|Table of Contents|

Effect of Light Quality on Growth and Partial Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Red Raspberry Tissue Culture Plantlets(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年22
Page:
15-19
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Light Quality on Growth and Partial Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Red Raspberry Tissue Culture Plantlets
Author(s):
GUO Fang12LIU Haipeng12LI Baoguo12ZHANG Xuemei12QI Guohui12LI Yingchao3
(1.College of Forestry,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000;2.Key Laboratory of Forest Resources and Forest Conservation in Hebei Province,Baoding,Hebei 071000;3.Forestry Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Forest Cultivation of State Forestry Bureau,Beijing 100091)
Keywords:
light qualityred raspberrytissue culture plantletsgrowth
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201622004
Abstract:
In order to establish suitable light quality for the growth of red raspberry tissue culture plantlets,using red raspberry ‘Heritage’ tissue culture plantlets as experimental material,the morphology,anntioxidant enzyme activity,carbon and nitrogen metabolism were studied.The results showed that,with the increasing of R/B(ratio of red to blue),red raspberry tissue culture plantlet′s height gradually increased from 1514 cm to a maximum of 1638 cm,it was the maximum value at 4R/B(red∶blue=4∶1),but the difference was not significant with W(white),then the height of the plant decreased with the increase of R/B,the minimum value was 0681 cm at 10R/B(red∶blue=10∶1),significantly less than the W.Stem diameter from a maximum of 0101 cm reduced to the minimum value of 0076 cm with the increase of R/B,it was the maximum value at R/4B(red∶blue=1∶4),the difference was significant with W,it was the minimum value at 10R/B.Leaf area,rooting rate and root length showed the same trend with stem diameter,all decreased with the increase of R/B,it was the maximum value at R/4B,was 0751 cm2,0786,1369 cm,it was the minimum value at 10R/B,was 0211 cm2,0357,0369 cm;SOD and CAT activity increased gradually from the minimum value(1832 μg?g-1FW,H2O25902 mg?g-1FW) of R/4B to the maximum value(10953 μg?g-1FW,H2O2 46978 mg?g-1FW) of 10R/B with the increase of R/B;POD activity increased gradually from the minimum value(5511 μg?g-1FW) of R/4B to the maximum value(20934 μg?g-1FW) of 4R/B,and then gradually decreased with the increase of R/B;MDA content increased gradually from the minimum value(7357 nmol?g-1FW) of R/4B to the maximum value(10880 nmol?g-1FW) of 10R/B with the increase of R/B.Carbohydrate content increased gradually from 200204 mg?g-1 to the maximum value(313917 mg?g-1),it was the maximum value at R/B and very significantly higher than W,then gradually decreased with the increasing of R/B,the minimum value was 154172 mg?g-1 at 10R/B,significantly lower than W.The content of free amino acid increased gradually from the minimum value(16903 mg?g-1) of R/4B to the maximum value(33180 mg?g-1) of 10R/B with the increase of R/B.Soluble protein content gradually decreased from the maximum value(12507 mg?g-1) of R/4B to the minimum value(2147 mg?g-1) of 10R/B with the increase of R/B.

References:

 

[1]NAOYA FMITSUKO K YMASAMI Uet al.Effects of light qualityintensity and duration from different artificial light sources on the growth of JP5petunia (Petunia×hybridaVilm.)[J].J Jpn Soc Horticult Sci2002,71:509-516.

[2]GUO SLIU XAI Wet al.Development of an improved ground-based prototype of space plant-growing facility[J].Advances in Space Research,2008,41:736-741.

[3]SHIN K SMURTHY H NHEO J Wet al.The effect of light quality on the growth and development of in vitro cultured Doritaenopsis plants[J].Acta Physiol Plant,2008,30:339-343.

[4]刘媛,李胜,马绍英,.不同光质对葡萄试管苗离体培养生长发育的影响[J].园艺学报,2009,36(8):1105-1112.

[5]冯东霞,施生锦.叶面积测定方法的研究效果初报[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(6):150-155.

[6]王婷.LED光源不同光质对不结球白菜生理生化特性及叶绿体超微结构的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2011.

[7]王虹.光质对黄瓜幼苗光合效率和白粉病抗性的调控机制[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009.

[8]刘晓英,徐志刚,常涛涛,.不同光质LED弱光对樱桃番茄植株形态和光合性能的影响[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(4):645-651.

[9]周琳,陈周一琪,王玉花,.光质对茶树愈伤组织中茶多酚及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].茶叶科学,2012(3):210-216.

[10]李慧敏.不同光源对棉花、油菜和不结球白菜组培苗与实生苗生长的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学,2012.

[11]王婷,李雯琳,巩芳娥,.LED光源不同光质对不结球白菜生长及生理特性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2011(4):69-73.

[12]陈文昊,徐志刚,刘晓英,.LED光源对不同品种生菜生长和品质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(7):1434-1440.

[13]唐大为,张国斌,张帆,.LED光源不同光质对黄瓜幼苗生长及生理生化特性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2011(1):44-48.

[14]KOWALLIK W.Blue light effects on respiration[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiol,1982,33:51-72.

[15]NINNEMANN H.Some aspects of blue light research during last decade[J].Photochem Photobiol,1995,61:22-31.

[16]吴毅明,徐师华.温室塑料棚环境管理[M].北京:北京农业出版社,1990:4-6,20

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-01-06