|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Soil Conditioners on Growth,Yield and Quality of Cucumber(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年23
Page:
19-23
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Soil Conditioners on Growth,Yield and Quality of Cucumber
Author(s):
SONG JipingYIN HeqinYANG YanjieLIN DuoCHEN Ning
(Horticultural College,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao,Shandong 266109)
Keywords:
soil conditionercucumbergrowthstress resistancequalityyield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201623005
Abstract:
Under the condition of greenhouse,cucumber was used as material,by pot experiment,the effects of five kinds of soil conditioner zeolite,kaolin,diatomite,peat and bentonite on cucumber growth,quality and yield were studied.The results showed that,soil conditioners increased cucumber plant height,stem diameter,leaf number and plant resistance,improved the quality of cucumber and increased yield per plant.Under peat treatment,cucumber plant high,stem diameter,number of leaves,the activity of superoxide dismutase and soluble protein,soluble sugar,net photosynthetic rate and yield per plant were the highest among the soil conditioners,and 21.00%,15.25%,35.28%,57.17%,43.56%,48.73%,52.77% and 37.25% higher than those of the control.The highest peroxidase activity and malondialdehyde content of cucumber treated with bentonite were 20.78% higher and 60.20% lower than those of the control.The catalase activity and vitamin C content of cucumber treated with diatomite were the highest,which were 153.75% and 1.85% higher than those of the control.Comprehensive evaluation,effects of peat treatment were the best,followed by the diatomite and bentonite,effects of former three treatments compared with the control had reached the significant level,zeolite,kaolin effect compared with the control group had no significant difference.

References:

 

[1]OGWENO J O.Studies on the effects of high temperature stress and growth regulators abscisic acid cytokinins and brassinosteroids on photosynthetic apparatus of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.cv)[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006.

[2]耿士均,刘刊,商海燕,.园艺作物连作障碍的研究进展[J].北方园艺,20127:190-195.

[3]侯鹏程,俞平高,张华,.设施菜地土壤中存在的主要问题及对策[J].上海农业科技,2013(4):100-101.

[4]孙蓟锋.几种矿物源土壤调理剂对土壤养分、酶活性及微生物特性的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2012.

[5]董晓伟.牡蛎壳土壤调理剂对大棚土壤理化、生物性状影响的研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2004.

[6]李珍珍,吴珏,杨银娟,.土壤改良剂对设施黄瓜生长及土壤状况的影响[J].上海农业学报,2011(2):87-91.

[7]周红梅,孙蓟锋,段成鼎,.5种土壤调理剂对大蒜田土壤理化性质和大蒜产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2013(3):26-30.

[8]姜晶晶,李俊良,刘新明,.生物菌剂型土壤调理剂对温室番茄生长及土壤理化性状的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009(14):6564-6566,6605.

[9]廉晓娟,郭锐,李明悦,.调理剂对设施土壤物理性状及蔬菜产量品质的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2015,54(19):4702-4704.

[10]杨振超,陈双臣,邹志荣.土壤调理剂对温室西葫芦产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2005(2):164-166.

[11]陈德西,何忠全,郭云建,.不同土壤调理剂对韭菜酸性土壤的改良效果[J].西南农业学报,2012(5):1751-1755.

[12]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].2.北京:高等教育出版社,2000.

[13]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:7.

[14]张志良,翟伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.

[15]王忠.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:434-436.

[16]窦俊辉,喻树迅,范术丽,.SOD与植物胁迫抗性[J].分子植物育种,2010(2):359-364.

[17]克热木·伊力,袁琳,齐曼·尤努斯,.盐胁迫对阿月浑子SODCATPOD活性的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2004,41(3):129-134.

[18]徐心诚.低温弱光对黄瓜幼苗过氧化物酶同工酶和丙二醛含量的影响[J].河南农业科学,2012,41(1):113-116.

[19]张金恩,聂秋生,李迎春,.颖花分化期低温处理对早稻叶片光合能力和产量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2014(4):410-416.

[20]王凯,卢树昌,翁福军.不同土壤调理剂对设施黄瓜生长、产量与品质性状影响研究[J].天津农业科学,2015(11):12-15.

[21]叶菊.生态功能肥对甘草产量和品质的影响及其生理基础研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-01-18