|Table of Contents|

Effects of Wheat Straw on Emergence and Seedling Growth of Chinese Cabbage(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年24
Page:
17-22
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Wheat Straw on Emergence and Seedling Growth of Chinese Cabbage
Author(s):
HAN Zhe1; WANG Xuehan1; LI Hongzhuo1;  WANG Siqi1; LIU Huiyan2; PAN Kai1
1.College of Horticultural & Landscape Architecture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030;2.Datong District Linyuan Town Government of Daqing City,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163000
Keywords:
continuous cropping soil; wheat straw; Chinese cabbage; seedling growth
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20172183
Abstract:
In this experiment,the Chinese cabbage was used as material.Experimental carried with straw extract test and sow test used continuous cropping soil as substrate.With extract experiment, germination rate,germination potential,germination index,shoot dry weight and fresh weight were measured.And growth seedling and seedling index were determination after straw treatments,in order to supply references for wheat straw use in vegetables production.The results showed that the germination of Chinese cabbage seeds was effected with straw extract treatment.The straw treatment of 0.01 g?mL-1 raised the germination rate,germination potential,germination index.The fresh weight increased with treatment of 0.02 g?mL-1,germination rate and fresh weight raised under 0.03 g?mL-1 treatment.Chinese cabbage seedling was effected by straw added to continuous cropping soil.The germination rate was inhibited with the 1.0% straw treatment with no decaying management,the inhibitory rate was 16.67% compared with control.The effect of growth index showed CK(0%)>0.5%>1.0%>1.5%>2.0%.In decaying test,the treatment of 1.0% and 1.5% raised the emergence rate,as 4.76% and 19.04% compared with control.After decompose,the inhibition degree of seedling growth was depressed.To 2.0% treatment compared with the control,the top fresh weight reduced 74.53%,and the top dry weight reduced 73.13%.The seedling growth was promoted with the treatment of 1.0% and 1.5%.

References:

[1]宋福宣,丛超,蒋欣梅,等.前茬蔬菜对后茬秋白菜生产影响初探[J].湖北农业科学,2010,49(12):3088-3090.

[2]DIXON G R.The occurrence and economic impact of Plasmodiophora brassicae and clubroot disease[J].Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,2009,28(3):194-202.
[3]REN L,SU S,YANG X,et al.Intercropping with aerobic rice suppressed Fusarium wilt in watermelon[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(3):834-844.
[4]于高波,吴凤芝,周新刚.小麦,毛苕子与黄瓜轮作对土壤微生态环境及产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2011,48(1):175-184.
[5]盂令洋.中国蔬菜栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010:433-477.
[6]袁祖华,粟建文,童辉,等.藕莲-水稻-菜薹栽培模式的研究与推广[J].长江蔬菜,2013(18):164-165.
[7]DEBOSZ K,RASMUSSEN P H,PEDERSEN A R.Temporal variations in microbial biomass C and cellulolytic enzyme activity in arable soils:Effects of organic matter input[J].Applied Soil Ecology,1999,13(3):209-218.
[8]王璞,赵秀琴.几种化感物质对棉花种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2001,6(3):26-31.
[9]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2005.
[10]鲍红春,郝丽珍,张凤兰,等.沙芥水浸提液对白菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的化感作用[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(7):1109-1116.
[11]XIANG L,ZHAO H M,LI Y W,et al.Effects of the size and morphology of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the germination of Chinese cabbage seeds[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2015,22(14):10452-10462.
[12]赵先龙,李晶,顾万荣,等.连作下玉米秸秆腐解液对种子萌发的影响[J].作物杂志,2013(5):137-141.
[13]张承胤.玉米千秆还田对小麦根部病害的化感作用研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2007.
[14]张承胤,代丽,甄文超.玉米秸秆还田对小麦根部病害化感作用的模拟研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(5):298-301.
[15]张蓓,郁继华,颉建明,等.腐熟玉米秸秆水浸液对黄瓜种子萌发特性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(5):82-87.
[16]QI Y,ZHEN W,LI H.Allelopathy of decomposed maize straw products on three soil-born diseases of wheat and the analysis by GC-MS[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2015,14(1):88-97.
[17]张雪松,曹永胜,曹克强.保护性耕作与小麦主要土传病害问题和治理对策[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(s):47-48.
[18]宋鹏飞,毛培,李鸿萍,等.秸秆还田对夏玉米主要害虫发生程度的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2014,48(3):334-338.
[19]李素娟,陈继康,陈阜,等.华北平原免耕冬小麦生长发育特征研究[J].作物学报,2008,34(2):290-296.
[20]齐永志.玉米秸秆还田的微生态效应及对小麦纹枯病的适应性控制技术[D].保定:河北农业大学,2014.
[21]刘臧珍,王淑敏.秸秆还田添加氮素调节碳氮比的研究[J].河北农业大学学报,1995,18(3):31-35.
[22]孔垂华.植物化感作用研究中应注意的问题[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(3):332-336.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-12-28