|Table of Contents|

Effect of Elevation on Survival of Woody Plants of  Jinhewan Wetland Botanical Garden in Harbin(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年09
Page:
69-74
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Elevation on Survival of Woody Plants of  Jinhewan Wetland Botanical Garden in Harbin
Author(s):
YUE HuaLU YihanHU Shangchun
(College of Landscape Architecture,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150040)
Keywords:
HarbinJinhewan Wetland Botanical Gardenelevationswoody plants
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201709015
Abstract:
Harbin Jinhewan Wetland Botanical Garden has the characteristics of unstable floodplain,and the growth of woody plants in different elevation is different.In this study,the whole garden was divided into three regions,and the 20 m × 20 m quadrats were selected as the investigation units.The plant species and growth status were collected,and the differences of plant species and spatial structure between 2011 and 2016 were compared.Then the suitable species of woody plants under different elevation in wetland were studied.The results showed that there were 29 species of woody plants in the park in 2016,belonging to 11 families,of which 16 species of trees and 13 species of shrubs.Under water habitat (elevation 115.17-116.00 m),only Salix saposhnikovii and Salix matasudana,which were growing well.In the amphibious environment(elevation 116.00-119.49 m),except for Salicaceaeother plants grew in worse condition,compared with completion of plans in 2011,the species disappeared at a rate as high as 52.4%,the order of the survival rate of woody plants:Salix saposhnikovii(88.7%)> Salix matasudana(80.3%)>P.alba×P.berolinensis(78.5%)> Ulmus pumila(76.3%)>Betula platyphylla(72.8%),all of them had good ability to adapt to the local environment under the elevation level.Even in flooded amphibious region(elevation 119.49-125.68 m),the order of the survival rate of woody plants:Salix matasudana(97.6%)>P.alba×P.berolinensis(93.5%)> Ulmus pumila(90.7%)>Juglans mandshurica(89.6%)>Prunus triloba(88.5%),all of them had good ability to adapt to the local environment under the elevation level.

References:

 

[1]李震,王岩茹,殷志鹏.湿地植物在金河湾公园中的应用与建议[J].水利科技与经济,2009,15(9):804.

[2]张庆辉,赵捷,朱晋,.中国城市湿地公园研究现状[J].湿地科学,2013(1):129-135.

[3]KONDOH A,NISHIYAMA J.Changes in hydrological cycle due to urbanization in the suburb of Tokyo Metropolitan AreaJapan[J].Advanced Space Research,2000,26(7):1173-1176.

[4]程琳钰,王嘉楠.河流型城市湿地公园植物景观营造:以沙颍河国家湿地公园为例[J].中国城市林业,2014(4):44-47.

[5]张洪东,陶颖颖,魏巍.关于城市湿地公园概念的讨论[J].山西建筑,2009,35(33):352-353.

[6]任伊滨,李福生,李继光,.哈尔滨市松北区城市自然湿地功能分析[J].环境科学与管理,2011,36(2):94-97.

[7]张慧,李智,刘光,.中国城市湿地研究进展[J].湿地科学,2016(1):103-107.

[8]徐新洲,薛建辉.基于AHP-模糊综合评价的城市湿地公园植物景观美感评价[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(2):217-220.

[9]李玉霞,胡希军,干领.城市湿地公园观赏草植物选择及优化配置[J].北方园艺,2014(15):8892.

[10]谭雅懿,王烜,王育礼.中国寒区湿地研究进展[J].冰川冻土,2011,33(1):197-204.

[11]陶冶.黑龙江省湿地植物景观设计初探[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.

[12]冯富娟,穆立蔷,陶雷,.哈尔滨城市湿地植物资源的调查[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(5):119-121.

[13]赵霜,岳桦,李青.哈尔滨群力新区雨阳公园湿地植物配置相关问题研究[C].中国观赏园艺研究进展,2011.

[14]WELLS J R,MUELLER M,PARKER J,et al.The Minnesota wetland evaluation methodology for the north central United States[C].Wetland Evaluation Methodology Task Force,1988.

[15]孙卫邦.乡土植物与现代城市园林景观建设[J].中国园林,2003,19(7):63-65.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-12