|Table of Contents|

Screening Test for Mixed Soilless Culture Matrix Based on Different Physical and Chemical Properties(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年08
Page:
36-40
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Screening Test for Mixed Soilless Culture Matrix Based on Different Physical and Chemical Properties
Author(s):
LI Yaolong1JI Yanhai23YU Pingbin2WU Zhanhui23LIU Mingchi23
(1.Plant Science and Technology College,Beijing University of Agriculture,Beijing 102206;2.Vegetable Research Center,Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences,Beijing 100097;3.Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North),Ministry of Agriculture,Beijing 100097)
Keywords:
soilless cultivation substratemicrostructurephysical propertiesbuffermixture substrates
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201608009
Abstract:
Peat is non-renewable resource in short time,in order to reduce the culture matrix cost,taking peatused peat,vermiculite and perlite as material.The buffer,bulk density,water holding capacity and other physical properties of single substrate and different substrate proportions were surveyed,and the microstructure was observed to find out suitable ratio of mixture substrates to reduce the peat’s amount.The results showed that the peat’s bulk density was the highest,perlite’s water-holding capacity was the largest,total porosity of vermiculite was maximum,which was due to the difference of the internal microstructure of substrate.Different substrates on pH buffer select from the highest to the lowest were peat,vermiculite,perlite.Salt buffer of peat and perlite was similar,vermiculite was the worst.According to the different proportion of experiment established regression model between bulk density,water-holding capacity,water-holding’s pore with peat,vermiculite and perlite,and based on the experimental data of 20 kinds of mixed substrate screening V (peat)∶V (vermiculite)∶V (perlite)=1∶1∶2,1∶1∶3,1∶2∶1,1∶2∶2,1∶2∶3,which physical properties were all in appropriate range that could reduce the amount of peat 24%-48%.

References:

 

[1]田吉林,汪寅虎.设施无土栽培基质的研究现状、存在问题与展望(综述)[J].上海农业学报,2000(4):87-92.

[2]毛羽,张无敌.无土栽培基质的研究进展[J].农业与技术,2004(3):83-88.

[3]刘婧.无土栽培技术的应用与发展[J].北方园艺,2012(16):204-206.

[4]潘凯,韩哲.无土栽培基质物料资源的选择与利用[J].北方园艺,2009(1):129-132.

[5]郭世荣.无土栽培[M].北京:中国农业出版社,20033-10.

[6]刘伟,余宏军,蒋卫杰.我国蔬菜无土栽培基质研究与应用进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2006(3):4-7.

[7]谢小玉,邹志荣,江雪飞,.中国蔬菜无土栽培基质研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2005(6)280-283.

[8]刘士哲.现代实用无土栽培技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,20014-25.

[9]江盛德.现代园艺栽培介质选购与应用指南[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006:73.

[10]尚庆茂.尚庆茂博士“蔬菜集约化穴盘育苗技术”系列讲座,第四讲:育苗基质的科学配制[J].中国蔬菜,2011(7):42-45.

[11]秦玲,魏钦平,李嘉瑞,.草炭对砂质土壤保水特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005(10)51-54.

[12]张云舒,张殿宇,徐万里,.蘑菇渣复合基质特性及对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J].西北农业学报,2008(3)242-245.

[13]HARDRECK K A.Properties of coir dust and its use in the formulation of soilless potting media commune[J].Soil Sci PlantAnal199324(3,4):349-363.

[14]MEEROW A W.Growth of two subtropical ornamentals using coir as a peat substitute[J].Hort Sci199429(12)1484-1486.

[15]谷建田,张喜春,范双喜,.不同栽培基质对番茄生长发育和产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008(4)318-322.

[16]谢嘉霖,刘荣华,叶启芳,.无土栽培基质电导率和pH值测定条件的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(3)415-416.

[17]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3.北京:中国农业出版社,2000183-187.

[18]蒲胜海,冯广平,李磐,.无土栽培基质理化性状测定方法及其应用研究[J].新疆农业科学,2012(2)267-272.

[19]栾亚宁,孙向阳,刘克林,.几种泥炭基质物理性质比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2008(9)137-140.

[20]杨建杰,张桂香,任爱民,等.草炭在双孢蘑菇沙壤土覆土中的应用研究[J].北方园艺,2013(16):172-173.

[21]房嫚嫚,张志刚,董春娟,等.国内外蔬菜育苗用草炭理化特性比较分析[J].中国蔬菜,2012(10):56-59.

[22]ABAD MNOGUERA PBURES S.National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant productionA case study in Spain[J].Bioresource Technology2001772)197-200.

[23]GARCIA-GOMEZ ABERNAL M PROIG A.Growth of ornamental plants in two composts prepared from agroindustrial wastes[J].Bioresource Technology2002831)81-87.

[24]林明和,刘树堂,曹培顺,.不同栽培基质对黄瓜生长发育的影响[J].安徽农业科技,200634(21):5502-5503.

[25]梁志卿,赵瑞,孙吉娜,.基质中不同比例珍珠岩的添加对番茄穴盘苗的矮化效应[J].东北农业大学学报,201142(4)72-76.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-06-24