|Table of Contents|

Physiological and Ecological Impacts of Urban Green Plants Under  Air Pollution Anhui Province

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年10
Page:
127-135
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological and Ecological Impacts of Urban Green Plants Under  Air Pollution Anhui Province
Author(s):
WANG TaoyuanZHU Zhiguo
(Institute of Landscape Gardening,Wuhu Vocational Technical College,Wuhu,Anhui 241003)
Keywords:
Anhui Provinceair pollutiongreen plantsphysiological and ecological characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20173301
Abstract:
Physiological and ecological impacts of four urban green plants in air polluted cities in Anhui Province were compared by using the method of indoor culture.The results showed that the sequence of integrate pollutant index ordered Huaibei>Hefei>Wuhu>Xuancheng>Huangshan,and the concentration of SO2 and NOx were increasing year by year,which showed Huibei>Hefei>Wuhu>Xuancheng>Huangshan in the same year.The index of leaf weight and leaf area of urban green plants showed Sophora japonica>Cinnamomum camphora>Ulmus pumila>Salix babylonica,and protective enzymes (SOD,POD,CAT) and non-protective enzymes (PAL,PPO),soluble protein,soluble sugar,chlorophyll a and b,WUE,NUE showed Sophora japonica>Cinnamomum camphora>Ulmus pumila>Salix babylonica.There was no significant difference of PUE among these urban green plants.The free proline and malondialdehyde content showed Sophora japonicaCinnamomum camphora>Ulmus pumila>Salix babylonica,and qN showed no significant difference(P>0.05).Correlation analysis showed that the physiological and ecological impacts of four urban green plants were strongly influenced by SO2 and NOx.In total,the results indicated that Ulmus pumila and Salix were sensitive to air pollution and had a lower tolerance to atmospheric pollution.So controlling the sources of pollution emission was to control the worsening of air pollution in Anhui Province and even the whole nation,and important measures must to be given great attention to improve urban greening landscape.

References:

 

[1]肖慧玲,陈小平,另青艳,等.园林植物滞尘能力分析及其叶面滞尘高光谱定量遥感模型[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(Z1):229-236.

[2]陈圣乾,王鑫,陈建徽,等.山西公海湖泊沉积物记录的大气粉尘现代过程[J].中国沙漠,2017(2):228-236.

[3]鲁敏,李英杰.绿化树种对大气污染物吸收净化能力的研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,2002,15(2):7-9.

[4]马小明,李诗刚.中国城市大气污染物总量控制方法及案例研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(2):265-270.

[5]迟妍妍,张惠远.大气污染物扩散模式的应用研究综述[J].环境污染与防治,2007,29(5):376-381.

[6]郑淑颖.二氧化硫污染对植物影响的研究进展[J].生态科学,2000,19(1):59-64.

[7]苏行,胡迪琴,林植芳,等.广州市大气污染对两种绿化植物叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):599-604.

[8]高厚强,张晓玲.合肥市大气污染对植物叶绿素(a,b)含量比例的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(3):367-368.

[9]刘世忠,薛克娜,孔国辉,等.大气污染对35种园林植物生长的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(4):329-335.

[10]康玲芬,李锋瑞,张爱胜,等.交通污染对城市土壤和植物的影响[J].环境科学,2006,27(3):556-560.

[11]杜敏华,张乃群,李玉英,等.大气污染对城市绿化植物叶片叶绿素含量的影响[J].中国环境监测,2007,23(2):86-88.

[12]温达志,孔国辉,张德强,等.30种园林植物对短期大气污染的生理生态反应[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3):311-317.

[13]张志良.植物生理学实验指导[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2003:267-269.

[14]宋英石,李锋,王效科,等.城市地表硬化对银杏生境及生理生态特征的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(8):2164-2171.

[15]宋慈安,宋玮,雷良奇,等.植物生理生态学因素对金属矿床生物地球化学异常形成的影响[J].Advances in Geosciences,2014(4):349.

[16]周起超,熊倩,李林,等.经低温,低光处理的藻类在不同光强,氮磷浓度下的生理生态特征[J].湖泊科学,2015(6):1059-1066.

[17]孙金伟,吴家兵,任亮,等.氮添加对长白山阔叶红松林2种树木幼苗光合生理生态特征的影响[J].生态学报,2016(21):6777-6785.

[18]王晓荣,胡兴宜,唐万鹏,等.模拟长江滩地水淹胁迫对3种树种幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(1):45-49.

[19]管铭,金则新,李月灵,等.千岛湖次生林优势种植物光合生理生态特性[J].生态学报,2015,35(7):2057-2066.

[20]刁松锋,邵文豪,董汝湘,等.无患子光合生理日变化及其与生理生态因子的关系[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(4):828-834.

[21]曹刚,张国斌,郁继华,等.不同光质LED光源对黄瓜苗期生长及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(6):1297-1304.

[22]习玉森,姜卫兵,文杨,等.不同生长型观赏桃叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].南京农业大学学报,2017,40(2):234-241.

[23]何勇,符庆功,朱祝军.低温弱光对辣椒叶片光合作用,叶绿素荧光猝灭及光能分配的影响[J].核农学报,2013(4):479-486.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-06-11