|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Tomato Quality， Soil Nutrient and Soil Temperature

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年09
Page:
133-138
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Tomato Quality， Soil Nutrient and Soil Temperature
Author(s):
ZHAO Wei1; TANG Lei1; YANG Yuanyuan1; ZHANG Feng2; YANG Zhaosen1; CHEN Zhijie2
(1.Weinan Agricultural Technology Promotion Center，Weinan,Shaanxi 714000;2.Shaanxi Institute of Biological Agriculture，Xi′an,Shaanxi 710043)
Keywords:
irrigation methods; facilities tomato; quality; soil temperature; soil electrical conductivity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20173509
Abstract:
A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of different irrigation methods on tomato quality，soil nutrient and soil temperature under plastic greenhouse.Four irrigation methods were set，respectively，for furrow irrigation under mulch (G1)，drip irrigation under mulch (G2)，alternative furrow irrigation (G3) and common furrow irrigation (G4).The results showed that there was no significant difference in tomato yield，reducing sugar content，total acid content，sugar/acid ratio，vitamin C content and soluble solids content of tomato among different irrigation methods.Compared with the air temperature，the daily average temperature of soil at 15 cm underground under different irrigation methods was improved，especially in the case of low air temperature.Compared with G3，the other three irrigation methods significantly improved the daily average temperature of soil at 15 cm underground by 2 ℃.Soil organic matter content in G3 (27.1 mg?kg-1) was significantly higher than other irrigation methods.The mineral nitrogen leaching was significantly reduced in G2 and G3.Therefore，we concluded that drip irrigation under mulch and alternative furrow irrigation methods were suitable for tomato cultivation in facilities.

References:

 

[1]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2014.

[2]李建明,邹志荣,王晓燕.蔬菜节水灌溉指标的研究现状及存在问题[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(2):118-123.

[3]王旭,孙兆军,杨军,等.几种节水灌溉新技术应用现状与研究进展[J].节水灌溉,2016(10):109-113.

[4]王忠鹏,成自勇,张芮,等.膜下滴灌水分调控对番茄产量影响和经济效益评价的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(3):30-34.

[5]张栓堂,焦艳平,王福田,等.温室番茄不同灌水方式试验研究[J].节水灌溉,2016(10):59-63.

[6]王燕,蔡焕杰,陈新明,等.不同灌水方式下番茄节水高产机理研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(2):261-265.

[7]NURUDDIN M M,MADRAMOOTOO C A,DODDS G T.Effects of water stress at different growth stages on greenhouse tomato yield and quality[J].Hort Science,2003,38(7):1389-1393.

[8]李建明,潘铜华,王玲慧,等.水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(10):82-90.

[9]邱渊,赵连圆,胡田田,等.水肥供应对番茄生长及产量形成的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(2):245-251.

[10]姬景红,张玉龙,张玉玲,等.不同灌溉方法对保护地土壤有机质及氮素影响的研究[J].土壤通报,2007,38(6):1105-1109.

[11]黄红荣,李建明,张军,等.滴灌条件下水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量和干物质分配的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(7):6-12.

[12]高方胜,徐坤,徐立功,等.土壤水分对番茄生长发育及产量品质的影响[J].西北农业学报,2005,14(4):69-72.

[13]杨再强,邱译萱,刘朝霞,等.土壤水分胁迫对设施番茄根系及地上部生长的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(3):748-757.

[14]牛云慧,曹红霞,石小虎,等.水分亏缺对温室番茄生长发育及生理特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2013,32(4):69-72.

[15]COOLONG T,SURENDRAN S,WARNER R.Evaluation of irrigation threshold and duration for tomato grown in a silt loam soil[J].Hort Technology,2011,21(4):466-473.

[16]杨慧,曹红霞,柳美玉,等.水氮耦合条件下番茄临界氮浓度模型的建立及氮素营养诊断[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(5):1234-1242.

[17]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.

[18]罗勤,陈竹君,闫波,等.水肥减量对日光温室土壤水分状况及番茄产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(2):449-157.

[19]吕望,牛文全,古君,等.微润管埋深与密度对日光温室番茄产量及品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(12):1663-1673.

[20]唐丽,张泽锦,李跃建.膜下滴灌水量对避雨栽培番茄产量和品质的影响[J].节水灌溉,2015(12):44-47.

[21]张西超,邹洪涛,张玉龙,等.灌溉方法对设施土壤理化性质及番茄生长状况的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):143-148.

[22]刘小刚,张彦,张富仓,等.交替灌溉下不同水氮供应对番茄产量和品质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):283-287.

[23]申孝军,孙景生,李明思,等.不同灌溉方式对覆膜棉田土壤温度的影响[J].节水灌溉,2011(11):19-24.

[24]李萌,虎胆·吐马尔白,张江辉，等.不同水分处理下香梨地土壤温度变化特征的研究[J].节水灌溉,2015(8):29-33.

[25]周娜娜,王刚.水肥耦合条件下马铃薯产量和NO3-N动态变化研究[J].琼州大学学报,2005,12(5):49-51.

[26]漆栋良,胡田田.灌水施氮方式对玉米生育期土壤NO3-N时空分布的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(2):279-287.

[27]朱成立,刘宗潇,翟亚明,等.滨海农区微咸水-淡水交替灌溉对土壤EC和入渗的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2017,38(1):154-160.

[28]陈小芹,王振华,何新林,等.北疆棉田不同冬灌方式对土壤水分、盐分和温度分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):132-137.

[29]张玉龙,张继宁,张恒明,等.保护地蔬菜栽培不同灌水方法对表层土壤盐分含量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2003,22(1):40-43.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-05-24