|Table of Contents|

Effects of Biomass Charcoal on Physiological Characteristics of Lily(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年07
Page:
92-98
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Biomass Charcoal on Physiological Characteristics of Lily
Author(s):
ZHU Yihao; ZHU Yanlin; CAO Xing; LYU Futang
(College of Agriculture，Liaocheng University，Liaocheng，Shandong 252059)
Keywords:
biomass charcoal; potted of lily; bud stage; flowering period; physiological characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201707021
Abstract:
‘Pink champion’ of lily was used as test material，by using pot experiment to study the responses of physiological characteristics of lily of buds and flowering period to different biomass charcoal addition levels,among which,CK(The each pot of biochar was 0 grams and peat soil was 200 grams)，C10 (The each pot of biochar was 10 grams and peat soil was 190 grams)，C20(The each pot of biochar was 20 grams and peat soil was 180 grams)，C30(The each pot of biochar was 30 grams and peat soil was 170 grams)，C40(The each pot of biochar was 40 grams and peat soil was 160 grams).The results showed that the root system of protective enzyme activity(CAT，POD，SOD) and the contents of soluble protein，soluble sugar，proline were first increased and then declined with the increasing biomass charcoal addition on buds and flowering period of lily，the protective enzyme activity(CAT) in C20 and C30 processing had not significant difference on buds stage，the protective enzyme activity(POD) in C20 and C30 processing had not significant difference on flowering period，the protective enzyme activity(CAT) reached the highest in the treatment of C30 on buds stage，the rest of indicators were reached the highest in the C20 processing；the content of MDA was rising after falling trend，C20 processing was the lowest.The leaves of content of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b，protective enzyme activity(CAT，POD，SOD) and the contents of soluble protein，soluble sugar，proline were first increased and then declined with the increasing biomass charcoal addition on buds and flowering period of lily，the protective enzyme activity(POD) in C40 and CK processing had not significant difference on buds stage，the protective enzyme activity(POD) of C40 was significantly lower than CK on flowering period，the content of soluble protein was reached the highest in C30 processing on flowering period，the rest of indicators were reached the highest in the treatment of C20，the contents of carotenoids and malondialdehyde were rising after falling trend，the content of MDA in C20 and C30 processing had not significant difference on buds stage，the each indexs of flowering period were reached the lowest in C20 processing.In flowering period，the protective enzyme activity(CAT，POD，SOD) and the contents of soluble protein，soluble sugar，proline were first increased and then declined with the increasing biomass charcoal addition，the content of soluble protein of flowers in C20 and C30 processing had not significant difference，the protective enzyme activity (SOD) of flowers was reached the highest in C30 processing，the rest of indicators were reached the highest in C20 processing；the content of MDA was rising after falling trend and C20 processing was the lowest too.To sum up，lily was reached the best growth and metabolism，the strongest resistance.

References:

 

[1]翁福军,卢树昌.生物炭在农业领域应用的研究进展与前景[J].北方园艺,2015(8):199-203.

[2]李力,刘娅,陆宇超,等.生物炭的环境效应及其应用的研究进展[J].环境化学,2011(8):1411-1421.

[3]ABEL S,PETERS A,TRINKS S,et al.Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil[J].Gederma,2013,202:183-191.

[4]王浩,焦晓燕,王劲松,等.不同氮肥水平下生物炭对高粱苗期生长及有关生理特性的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(6):195-201.

[5]van ZWIETEN L,KIMBER S,MORRIS S,et al.Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility[J].Plat and Soil,2010,327(1/2):235-246.

[6]DUMROESE R K,HEISKANEN J,ENGLUND K,et al.Pelleted biochar:Chemical and physical properties show potential use as a substrate in container nurseries[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2011,35:2018-2027.

[7]黄剑.生物炭对土壤微生物量及土壤酶的影响研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2012.

[8]李亮亮,李天来,臧健,等.生物碳对加入外源肉桂酸土壤酶活性、微生物结构及土壤养分的影响[J].华北农学报,2013,28(3):210-216.

[9]刘玉学,刘薇,吴伟祥,等.土壤生物质炭环境行为与环境效益[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(4):977-982.

[10]花莉,张成,马宏瑞,等.秸秆生物质炭土地利用的环境效益研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2489-2492.

[11]何绪生,耿增超,佘雕,等.生物炭生产与农用的意义及国内外动态[J].农业工程学报,2011(2):1-7.

[12]陈温福,张伟明,孟军,等.生物炭应用技术研究[J].中国工程科学,2011(2):83-89.

[13]何绪生,张树清,佘雕,等.生物炭对土壤肥料的作用及未来研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(15):16-25.

[14]WARNOCK D D,LEHMANN J,KUYPER T W,et al.Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil-concepts and mechanisms[J].Plant Soil,2007,300(1-2):9-20.

[15]VAUGHN S F,KENAR J A,THOMPSON A R,et al.Comparison of biochars derived from wood pellets and palletized wheat straw as replacements for peat in potting substrates[J].Industrial Crops and Products,2013,51:437-443.

[16]KARRHU K,MATTILA T,BERGSTROM I,et al.Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-term pilot field study[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2011,140(1-2):309-313.

[17]郑强,王志敏,蔡永旺,等.夏玉米叶片叶绿素含量的时空动态及其与植株含氮率关系的研究[J].玉米科学,2008,16(6):75-78.

[18]汤继华,谢慧玲,黄绍敏,等.缺氮条件下玉米自交系叶绿素含量与光合效率的变化[J].华北农学报,2005,20(5):10-12.

[19]张永峰,殷波.混合盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(1):46-50.

[20]熊璇,于晓英,魏湘萍,等.遮荫对重瓣大花萱草光合色素含量及生理特性的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2009(1):29-32.

[21]王艺,韦小丽.不同光照对植物生长、生理生化和形态结构影响的研究进展[J].山地农业生物学报,2010,29(4):353-359.

[22]朱晓军,梁永超,杨劲松,等.钙对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗抗氧化酶活性和膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(3):453-459.

[23]张晗芝.生物炭对土壤肥力、作物生长及养分吸收的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2011.

[24]王以斌,缪锦来,姜英辉,等.脯氨酸和可溶性糖在南极冰藻低温适应机制中的作用[J].生物技术通报,2016,32(2):198-202.

[25]胡珍兰,张海伟,胡承孝,等.钼氮配施对考烟光合作用及可溶性糖含量的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(3):199-203.

[26]刘长锴,李彦生,涂冰洁,等.钾肥施用对菜用大豆生殖生长期可溶性糖含量及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2016,35(2):270-274.

[27]郑浩.芦竹生物炭对农业土壤环境的影响[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2013.

[28]袁金华,徐仁扣.生物质炭的性质及其对土壤环境功能影响的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(4):779-785.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-04-18