|Table of Contents|

Comparative Karyotype Analyses of Erythronium Species in China

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年11
Page:
89-93
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Karyotype Analyses of Erythronium Species in China
Author(s):
YIN Genshen1ZHAI Shuhua1LIU Kaiqing2CHEN Ziniu1
(1.Key Laboratory of Special Biological Resource Development and Utilization of Universities in Yunnan Province,Kunming University,Kunming,Yunnan 650214;2.Science Department,Kunming University,Kunming,Yunnan 650214)
Keywords:
Erythronium sibiricumdysploidcentric fusioncomparative karyotype analyses
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20174400
Abstract:
Two domestic species of Erythronium L.(E. sibiricum,E.japonicum) and one exotic species(E.dens-canis L.)were used as research object.Using the method of karyotypic comparation,the karyotypes of four samples were investigated to trace the origin of dysploid of E. sibiricum.The results showed Ⅰ and Ⅱ chromosomes of E.sibiricum were metacentric chromosomes,and E.sibiricum had the largest interchromosomal asymmetry but the least intrachromosomal asymmetry.All these results indicated that centric fusion was probably the main mechanism underlying the origin of dysploid in E.sibiricum.

References:

 

[1]TAKHTAJAN A.Flowering plants[M].New York:Springer,2009.

[2]CHEN X Q,LIANG S Y,XU J M.Flora of China (vol.24)[M].Beijing:Science Press,2000.

[3]蔡恩博,赵岩,杨智慧,等.猪牙花乙醇提取物抑菌活性、抗氧化作用及猪牙花中微量元素的测定[J].食品科学,2010,31(17):60-63.

[4]古丽江·贾曼拜,何春霞,古力西拉·沙菩西,等.新疆猪牙花生物学特性研究[J].新疆林业,2012,37(2):17-19.

[5]张博文,张卫东.猪牙花苗木繁育技术研究[J].吉林农业,2015,26(5):89.

[6]谭敦炎,张震,李新蓉,等.老鸦瓣属(百合科)的恢复:以形态性状的分支分析为依据[J].植物分类学报,2005,43(3):262-270.

[7]谭敦炎.中国郁金香属(广义)的系统学研究[D].北京:中国科学院,2005.

[8]RUDALL P J,CONRAN J G,CHASE M W.Systematics of ruscaceae/convallariaceae:a combined morphological and molecular investigation[J].Botanical Journal of The Linnean Society,2000,134(1-2):73-92.

[9]UTECH F H,KAWANO S.Biosystematic studies in Erythronium (Liliaceae-Tulipeae):III.Somatic karyotype analysis of E.japonicum Decne[J].Cytologia,1976,41(3-4):749-755.

[10]GOLDBLATT P,JOHNSON D E.Index to plant chromosome numbers[M].St.Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden,1979.

[11]YIN G S,YANG Z Y,CHIANG T Y,et al.Tracing the origin of the bimodal karyotypes of the tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) based on comparative karyotype analyses[J].Plant Diversity and Resources,2014,36(6):737-746.

[12]洪德元.植物细胞分类学[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.

[13]LEVIN D A.The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2002.

[14]CARDOSO D C,das GRAAS POMPOLO S,CRISTIANO M P,et al.The role of fusion in ant chromosome evolution:Insights from cytogenetic analysis using a molecular phylogenetic approach in the genus Mycetophylax[J/OL].PLoS one,2014,9(1):e87473.

[15]RANE V A,PATEL B B,GEORGE J.Karyotype analysis of ten species of Ipomoea Jacq.[J].Cytologia,2012,77(2):239-249.

[16]牛凯,许正,丘佳丽,等.新疆十种野生药用植物核型分析[J].北方园艺,2016(8):159-163.

[17]PERUZZI L,EROGLU H.Karyotype asymmetry:Again,how to measure and what to measure?[J].Comparative Cytogenetics,2013,7(1):1-9.

[18]ZAHAROF E.Karyotype variation of Fritillaria graeca and F.davisii from Greece[J].Nordic Journal of Botany,1989,9(4):367-373.

[19]CHAUHAN K,BRANDHAM P.The significance of Robertsonian fusion and monosomy in Cardiocrinum (Liliaceae)[J].Kew Bulletin,1985,40(3):567-571.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-06-29