|Table of Contents|

Morphological Structure and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of  Scindapsus aureus Under Drought Stress

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年09
Page:
100-105
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Morphological Structure and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of  Scindapsus aureus Under Drought Stress
Author(s):
JIN Yifeng1CHEN Yang1SHI Zhenjie1SUN Huashan2WANG Qi1YANG Yahan1
(1.College of Life Science and Agriculture,Qiqihar University,Qiqihar,Heilongjiang 161006;2.College of Horticulture and Garden,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030)
Keywords:
Scindapsus aureusdrought stressanatomical structuredrought resistance
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20172713
Abstract:
With Scindapsus aureus as experimental materials,and the observation of anatomic structure and morphological appearance and the electro-conductibility determination as experimental method,the influence of drought stress on the anatomic structure and drought resistance of hydroponic culture and soil culture Scindapsus aureus were studied,so as to explore the influence of cultivation mode (hydroponic culture and soil culture) on the drought resistance of Scindapsus aureus.The results showed that under drought stress,Scindapsus aureus could reduce leaf surface area and plaint water desorption by the curling and wilting of leaves.With the extension of drought period,Scindapsus aureus showed obvious changes in appearance,mainly presenting tarnish and curling of leaves and pendulous petiole.The measurement of the conductivity of leaves revealed that under drought stress, the degree of damage to the leaves of hydroponic culture Scindapsus aureus was higher than those of soil culture Scindapsus aureus.After rewatering,the response of hydroponic culture Scindapsus aureus to rewatering secondary to drought showed a hysteresis effect,and the response of soil culture Scindapsus aureus to rewatering secondary to drought was faster as compared with hydroponic culture Scindapsus aureus.Under drought stress,the anatomical structure of Scindapsus aureus changed,the epidermis and cortex of the stem and root of Scindapsus aureus shrunk,the vascular cylinder of the stem obviously thickened,and the vascular cylinder of the root flattened.Comprehensive analysis indicated that under the same drought stress,the drought-resistant ability of soil culture Scindapsus aureus was higher than that of hydroponic culture Scindapsus aureus,and under the same rewatering conditions,the restoring ability of soil culture Scindapsus aureus was higher than that of hydroponic culture Scindapsus aureus.

References:

 

[1]谢光新,顾昌华,廖承会.绿萝不同基质扦插繁殖效果比较试验[J].江苏农业科学,2009(4):192-194.

[2]田如英,姚益.观叶植物绿萝的标准化生产技术[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(7):97-98.

[3]CHEN L,SHEN Y H,XIE A J,et al.Biological synthesis of calcite crystals using Scindapsus aureum petioles[J].Journal of Materials Science,2010,45(11):2938-2943.

[4]赵兰枝,郑树景,郭瑞珍,等.水培与土培绿萝的根系形态及结构比较[J].广东农业科学,2010,37(11):121-122.

[5]刘晓荣,廖飞雄,程德星,等.盆栽绿萝生产技术规程[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(16):52-53.

[6]桂克印,李炎林,唐前瑞,等.不同光照处理下的绿萝叶片及叶片解剖结构[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(5):95-98.

[7]王燕,康小平,何仲,等.不同栽培介质和处理方式对盆栽绿萝扦插繁殖的效果[J].琼州学院学报,2015,22(5):67-70.

[8]王晶,徐志英,盛云燕.低温对绿萝幼苗叶片氮素及叶绿素含量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2011(15):208-209.

[9]刘国荣.绿萝的光合特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(12):170-173.

[10]刘英,郭沛涌,廖纪华.美人蕉和绿萝在修复富营养化水体过程中对Cr(Ⅵ)胁迫的生理生化响应[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2011,38(1):78-84.

[11]ZHANG F J,ZHANG K K,DU C Z,et al.Effect of drought stress on anatomical structure and chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of sugarcane[J].Sugar Tech,2015,17(1):41-48.

[12]吴丽君,李志辉,杨模华,等.赤皮青冈幼苗叶片解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3619-3626.

[13]吴建慧,李雪,王玲.2种委陵菜叶片结构和生理指标对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].草地学报,2015,23(1):125-129.

[14]李合生.植物生理学实验指导[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:261-263.

[15]李正理.植物制片技术[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,1987:129-137.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-05-24