|Table of Contents|

Effect of Different Years of Continuous Cropping on Garlic Growth and Physiological Activities(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年05
Page:
5-8
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Different Years of Continuous Cropping on Garlic Growth and Physiological Activities
Author(s):
TIAN Chunli1WANG Xizhi1YAO Lijuan1WANG Lihe1LI Benyin2JIA Yunchao1
(1.College of Agriculture and Engineer,Henan Vocational College of Agriculture,Zhongmou,Henan 451450;2.Nutrition and Resource Environment Research Institute,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002)
Keywords:
continuous croppinggrowthphysiological activities
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201605002
Abstract:
With the soilscropped garlic for 0 (control),10,20,30 years as test materials,apot experiment was conducted to study the effect of continuous cropping onthe garlicgrowth and physiological activities.The results showed that the biological indicators of garlic were declined rapidly first and then slowly with the increasing of continuous cropping years.Continuous cropp-ingobstacle occurred in the 10 years with the index decreased,such as average height,pseudostem diameter,diameter of garlic bulb and individual garlic fresh weight.There was no significant difference between 10 years continuous cropping and 20 years,but when continue to 30 years,the continuous cropping obstacles appeared more obvious.At the same time,the chlorophyll content and superoxide dismutase (SOD),peroxidase (POD) activity were reduced notably except catalase (CAT) with different continuous cropping years.In conclusion,with nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium sufficiently supplied,continuous cropping decreased the photosynthetic properties and antioxidant enzyme activity of garlic,continuous croppingobstacle occurred in short-term (10 years) and more serious in long-term (30 years),therefore,the harm of continuous cropping obstacle would be reduced by crop rotation.

References:

 

[1]邵秀丽,张丹,张慎璞,.中牟大蒜标准化生产施肥技术配方研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(19):172-175.

[2]吴凤芝,赵凤艳,刘元英.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J].东北农业大学学报,2000,31(3):241-247.

[3]危锋,郝明德.黄土旱塬长期施肥对小麦连作土壤养分和水分的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(4):104-109,116.

[4]吴硕,王鹏飞,李传本,.玉米连作和长期施肥效应[J].土壤通报,1996,27(2):67-69.

[5]聂立孝.旱稻连作障碍的成因及其调控[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2008.

[6]苗淑杰,乔云发,韩晓增.大豆连作障碍的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(3):203-206.

[7]王曌.连作对棉花生长生理效应及硫肥对连作调控效应的研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2013.

[8]刘亚锋.黄瓜连作障碍主要因子关系分析及其作用机理研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2006.

[9]王芳.茄子连作障碍机理研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2003.

[10]张江红.酚类物质对苹果的化感作用及重茬障碍影响机理的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2005.

[11]赵培强.黄芪(Astragalus membranaceus)连作障碍的研究[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2009.

[12]刘素慧.大蒜连作障碍形成机理及EM缓解效应的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2011.

[13]李敏.大蒜连作对土壤微生物区系、理化性状及根系分泌物的影响[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2012.

[14]尉辉.大蒜连作障碍的主要表现及EM菌剂调节的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2011.

[15]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:134-165.

[16]陈晓红,邹志荣.温室蔬菜栽培连作障碍研究现状及防治措施[J].陕西农业科学,2002(12):16-17,20.

[17]刘素慧,刘世琦,张自坤,.EM对连作大蒜根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(3):718-723.

[18]贾茹,张迪,马晓东,.大蒜连作障碍研究进展[J].北方园艺,2014(19):207-210.

[19]张子龙,王文全.植物连作障碍的形成机制及其调控技术研究进展[J].生物学杂志,2010,27(5):69-72.

[20]王才斌,吴正锋,成波,.连作对花生光合特性和活性氧代谢的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(8):1304-1309.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-04-25