|Table of Contents|

Effects of Dust Retention Amount on Proline Content in Seven Garden Trees(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年20
Page:
100-104
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Dust Retention Amount on Proline Content in Seven Garden Trees
Author(s):
DING YanliZHANG LeiFU Yongyu
Special Education College,Beijing Union University,Beijing 100075
Keywords:
dust retention abilityprolineadversity
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20170361
Abstract:
Taking the leaves of Sophora japonica var.pendula,Lonicera japonica,Fraxinus chinensis,Pterocarya stenoptera,Magnolia×Soulangeana,Morus alba,Ginkgo biloba as test materials,the effect of the dusty leaves′s physiological activities was studied,the captured amount of TSP and PM2.5 per unit leaf area for seven trees were measured by water washing method.In the same time,the proline content change was measured between seven kinds of trees before and after the dust retention.The results showed that the dust retention amount per unit leaf area of different tree species was different,such as Ginkgo biloba,the higher amount dust retention per unit area of the trees′ leaves was 0.034 mg?cm-2,such as Morus alba,the lower amount dust retention per unit area of the trees′ leaves was only 0.010 mg?cm-2.Among Ginkgo biloba, Pterocarya stenoptera, Sophora japonica var.pendula,Morus alba, Magnolia×Soulangeana, the proline content in leaves was different degree in increase with the variation ranges of 21.73%-338.25%.The growth of proline had ranged from large to small,Ginkgo biloba,Pterocarya stenoptera,Sophora japonica var.pendula,Morus alba,Magnolia×Soulangeana;but Fraxinus chinensis and Lonicera japonica,the proline content in leaves declined,the content of reduction was 59.77%,66.14%.So Ginkgo biloba was the highest ability of dust retention(PM>2.5). Morus alba was the weakest ability of dust retention(PM>2.5).

References:

[1]王蕾,高尚玉,刘连友,等.北京市11种园林植物滞留大气颗粒物能力研究[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(4):597-601.

[2]么旭阳,胡耀升,刘艳红.北京市8种常见绿化树种滞尘效应[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(3):92-95.
[3]范舒欣,宴海,齐石茗月,等.北京市26种落叶阔叶绿化树种的滞尘能力[J].植物生态学报,2015,3(97):736-745.
[4]谢滨泽,王会霞,杨佳,等.北京常见阔叶绿化植物滞留PM2.5能力与叶面微结构的关系[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(12):2432-2438.
[5]李新宇,赵松婷,李延明.北方常用园林植物滞留颗粒物能力评价[J].中国园林,2015,(3):72-75.
[6]梁丹,王彬,王云琦,等.北京市典型绿化灌木阻滞吸附PM2.5能力研究[J].环境科学,2014,35(9):3605-3611.
[7]李海亮,赵庆芳,王秀春,等.兰州市大气污染对绿化植物生理特性的影响[J].西北师范大学学报,2005,41(1):55-60.
[8]梁淑英,胡海波,夏尚光.大气污染对3种行道树光合与生理生化的影响[J].林业科技开发,2008,22(3):29-32.
[9]庞发虎,杨建伟,王正德,等.南阳市环境污染对植物生理特征的影响[J].河南农业科学,2012,41(10):79-82.
[10]李巧云,关振寰,殷芙蓉,等.浮沉对冬小麦叶片光合作用及细胞膜透性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,20(8):1387-1391.
[11]郭鑫,张秋亮,唐力,等.呼和浩特市几种常绿树种滞尘能力的研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(17):62-65.
[12]柴一新,祝宁,韩焕金.城市绿化树种的滞尘效应[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1121-1126.
[13]刘旻霞,马建祖.6种植物在逆境胁迫下脯氨酸的累积特点研究[J].草业科学,2010,27(4):134-138.
[14]罗音,孙明高.干旱胁迫对5树种叶片中脯氨酸含量的影响[J].山东林业科技,1999(4):1-4.
[15]赵志红,吴红芝.月季切花水分胁迫耐性差异与脯氨酸的关联性[J].林业科学,2010,46(2):74-79.
[16]汤华,柳晓磊.盐胁迫下玉米苗期农艺性状和脯氨酸含量变化的研究[J].植物生理科学,2007,23(3):244-249.
[17]高灿红,胡晋,郑昀晔,等.玉米幼苗抗氧化酶活性、脯氨酸含量变化及与其耐寒性的关系[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1045-1050.
[18]陈有民.园林树木学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990.
[19]陈俊愉,程绪珂.中国花经[M].上海:上海文化出版社,1990.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-11-01