|Table of Contents|

In-forest Landscape Quality Improvement Techniques in Northeast Secondary Forest Park(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年01
Page:
65-69
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
In-forest Landscape Quality Improvement Techniques in Northeast Secondary Forest Park
Author(s):
ZHANG Jie1WEI Jinhua1XU Chengyang2WANG Hongjun1WEI Xiguang1LIANG Shuang2
(1.Forestry College,Beihua University,Jilin,Jilin 132013;2.College of Forestry,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083)
Keywords:
in-forest landscape qualitySBE methodpruningcleaning shrublitter-fall
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201701017
Abstract:
For improving the quality of in-forest landscape in northeast secondary forest park,Jilin city Corn-growing Ditch Forest Park was taken as an example.Methods of pruning,cleaning shrub and litter-fall were chosen to clean the forest.The effects of quality of the in-forest landscape was determined by using SBE method,correlation and regression analysis.The results showed that the quality of in-forest landscape had remarkable improvement by using these technical measures.By cleaning shrub,the mean value of SBE of in-forest landscape had increased from 29.8 to 70.3;by pruning,the mean value of SBE of in-forest landscape increased from 38.3 to 58.3;by cleaning litter-fall,the mean value of SBE of in-forest landscape increased from 36.9 to 53.4.The dimensional feeling(X10) was the main indicators that influenced on the control group landscape quality of secondary forest.The beauty degree model was built MSBE=-49.7+31.2X10 (P<0.01);naturalness degree(X4) were the main indicators that influenced on cleaning shrub group landscape quality of secondary forest.The beauty degree model was built MSBE=-132+56.5X4.Trees arrangement(X5) was the main indicators that influenced on pruning group landscape quality of secondary forest.The beauty degree model was built MSBE=-102.5+58.1X5(P<0.01);trees form(X1) was the main indicators that influenced on cleaning litter-fall group landscape quality of secondary forest.The beauty degree model was built MSBE=-73.2+39.6X1(P<0.05).So,the descending order effect of the improvement quality landscape in these measures was cleaning shrub>pruning>cleaning litter-fall.At the same time,it had been taken some changes on the landscape structure and the main indicators that influenced on landscape quality by using three technical measures for improving the quality of forest landscape.

References:

 

[1]翁殊斐,陈锡沐,黄少伟.SBE法进行广州市公园植物配置研究[J].中国园林,2002185):84-86.

[2]王竞红,魏殿文,张峥嵘.深圳市莲花山公园植物景观评价[J].国土与自然资源研究,20071):57-58.

[3]董建文,翟明普,章志都,等.福建省山地坡面风景游憩林单因素美景度评价研究[J].北京林业大学学报(自然科学版),200931(6):154-158.

[4]章志都.京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.

[5]王雁,陈鑫峰.心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用[J].林业科学,1999(5)110-117.

[6]张哲,潘会堂.园林植物景观评价研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报,2011286):962-967.

[7]沈国舫.森林培育学[].北京:中国林业出版社,2011.

[8]元玉飞,尹伟伦,夏新莉,等.修枝对欧美杨107杨水分生理的影响[J].林业科学,2011473:33-38.

[9]程朝阳.修枝强度对杉木幼林生长的影响[J].福建林学院学报,200727(1):70-73.

[10]姜岳忠,秦光华,王卫东,等.杨树大径级工业用材林定向培育技术[J].山东林业科技,2005(2):30-32.

[11]于清录,龙丛英,王柱,等.盐碱区杨树速生丰产林造林技术[J].辽宁林业科技,2004(4):45-46.

[12]王春胜,赵志刚,吴龙敦,等.修枝高度对西南桦拟木蠹蛾为害的影响[J].西北林学院学报,200127(6):120-123.

[13]黄衍庆.间伐修枝措施对松突圆蚧的控制效果[J].华东昆虫学报,2005(4):379-382.

[14]朱金兆,刘建军,朱清科,等.森林凋落物层水文生态功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002(Z1):30-34.

[15]郑金萍,郭忠玲,徐程扬,等.长白山北坡主要森林群落凋落物现存量月动态[J].生态学报,2001(18):4299-4306.

[16]原作强,李步杭,白雪娇,等.长白山阔叶红松林凋落物组成及其季节动态[J].应用生态学报,2010(9):2171-2178.

[17]张新平,王襄平,朱彪,等.我国东北主要森林类型的凋落物产量及其影响因素[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(5):1031-1040.

[18]郭忠玲,郑金萍,马元丹,等.长白山各植被带主要树种凋落物分解速率及模型模拟的试验研究[J].生态学报,2006(4):1037-1046.

[19]龚冰苓,汤晓敏,王云.城市公园中的灌木造景研究[J].上海交通大学学报,20093:253-257.

[20]DANIEL T CBOSTER R S.Measuring landscape aestheticsthe scenic beauty estimation method[C].USDA Forest Service Research Paper,1976167:66.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-16