|Table of Contents|

Identification and Degradation of Phenolic Acids in Rhizosphere Soil of  Replanted Muskmelon(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年09
Page:
14-17
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Identification and Degradation of Phenolic Acids in Rhizosphere Soil of  Replanted Muskmelon
Author(s):
ZHANG Lu1; YANG Ruixiu1; WANG Ying2; YAO Yuan1; YAN Han1; GAO Zenggui1
(1.College of Plant Protection,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110866;2.Institute of Applied Ecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang,Liaoning 110016)
Keywords:
muskmelon; continuously cropped soil; phenolic acids;  Trichoderma; degradation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201709004
Abstract:
To investigate the allelochemicals of rhizosphere soil of muskmelon under different cropping years,pot experiments was conducted.The compounds in the soil were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).By using of degradation characteristics of Trichoderma viride,to degrade pheonlics in soil,to provide reference for easing continuous cropping obstacle of muskmelon.The results showed that,seven phenolic compounds,ρ-hydroxybenzcic acid,vanillic acid,syringic acid,vanillin,coumaric acid,ferulic acid,benzoic acid were found in rhizosphere soil and the contents was increased with the increasing years of sole muskmelon cropping.And the total concentration of these phenolics reached 245.39 mg?kg-1 dry soil,which was significantly higher the control soil.Trichoderma viride (T23) was examined for their ability to degrade the phenlics with three inoculation methods (spore suspension,PD bacterial suspension and fermentation of wheat bran).Results indicated that T.viride (T23) could effectively degrade the residual pheonlics in soil,and the method of wheat bran fermentation exhibited the best degradation effect,of which the degradation rate was 25%.

References:

 

[1]孔垂华,胡飞.植物化感(相生相克)作用及其应用[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:30-42.

[2]WU H,HAIG T,PRATLEY J,et al.Allelochemicals in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)：variation of phenolic acids in shoot tissues[J].Journal of Chemical Ecology,2001,27(1):125-135．

[3]OGWENO J,YU J.Autotoxic potential in soil sickness：Are-examination[J].Allelopathy Journal,2006,18(1):93-102．

[4]JILANI G,MAHMOOD S,CHAUDHRY A,et al.Allelochemicals：sources,toxicity and microbial transformation in soil：A review[J].Annals of Microbiology,2008,58(3):351-357．

[5]杨瑞秀,高增贵,姚远,等.甜瓜根系分泌物中酚酸物质对尖孢镰孢菌的化感效应[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(8):2355-2360.

[6]马云华,王秀峰,魏敏,等.黄瓜连作土壤酚酸类物质积累对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2149-2153.

[7]孙海兵,毛志泉,朱树华.环渤海湾地区连作苹果园土壤中酚酸类物质变化[J].生态学报,2011,31(1):90-97.

[8]李培栋,王兴祥,李奕林.连作花生土壤中酚酸类物质的检测及其对花生的化感作用[J].生态学报,2010,30(8):2128-2134.

[9]HARMAN G,HOWELLC R,VITERBO A,et al.Trichoderma species opportunistic,avirulent plant symbionts[J].Nature,2004(2)：43-56.

[10]WANG S N,YANG R X,LIU X,et al.Overcoming the autotoxicity of muskmelon by Trichoderma spp.[J].Allelopathy Journal,2016,39(1):29-42.

[11]庄敬华,杨长成,高增贵.连作对甜瓜化感作用的模拟试验[J].植物保护学报,2008,38(4):317-321.

[12]赵福庚,何龙飞.植物逆境生理生态学[M].北京:化学工业出版社，2004:9-10,28-29.

[13]BAERSON S R,DAYAN F E,RIMANDO A M,et al.A functional genomics investigation of allelochemical biosynthesis in Sorghum bicolor root hairs[J].Journal of Biological Chemistry,2008,283(6):3231-3247．

[14]ZHANG J H,MAO Z Q,WANG L Q,et al.Bioassay and identification of root exudates of three fruit tree species[J].Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2007,49(3):257-261．

[15]POLITYCKA B,ADAMSKA D.Release of phenolic compounds from apple residues decomposing in soil and the influence of temperature on their degradation[J].Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,2003,12(1):95-98．

[16]吴凤芝,赵凤艳.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J].东北农业大学学报,2003,34(1):114-118.

[17]YU J Q,MATSUI Y.Phytotoxic substances in root exudates of cucumber[J].J Chem Ecol,1994,20(1):21-31.

[18]周志红,骆世明,牟子平.番茄的化感作用研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(4):445-449.

[19]WANG C,XU G Y,GE C C,et al.Progress on the phenolic acid substances and plant soil sickness[J].Northern Horticulture,2009(3):134-137．

[20]WU F Z,ZHAO F Y.Root exudates and cropping obstacle[J].Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,2003,34(1):114-118．

[21]阮维斌,赵紫娟,薛健.高效液相色谱法检测与化感现象相关的5种酚酸[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(6):609-612.

[22]周艳丽,乔宏宇,高红春,等.甜瓜连作对其根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2005(19):158-161.

[23]田给林.连作草莓土壤酚酸类物质的化感作用及其生物调控研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2015.

[24]尹承苗.连作苹果园土壤酚酸类物质的分布及其对真菌的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2014.

[25]高强.甜瓜化感作用生理生化机制及主要化感物质的鉴定[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.

[26]王宗芹.杨树人工林连作酚酸生物降解的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2010.

[27]何绍江,毛新国,李传涵.杉木解酚菌的研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(3):344-346.

[28]程莹,白寿发,庄敬华.木霉菌多功能生防菌剂对瓜类枯萎病的防效研究[J].现代农业科学,2010（23）:157-158.

[29]杨瑞秀.甜瓜根系自毒物质在连作障碍中的化感作用及缓解机制研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2014.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-11