|Table of Contents|

Effects of Foliage Spraying Biogas Fluid With Micro-fertilizer on Production and Quality of Cucumber in Greenhouse(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年03
Page:
61-65
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Foliage Spraying Biogas Fluid With Micro-fertilizer on Production and Quality of Cucumber in Greenhouse
Author(s):
HAN ChunyeWANG ChonghuaTIAN ChunliWANG XizhiGAO HongmeiWANG Lihe
(Henan Agricultural Vocational College,Zhongmu,Henan 451450)
Keywords:
biogas fluidboron fertilizermanganese fertilizerfoliage sprayingcucumber in greenhouseproductionquality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201703014
Abstract:
Cucumber was used as test material,using water control,foliage spraying 50% biogas fluid,foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.5 g?L-1 boron fertilizer,foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.1 g?L-1 manganese fertilizer,the effects of biogas fluid with micro-fertilizer on growth and production and quality of cucumber in greenhouse were studied.The results indicated that folliage spray 50% biogas with 0.5 g?L-1 boron fertilizer and foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.1 g?L-1 manganese fertilizer were obviously function that compared with water control on cucumber growth,production and quality.Leaf length and leaf width and petiole long were obviously superior that compared with water control,chlorophyll content was obviously superior compared with foliage spraying 50% biogas fluid.Under foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.5 g?L-1 boron fertilizer,foliage spraying 50% biogas with the water control yield of cucumber were 28.77% and 38.52%,respectively,higher than that of 0.1 g?L-1 manganese fertilizer 6.19% and 14.23%,respectively.Foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.5 g?L-1 boron fertilizer,foliage spraying 50% biogas with 0.1 g?L-1 manganese fertilizer were obviously superior on cucumber of soluble protein compared with foliage spraying 50% biogas fluid,cucumber appearance and flavor had a better impact strength.Therefore,foliage spraying biogas with micro-fertilizer was a reasonable method on cucumber in greenhouse.

References:

 

[1]曹云,常志州,马艳,等.沼液施用对辣椒疫病的防治效果及对土壤生物学特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,201346(3)507-516.

[2]伍金伟,汪诚文,宋楚雯.沼液在气雾栽培技术中的应用研究[J].中国沼气,2013,31(4)7-11.

[3]李光远,王凤华,蒋燕.叶面喷施锰对生菜生长和品质的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2015,43(3)54-57.

[4]黄鹏,张文涛,路喆.叶面喷施锌、硼、锰肥对兰州百合干物质积累与分配的影响[J].中国农业生态学报,201018(2)295-298.

[5]杨丹,吕彦超,刘程,等.浓缩沼液对温室黄瓜产量及抗病性和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2015(8)166-168.

[6]潘天春.叶面喷施不同浓度硼肥对苦荞主要性状的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2013(21)5171-5173,5198.

[7]李胜利,夏亚真,刘金,等.沼液与钾钙耦合对黄瓜叶绿素荧光参数、产量及品质的影响[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(11)106-110.

[8]郭四拜.冬小麦施用沼肥增产效果试验研究[J].中国沼气,201533(5)81-83.

[9]黄亚丽,尹淑丽,张丽萍,等.沼液对黄瓜种子发芽和苗期生长的影响[J].中国沼气,2012,30(2)33-40.

[10]黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等.基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2)362-371.

[11]赵秀梅,王晨冰,李宽营,等.叶面喷施沼液对温室油桃光合特性的影响[J].果树学报,2011,28(4):680-684.

[12]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.

[13]徐小方,杜宗绪.园艺产品质量检测[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.

[14]王喜萍.食品分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.

[15]陈毓荃.生物化学实验方法和技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.

[16]田福发,余翔,周玲玲,等.冲施不同浓度沼液肥对温室黄瓜产量和品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(2)122-123.

[17]路学花,马英成.沼渣沼液在设施黄瓜生产上的应用研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2012,53(11)76-77.

[18]赵广才,常旭虹,杨玉双,等.叶面喷施不同营养元素对冬小麦产量和品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,201131(4)689-694.

[19]李军,刘凤军,张国芹,等.叶面喷施锰肥对番茄果实品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,201139(6) 273-274.

[20]陆景陵.植物营养学(上册)[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002.

[21]谭金芳.作物施肥原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002.

[22]陆亚珍,马爱军,朱刚,等.沼液-秸秆深施对大棚黄瓜生长及产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(21):51-54.

[23]张亚莉,王宏宇,刘桂芹,等.沼液和保水剂配合蘸根对黄瓜生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2011(8)36-37.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-22