|Table of Contents|

Effect of Brassinolide on Physiology Indexes of Melaleuca bracteata cv.‘Revolution Gold’ Under Different Low Temperature(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年17
Page:
67-72
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Brassinolide on Physiology Indexes of Melaleuca bracteata cv.‘Revolution Gold’ Under Different Low Temperature
Author(s):
ZHANG Niwen1WANG Li2WU Yun2LIU Guangli2
(1.Department of Computer Science,Sichuan Aerospace Vocational College,Guanghan,Sichuan 618300;2.College of Landscape Architecture,Sichuan Agricultural University,Chengdu,Sichuan 611130)
Keywords:
Melaleuca bracteata cv.‘Revolution Gold’brassinolidephysiological indexeslow temperature
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201617017
Abstract:
Using the twoyearold cutting seedlings of Melaleuca bracteata cv.‘Revolution Gold’ as material,effects of different concentration of BR (0(CK),1,0.1,0.01,0.001,0.000 1 mg?L-1) on leaf physiological indexes of Melaleuca bracteata cv.‘Revolution Gold’ at different temperature levels(5,0,-5,-10 ℃) were studied.The results showed that chlorophyll content,free proline content,soluble sugar content,SOD activity,POD activity,CAT activity firstly increasd and then decreasd with the rising of BR concentration.Also,these indexes were significant higher than CK treatment.These indexes were the highest scores when the concentration of BR was 0.1 mg?L-1.Interestingly,MDA content was the contrary change trend,meaning,firstly decreas and then increas.It was the lowest scores when the concentration of BR was 0.1 mg?L-1.There were the largest increase of SOD activity,POD activity and CAT activity in the 0-5 ℃ interval.It could be summed that BR was conducive to the growth ability of this species.The most suitable concentration of BR for the growth of this species under low temperature was 0.01-0.1 mg?L-1.When the temperature was 0-5 ℃,BR had the highest impact on the growth of this species.

References:

 

[1]范仲先.珍稀彩叶芳香乔木新品种千层金[J].农村新技术,2005(7):31.

[2]戴英样.最新色叶树种:千层金[J].广东园林,2003(1):43.

[3]ADAMS W W,ZATER C R,EBBERT V,et al.Pbotoprotective strategies of ovew intering evergreens[J].Bio Science,2004,54(1):41-49.

[4]陈善娜,刘继梅,游惠玲.抗寒剂和油菜素内酯对高原水稻抗冷性的影响[J].武汉植物研究,1997,19(2):123-128.

[5]王三根,汤学军,梁颖.油菜素甾醇和抗坏血酸对水稻幼苗抗寒性的研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1994,16(4):376-379.

[6]郝建军,康宗利,于洋.植物生理学实验技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007:141-142.

[7]张宪政.作物生理研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1992:144-155.

[8]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:164-263.

[9]张向荣.植物抗寒性机理研究综述[J].现代园艺,2009(12):2-4.

[10]王小华,庄南生.脯氨酸与植物抗寒性的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2008(11):398-402.

[11]石峰.低温对园林植物体内渗透物质与丙二醛含量的影响[J].山东林业科技,2011(5):85-93.

[12]喻方圆,徐锡增.植物逆境生理研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(5):6-11.

[13]罗军武,唐和平,黄意欢,.茶树不同抗寒性品种间保护酶类活性的差异[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001(2):94-96.

[14]刘东奇.浅谈低温对绿色植物叶片中叶绿素含量的影响[J].中学生物学,2011,27(9):6-7.

[15]王萍,郭晓冬,赵鹏.低温弱光对辣椒叶片光和色素含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2007(7):15-17.

[16]李建设,耿广东,程智慧.低温胁迫对茄子幼苗抗寒性生理生化指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(1):90-92,96.

[17]刘兴宇,周广柱,王新颖.日本厚朴抗寒生理研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2006,37(6):845-848.

[18]艾琳,张萍,胡成志.低温胁迫对葡萄根系膜系统和可溶性糖及脯氨酸含量的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2004,27(4):47-50.

[19]王华,王飞,陈登文,.低温胁迫对杏花SOD活性和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].果树科学,2000,17(3):197-201.

[20]杨春祥,李宪利,高东升,.低温胁迫对油桃花器官膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响[J].果树学报,2005,22(1):69-71.

[21]马振东,石艳霞.植物抗寒性的研究进展[J].林业科技情报,2012,42(1):1-2.

[22]黄高峰,王丽慧,方云花,.干旱胁迫对菊芋苗期叶片保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(2):552-555.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-10-13