|Table of Contents|

Growth Characteristics and Benefits of Soil and Water Conservation of Several Herbaceous Plant in the Gneiss Mountainous Region(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年14
Page:
70-74
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Growth Characteristics and Benefits of Soil and Water Conservation of Several Herbaceous Plant in the Gneiss Mountainous Region
Author(s):
SHI Xinyu1ZHAO Yu1LIU Yang1QI Guohui12ZHANG Xuemei12LI Baoguo12
(1.College of Forestry,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000;2.Research Center for Walnut Engineering and Technology of Hebei,Lincheng,Hebei 053400)
Keywords:
Gneiss Mountainherbaceous plantgrowthbenefits of soil and water conservation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201614018
Abstract:
In order to ascertain the growth characteristics and benefits of soil and water conservation of several herbaceous plant in the Gneiss Mountainous Region in Pingshan County,the slope of freshly plowed land in Xiayu Village was chosen as experimental field,two sowing patterns were used to reconstruct vegetation,single-sowing pattern and compound-sowing pattern.The results showed that seed germination time of Pennisetum sinese was the shortest,which was only 3 days;the next one was Cosmos bipinnata;Poa annua was the longest.After sowing for 15 days,the seedling average height of Pennisetum sinese was the highest (10.89 cm);the next one was Cosmos bipinnata (about 8.88 cm);the shortest was Trifolium repens (only 0.67 cm).The vegetation coverage of Cosmos bipinnata was the highest,which was about 56.9%;and those of Pennisetum sinese,Cosmos bipinnata+Medicago sativa +Pennisetum sinese,Cosmos bipinnata +Medicago sativa+Trifolium repens were 45.7%,36.1%,34.4% respectively.The soil erosion modulus and runoff coefficient of Pennisetum sinese respectively were 6.60 t?km-2,14.85% and its benefits of soil and water conservation was the best;the soil erosion modulus of Cosmos bipinnata+Medicago sativa+Trifolium repens and Cosmos bipinnata were respectively 11.13 t?km-2,12.70 t?km-2 and the runoff coefficient of them were 19.69%,21.34% respectively.So the erosion intensity of these two kinds of sowing patterns were both medium erosion.The best sowing pattern was mixing the seeds of Cosmos bipinnata,Pennisetum sinese,Medicago sativa and Trifolium repens together before sowing so as to promote soil and water conservation benefits.

References:

 

[1]李保国,张金柱,郭素平.河北省太行山片麻岩山地景观生态经济资源特征与利用研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2005(4):14-20.

[2]甘建国,王洁,谢锴,.邵怀高速公路边坡生态恢复植物种类选择:护坡植物层次分析法(AHP)优选试验研究[J].公路工程,2007(5):177-214.

[3]乔彦肖.卫星遥感技术在永定河流域(河北)土壤侵蚀调查评价中的应用研究[J].遥感技术与应用,2001,16(2):91-96.

[4]颜启传.种子学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.

[5]刘柳松,史学正,任红艳,.秸秆覆盖对干态和湿态土壤产流过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009(4):6-9,81.

[6]孙铁军,刘素军,武菊英,.6种禾草坡地水土保持效果的比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2008(3):158-162.

[7]黄满湘,章申,张国梁,.北京地区农田氮素养分随地表径流流失机理[J].地理学报,2003(1):147-153.

[8]潘声旺,雷志华,杨丽娟,.几种典型边坡植被的产流、产沙特征[J].生态环境学报,2013(7):1167-1172.

[9]孙浩峰,张丽萍,高雅玉,.半干旱黄土丘陵区坡地紫花苜蓿种植模式与径流的关系[J].草业科学,2014(5):922-926.

[10]廖晓勇,陈治谏,刘邵权,.陡坡地皇竹草水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2002(4):34-36.

[11]涂利华,谢财永,胡庭兴,.华西雨屏区几种牧草的水土保持能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):35-38,51.

[12]方文,刘杨,马立辉,.西南丘陵地区几种典型边坡植被的护坡效益分析[J].水土保持学报,2013(1):215-219.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-08-16