|Table of Contents|

Solid Fermentation of Antagonistic Actinomycetes and Effect of  Promoting Plant Growth in Pot(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年08
Page:
124-128
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Solid Fermentation of Antagonistic Actinomycetes and Effect of  Promoting Plant Growth in Pot
Author(s):
GU Zhiguang1; 2; XU Wenfeng1; 2; FAN Lingchao1; 2; HU Zhaoping1; 2; CHEN Qing2; 3
(1.Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co.Ltd.,Linyi,Shandong 276700；2.State Key Laboratory of Nutrition Resources Integrated Utilization,Linyi,Shandong 276700；3.College of Resources and Environment，China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193)
Keywords:
actinomycetes; solid fermentation; growth promoting; antagonistic microorganisms; plant pathogenic bacteria
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201708028
Abstract:
In order to explore the promoting plant growth effect of different actinomycetes,three actinomycetes strains were selected with strong antagonistic effect on two pathogens,to optimize the solid fermentation conditions.Amaranth was used as test plant,the effect of different amount of actinomycetes on growth was studied.The results showed that the highest number of solid fermentation agents reached 1.64×1010 cfu?g-1, three strains of antimicrobial actinomyces had strong promoting effect.Compared with the control treatment,the growth promoting effect of strain A1 was optimal with dosage of 0.1 g?kg-1 soil,the yield increased 13.35%.With the application rate increased,growth promoting effect was enhanced.It inhibited the growth of amaranth by more addition.It showed the different mechanism and effects of actinomycetes were different.

References:

 

[1]李世东,缪作清,高卫东.我国农林园艺作物土传病害发生和防治现状及对策分析[J].中国生物防治学报,2011(4):433-440.

[2]ARDANOV P,SESSITSCH A,HAGGMAN H,et al.Methylobacterium-induced endophyte community changes correspond with protection of plants against pathogen attack[J].PLoS One,2012(7)：e46802.

[3]BONATERRA A,BADOSA E,CABREFIGA J,et al.Prospects and limitations of microbial pesticides for control of bacterial and fungal pomefruit tree diseases[J].Trees-Struct Funct,2012(26):215-226.

[4]田玉虎,谷巍.微生物固体发酵参数和设备的研究进展[J].饲料广角,2014(3):29-31.

[5]张武岗,冯俊涛,方香玲,等.放线菌19G-317菌株的鉴定及其抑菌活性研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2009(3):243-248.

[6]李堆淑.放线菌A_4产淀粉酶发酵条件的优化[J].贵州农业科学,2013(2):112-114,119.

[7]杨希娟,蔡晓剑,陈占全.防治辣椒疫病的生防放线菌固体发酵培养基优选试验[J].北方园艺,2010(2):179-182.

[8]段颖异,陈洪章.固态发酵基质的三相结构变化对其传递性质的影响[J].化工学报,2012(4):1204-1210.

[9]赵科刚,韩立荣,宗兆锋.放线菌153菌株的定殖和促生效果研究[J].西北农业学报,2010(2):57-60.

[10]刘大群,ANDERSON NA,KINKEL L L.拮抗链霉菌防治马铃薯疮痂病的大田试验研究(英文)[J].植物病理学报,2000(3):237-244.

[11]徐亚军,赵龙飞,陈普,等.植物病原菌拮抗性野生艾蒿内生菌的分离、筛选和鉴定[J].生态学报,2013(12):3697-3705.

[12]GAJERA H P,DARSHNA G H,ZINKAL A,et al.Molecular evolution and phylogenetic analysis of biocontrol genes acquired from SCoT polymorphism of mycoparasitic Trichoderma koningii inhibiting phytopathogen Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.infection[J].Genetics and Evolution,2016,45:383-392.

[13]KIDARSA T A,SHAFFER B T,GOEBEL N C,et al.Genes expressed by the biological control bacterium Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 on seed surfaces under the control of the global regulators GacA and RpoS[J].Environ Microbiol,2013(15):716-735.

[14]王世强,杨陶陶,李庆蒙,等.链霉菌JD211对水稻幼苗生长及土壤可培养功能微生物的影响[J].广东农业科学,2014(11):10-13,237.

[15]陈冲,王小东,郭传滨,等.微生物菌剂不同用量对烤烟生长和叶片关键酶活性的影响[J].山东农业科学,2015,47(9):73-76.

[16]何斐,张忠良,崔鸣,等.放线菌‘D74’对魔芋的防病促生作用[J].园艺学报,2015,42(2):367-376.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-05