|Table of Contents|

Comparasion of Photosynthetic and Water Use Characteristics of Different Varieties (Lines) in Prunus humilis(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年02
Page:
7-11
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparasion of Photosynthetic and Water Use Characteristics of Different Varieties (Lines) in Prunus humilis
Author(s):
HA XiaoliHAN ZhanjiangLIANG Jiye
(College of Plant Science,Tarim University/Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin/Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-agriculture Around Tarim Basin,Alar,Xinjiang 843300)
Keywords:
Prunus humilisphotosynthetic characteristicswater use efficiency (WUE)
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201702002
Abstract:
The measurement of leaf photosynthetic characteristics and water use characteristics of 9 varieties (lines) in Prunus humilis was taken by GFS3000 photosynthesis system under natural condition.The results showed that net photosynthetic rate (Pn),stomatal conductance (Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci),transpiration rate (Tr),transpiration ratio (TR) and water use efficiency (WUE) were different among 9 varieties (lines) in Prunus humilis.Under the Regiment 224 cultivation condition,there was an extremely significant positive correlation between Pn and Gs,Tr,WUE,while an extremely significant negative correlation between Pn and Ci,TR.Ci had an extremely significant positive correlation with TR while an extremely significant negative correlation with WUE.Gs had an extremely significant positive correlation with Tr while a significant negative correlation with TR.HY-Ⅵ had the highest Pn and higher WUE,but its WUE was not the highest,while HY-Ⅰ had the highest WUE and higher Pn,but its Pn was not the highest.Pn and WUE of 01-01 were all the lowest and those of the other varieties (lines) were in the middle level.Different varieties(lines) adapted to growth environment by different ways of regulation of photosynthesis and water use in Prunus humilis.

References:

 

[1]周家华,常虹,兰彦平,.欧李果酒的酿造工艺研究[J].食品工业科技,2010,31(1):269-271.

[2]车家骧,谢元贵,彭熙,.欧李叶片秋季光合作用日变化研究[J].北方园艺,2012(9):6-9.

[3]褚建民,孟平,张劲松,.土壤水分胁迫对欧李幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(3):295-300.

[4]尹赜鹏,刘雪梅,商志伟,.不同干旱胁迫下欧李光合及叶绿素荧光参数的响应[J].植物生理学报,2011,47(5):452-458.

[5]孙丽君,吕光辉,田幼华,.不同土壤水分条件下荒漠植物白麻光合生理特性的比较[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(4):755-760.

[6]刘端,白志强,韩燕梁,.2种欧李幼苗光合特性及叶绿素含量的比较[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(2):115-117.

[7]罗永忠,成自勇.水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(2):215-221.

[8]李合生.现代植物生理学[M].3.北京:高等教育出版社,2012:44-45.

[9]万素梅,胡守林,杲先民,.干旱胁迫对塔里木盆地红枣光合特性及水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012(3):171-175.

[10]周小玲,田大伦,张旭东,.桤木不同品系蒸腾特性与水分利用效率的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2008,28(1):1-7.

[11]柴仲平,王雪梅,孙霞,.氮、磷、钾施肥配比对红枣光合特性与水分利用效率的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(2):144-150.

[12]杨俊,马健,王婷婷,.5种荒漠植物抗旱性及其与抗旱指标相关性的定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(6):143-146.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-22