|Table of Contents|

Quality Difference Analysis on Different Varieties of Table Grapes(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年14
Page:
22-25
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Quality Difference Analysis on Different Varieties of Table Grapes
Author(s):
KONG Fanchao1; LIANG Yinli1; 2; GAO Dekai1; ZHU Shuaimeng2; AN Xiaojuan1
(1.College of Forestry，Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100；2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation，Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100)
Keywords:
table grapes; variety; quality
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201614005
Abstract:
Different varieties of grape that collected from the greenhouse and out ground in Xi’an of Shaanxi Province were used as test materials，fruit quality indexes(such as soluble sugar，soluble protein，vitamin C，soluble solids，titratable acid，resveratrol and procyanidin) were measured，to provide refrence for table grapes that suitable for cultivating in Shaanxi Province.The results showed that from the different varieties ways，the fruit quality of the ‘Xiahei’ and the ‘Hutai No.8’ performed best in greenhouse，then were the ‘Red Barbara’ and the ‘Gold Optimal No.2’，the comprehensive fruit quality of ‘Xiahei’ and the ‘Red Barbara’ were best varieties in open ground，the followed by were ‘Color Wweet’ and the ‘Buddha Ray’；From the point of quality performance，the ‘Hutai No.8’ and the ‘Red Barbara’ had better flavor，the ‘Red Barbara’ and the ‘Xiahei’ had better nutritional value in greenhouse，and the taste of the ‘Xiahei’ and the ‘Gold Optimal No.2’ were better，the active material of the ‘Xiahei’ was higher varieties in open ground，the ‘Color Wweet’ and the ‘Gold Finger’ has better flavor，the ‘Red Barbara’ had higher nutritional value，the second was the ‘Hutai No.8’，the ‘Color Sweet’ tasted good，the second was the ‘Buddha Ray’，the ‘Buddha Ray’ and the ‘Xiahei’ had higher active material.At the level of maturity，early and medium ripening varieties were better than that of late and very early maturity varieties.At the aspect of cultivation methods，upright was superior to the grafting，root stock had certain influence on fruit quality.

References:

 

[1]房经贵,章镇,张建敏,等.江苏发展葡萄的条件和策略[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2001(3):7-8.

[2]何映波.水分胁迫对鲜食葡萄生理影响的研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.

[3]张立军,樊金娟.植物生理学实验教程[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011:57-72.

[4]于晶,任朝阳,仓晶.次生代谢物白藜芦醇研究概述[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(7):104-107.

[5]赵平,宋学娟.葡萄籽原花青素含量测定[J].河北化工,2007,30(1):46-48.

[6]陈元平,程杨,胡佳羽,等.重庆9个葡萄品种的果实品质比较分析[J].南方农业学报，2014,45(1):76-79.

[7]张大鹏,邓文生,贾文锁.葡萄果实生长与水势及其分量和细胞壁展延性之间的关系[J].中国农业大学学报,1997,2(5):100-108.

[8]李记明.关于葡萄品质的评价指标[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,1999(1):54-57.

[9]孙希岚.白藜芦醇的分离纯化和溶解度的测定与关联[D].杭州:浙江大学,2008.

[10]邢文艳,苗小龙,王婷.西安地区户太8号葡萄的发展优势及对策[J].现代农业科技,2011(1)：391-393.

[11]陈雪林,孙权,张效若.夏黑葡萄的性状表现及避雨促成栽培技术[J].落叶果树,2012,44(2)：42-44.

[12]袁园园,姚玉新,王文军,等.葡萄嫁接栽培研究现状与展望[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2012(6):57-61.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-08-15