学报,2001(4):64-67.

[27]西格尔S.非参数统计[M].北星，译.北京:科学出版社,1986:266-276.

[28]董建文,翟明普,章志都,等.福建省山地坡面风景游憩林单因素美景度评价研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(6):154-158.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-06-29