Effects of Different Stock-scion Combinations on Apple Growth, Fruit Quality and Yield(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Title:: Effects of Different Stock-scion Combinations on Apple Growth, Fruit Quality and Yield

Author(s):: HUO Qiangqiang1; LI Gaochao1; CAO Shan2; HE Wanru1; WANG Junfeng1; LI Bingzhi1; (1.College of Horticulture,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100；2.College of Food Science and Engineering,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100)

Abstract:: The experiment was conducted with ‘M9-T337’ and ‘M26’ as the self-rooted rootstock and interstock,rootstock for M.micromalus,the scion variety for ‘Fuji’ and ‘Gala’,compared with effects of different stock-scion combinations on apple growth,fruit quality and yield.The results showed,the stock-scion combinations of self-rooted rootstock and interstock of the tree height were dwarfism,the proportion of middle and short branches more than standard stock,and the proportion of short branches of self-rooted rootstock more than interstock.The cultivars ‘Fuji’of evaluation and sorting of fruit quality ‘Fuji/M9-T337’ /‘M.micromalus>Fuji/M9-T337’> ‘Fuji/M26/M.micromalus ’>‘Fuji/M26’>‘Fuji/M.micromalus’.The cultivars ‘Gala’ of evaluation and sorting of fruit quality as follow,‘Gala/M26’/‘M.micromalus’>‘Gala/M9-T337’/‘M.micromalus’>‘Gala/M9-T337’>‘Gala/M26’>‘Gala’/‘M.micromalus’.The ‘Fuji’ and ‘Gala’ of all stock-scion combinations of yield performance,self-rooted rootstock>interstock>standard stock,and ‘Fuji/M9-T337’ and ‘Gala/M9-T337’ five years cumulative production were highest than else.After comprehensive analysis,it was found the ‘Fuji/M9-T337’ and ‘Gala/M9-T337’ stock-scion combinations had the best performance in Qianyang area of Shaanxi Province,which was suitable for vigorous development.

[1]李天忠,张志宏.现代果树生物学[M].北京：科学出版社,2008:133.

[2]关军锋,魏邵冲,徐迎春,等.不同中间砧对‘金冠’苹果果实品质及矿质营养的影响[J].河北农业科学,2004,8(4):19-21.

[3]阎振立,张全军,过国南,等.产地和砧木对华冠苹果芳香物质及风味的影响[J].果树学报,2007,24(3):263-267.

[4]薛晓敏,路超,王金政,等.山东省不同地区M26矮化中间砧对苹果树生长发育、果实产量与品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2012,44(6):53-57.

[5]马宝焜,徐继忠,孙建设.关于我国苹果矮砧密植栽培的思考[J].果树学报,2010(1):105-109.

[6]李丙智,张林森,韩明玉,等.世界苹果矮化砧木应用现状[J].果农之友,2007(7):4-6.

[7]张秀芝,郭江云,王永章,等.不同砧木对富士苹果矿质元素含量和品质指标的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014(2):414-420.

[8]白海霞,高彦,高鹏,等.M26自根砧与中间砧苹果树栽培表现初报[J].山西果树,2007(6):10-11.

[9]王贵平,王金政,薛晓敏,等.苹果M9自根砧、M26中间砧生产评价报告[J].山东农业科学,2011(11):41-43.

[10]薛晓敏,路超,王金政,等.矮化中间砧对苹果树生长结果及果实品质的影响[J].落叶果树,2012(1):5-7.

[11]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T10651-2008鲜苹果[S].北京:中国标准出版社，2008.

[12]CAI Q,LIU J,KING L.A comprehensive model for assessing lake eutrophication[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,13(12):1674-1678.

[13]王贵平,王金政,师忠轩,等.M系苹果矮化砧木与砧穗组合研究[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(9):44-46.

[14]顾曼如.苹果不同砧穗组合的生长结果特性研究I生长发育特性[J].落叶果树,1983(1):1-4.

[15]温树英,伊凯.富士苹果嫁接在M系矮化中间砧上的生育表现[J].北方果树,1982(2):24-27.

[16]赵同生,赵国栋,张朝红,等.不同矮化中间砧对‘宫崎短枝富士’树体生长、产量和品质的影响[J].果树学报,2016(11):1379-1387.

[17]李丙智,韩明玉,李高潮.千阳矮砧苹果[M].杨凌：西北农林科技大学出版社,2013.

[18]赵玲玲,姜中武,宋来庆,等.不同砧木对红将军苹果果实品质和香气物质的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(S1):234-238.

[19]王建斌.长富2苹果矮化中间砧密植与乔砧密植的比较试验[J].山西农业科学,2004,32(1):43-45.

[20]李永焘,张水绒,李晓斌,等.矮化自根砧苹果树的主要优缺点[J].果农之友,2016(4):37-38.

[21]权学利,李媛,赵仕国.苹果矮化自根砧优质高效栽培技术[J].中国园艺文摘,2016,32(10):190-191.

Last Update: 2017-05-27