|Table of Contents|

Population Structure of Dryopteris fragrans (L.) Schott in Six Natural Distribution Areas of Heilongjiang Province(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年24
Page:
70-76
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Population Structure of Dryopteris fragrans (L.) Schott in Six Natural Distribution Areas of Heilongjiang Province
Author(s):
CHEN Lingling1; LIANG Yantao2; BU Zhigang1; CHANG Ying1; ZHANG Ruikai1
(1.College of Life Sciences，Northeast Agricultural University，Harbin，Heilongjiang 150030;2.Life Science Department，Daqing Normal University，Daqing，Heilongjiang 163712)
Keywords:
Dryopteris fragrans (L.) Schott; population; population structure
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201624018
Abstract:
In order to know the population structure of Dryopteris fragrans，Huzhong and Oupu area in greater Khingan，Hongxing District in Yichun，ErSanChi and NanBeiQuan in Wudalianchi Scenic Area,Hongwei village in Mudanjian natural distribution areas in Heilongjiang Province were investigated in June，2011.The results showed that the maximum and minimum population density of D.fragrans was 4.78 plant?m-2 and 1.56 plant?m-2 respectively，indicating that population density of D.fragrans was small.Spatial distribution pattern of D.fragrans were aggregated distribution，and the aggregated degree was low.The age structure showed a partial normal distribution with the center being two to four years.One to four-year-old D.fragrans had relative larger population number，while four to nine-year-old D.fragrans had smaller population number.Population number decreased with the increasing age when D.fragrans was older than four years.The life table showed that D.fragrans had low survival rate in juvenile period，the mortality rate of three to four-year-old individuals reached 80.93%.The maximum age in the population was nine-year-old.The survival curves of the six populations were all Deevey C.In conclusion，D.fragrans was in a stable population，its expansion ability was not strong，and could keep a natural regeneration.

References:

 

[1]黄庆阳,肖自添,常缨.香鳞毛蕨配子体发育的研究[J].植物研究,2006,26(3):267-269.

[2]常缨.香鳞毛蕨国内外研究进展[J].北方园艺,2009(4):113-115.

[3]刘海燕,杜文钊,宋国强,等.香鳞毛蕨药材的质量标准研究[J].广东药学院学报，2016,32(1):37-40.

[4]朱俊访,李博.香鳞毛蕨有效部位及药理作用的研究进展[J].今日药学,2009(10):57-58.

[5]ITO H，MURANAKA T，MORI K，et al.Dryofragin and aspidin PB，piscicidal components from Dryopteris fragrans[J].Chem Pharm Bull,1997,45(10):1720-1725.

[6]范华倩,沈志滨,陈艳芬,等.香鳞毛蕨不同提取液体外抗真菌作用研究[J].中药材,2012,12(35):1981-1985.

[7]张彦龙.药用植物香鳞毛蕨药效物质基础的研究[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,2006.

[8]黄庆阳.药用植物香鳞毛蕨(Dryopteris fragrans(L.)Schott.)生态群落调查和AFLP分析[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2008.

[9]徐有绪,丁彩霞,赵亮.植物种群结构特征及其对环境的响应[J].青海草业,2009,18(2):28-31.

[10]李耕耘,钱美玲,欧晓昆,等.种内变异及其群落效应[J].云南大学学报（自然科学版）,2012,34(52):412-418.

[11]刘金福,何中声,洪伟,等.濒危植物格氏栲保护生态学研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2011,33(5):136-143.

[12]COATES F，LUNT I D，TREMBLAY R L.Effects of disturbanceon population dynamics of the threatened orchid Prasophyllum correctum Jones and implications forgrassland management in south-eastern Australia[J].Biological Conservation,2006,129:59-69.

[13]刘强,殷寿华,兰芹英.兰科植物种群动态研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2010(11):2980-2985.

[14]袁宏波,张锦春,褚建民,等.库姆塔格沙漠典型植物种群年龄结构特征[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(11):2304-2309.

[15]陈丽,王炜,王东波,等.扩展点格局分析方法在灌木种群空间分布格局研究中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12)：2700-2705.

[16]韩路,王家强,王海珍,等.塔里木河上游胡杨种群结构与动态[J].生态学报,2014,16(34):4641-4651.

[17]向悟生,王斌,丁涛,等.喀斯特季节性雨林蚬木种群结构和数量动态[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(4):825-831.

[18]李景侠,张文辉,李红.稀有濒危植物独叶草种群分布格局的研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(5):879-884.

[19]信金伟，王佳冠，姜立举,等.莲座蕨属五种珍稀濒危植物种群特征[J].西部林业科学,2016,2(45):52-57.

[20]陶翠.中国五针松组濒危植物濒危机制探讨[M].北京：北京林业大学,2013.

[21]吴明开,沈志君,刘海,等.梵净山自然保护区珙桐天然种群生命表与生存分析[J].生态学杂志，2012，31(6)：1419-1424.

[22]李晓笑,王清春，崔国发,等.濒危植物梵净山冷杉野生种群结构及动态特征 [J].西北植物学报，2011,31(7)：1479-14861.

[23]刘巍,曹伟.长白山云冷杉群落主要种群生态位特征[J].生态学报，2011，30(8)：1766-1774.

[24]林红梅.粗茎鳞毛蔗种群年龄结构与空间分布格局研究[D].长春：吉林农业大学，2005.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-02-13