Relationship Between Leaf Anatomical Structure and Drought Resistance in Different Varieties of Raspberry(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Title:: Relationship Between Leaf Anatomical Structure and Drought Resistance in Different Varieties of Raspberry

Author(s):: GUI Yu1; LIU Ting1; 2; YANG Jinghui1; SHI Yanyu1; ZHANG Chao3; LIU Tailin3; (1.Horticulture and Gardening College，Tianjin Agricultural University，Tianjin 300384;2.Tianjin Xinyuan House E-commerce Co.Ltd.,Tianjin 300384;3.Biology and Food Engineering College,Tianshi University,Tianjin 301700)

Abstract:: The thickness of leaf，stomata density，leaf anatomical structure of epidermal cells，palisade tissue，spongy tissue，guard cells were analyzed with raspberry leaves to compare drought resistance of five kinds of raspberry varieties.The results showed that the leaves of ‘Kaiou’ (KO) and ‘Shani’ (SN) were the thickest，followed by ‘Canada black berry’ (CAN)and ‘Southern black raspberry’(SBR) and ‘Heritage’ was the thinnest；the epidermal cells and palisade tissue of KO were the thickest，followed by SN，and CAN and SBR，while ‘Heritage’ was the thinnest.The stomatal density of KO and SN were the biggest，followed by CAN and SBR，‘Heritage’ was the minimum.By membership values of anatomy-comprehensive analysis，the drought tolerance was that KO was the best and then SN，followed by CAN and SBR，while ‘Heritage’ was the worst.

[1]姜河，修英涛，蔡骞，等.我国树莓发展现状及产业化前景分析[J].辽宁农业科学,2006(2):45-48.

[2]何家庆，任静.皖南悬钩子植物资源及开发利用[J].天然产物研究与开发,2000,13(2):55-58.

[3]王宏斌,陈铁山.树莓和黑莓的栽培与加工利用[J].陕西林业科技，2000(2)：66-69.

[4]陆新龙.黑莓菊花饮料生产工艺[J].饮料工业,2002(5):33-36.

[5]张帅.无公害树莓生产技术[J].河南农业，2014(12):52-53.

[6]张清华,董凤祥.树莓发展现状与前景(下)[J].林业实用技术,2007,50(12):12-13.

[7]徐俐,金毅,王斌.树莓红色素的提取及稳定性的研究[J].食品科学，2006，27(5):191-194.

[8]黄俊轩,杨静慧,李双跃，等.不同防寒措施对树莓生长和越冬的影响[J].天津农业科学,2011,17(1):78-80.

[9]王丹丹.盐胁迫下樱桃砧木生长、生理生化及解剖结构的研究[D].天津:天津农学院,2013.

[10]吕晋慧,王玄,冯雁梦，等.遮荫对金莲花光合特性和叶片解剖特征的影响[J].生态学报,2011,32(19):6033-6043.

[11]徐兴友,张风娟,郭振清，等.6种野生耐旱花卉解剖学特征与耐旱性的关系[J].经济林研究，2008,26(3):13-19.

[12]彭永宏,章文才.称猴桃叶片耐旱性指标研究[J].果树科学，1996(13):29-32.

Last Update: 2016-12-21