|Table of Contents|

Effect of Planting Transgenic Tomatoes on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Nutrient in Greenhouse(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年20
Page:
159-164
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Planting Transgenic Tomatoes on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Nutrient in Greenhouse
Author(s):
LI Hailing; CAO Xin; HA Siqimeige; SUN Wanhong
(Center of Experiment，Northwest University for Nationalities，Lanzhou，Gansu 730030)
Keywords:
:tomato; transgenic plant; soil physicochemical properties; soil nutrient
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201520040
Abstract:
Taking greenhouses soil of planting non-transgenic tomatoes and transgenic tomatoes long-term in middle region of Gansu Province as tested materials，the greenhouses soils (0-20 cm) were collected respectively at seedling，flowering and fruiting stage of tomato，the physicochemical properties and nutrient of soils were compared between planting non-transgenic tomatoes and transgenic tomatoes.The results showed that in soil physicochemical properties，planting non-transgenic tomatoes，the soil pH value was declining during the whole growth period.And planting transgenic tomatoes，the soil pH value was declining during seeding period，but which was rising after seeding period and close to CK at the end of growth period.The relative variation of soil pH value of planting transgenic tomatoes was significantly (P<0.01) below than planting non-transgenic tomatoes.Planting two kinds of tomatoes，the total amount of water soluble salt in soil was increasing at first but declining later.The relative variation of the total amount of water soluble salt in soil of planting transgenic tomato was significantly (P<0.01) below than planting non-transgenic tomatoes at seedling，flowering and fruiting stage.Planting two kinds of tomatoes，the soil organic matter content was decreasing continuously，and the differences of relative changes at each growth stage was not significant (P>0.05).In soil nutrient，planting two kinds of tomatoes，the content of total phosphorus，available phosphorus，total nitrogen，hydrolyze nitrogen，and available potassium was decreasing continuously.The difference of relative changes of planting transgenic tomato was significantly (P<0.05) and highly significantly (P<0.01) below than planting non-transgenic tomato at seedling and fruiting stage，respectively.Except the differences of relative changes of soil nutrient at each growth stage were not significant (P>0.05).It suggested that the greenhouses in this region could continuously plant transgenic tomato in few years under the condition of appropriate adjusting the soil salt content and scientific fertilizing.

References:

 

[1]钱海丰,胡宝兰.转基因作物发展现状与生态安全性[J].现代化农业,2001(10):14-15.

[2]王小萱.全球转基因作物面积日益扩展,我国转基因作物发展机遇几何[N].中国食品报,2011-3-21(3).

[3]黄永芬,汪清胤,付桂荣.美洲拟鲽抗冻蛋白基因(afp)导入番茄的研究[J].生物化学杂志,1997,13(4):418-422.

[4]孙彩霞,张玉兰,缪璐,等.转Bt基因作物种植对土壤养分含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(5):943-946.

[5]袁红旭,张建中,郭建夫,等.种植转双价抗真菌基因水稻对根际微生物群落及酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(1):122-126.

[6]王建武,冯远娇,骆世明.Bt玉米秸秆分解对土壤酶活性和土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):524-528.

[7]陈丰.富含硫氨基酸转基因大豆对根际土壤元素含量和微生物群落多样性的影响[J].大豆科学,2012(4):259-265.

[8]刘继鹏.Bt蛋白对水稻土反硝化作用和微生物多样性的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2013.

[9]愈元春,冷春龙,舒洪歲,等.转基因抗虫棉对土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,2011,35(5):21-24.

[10]党辉.抗旱转基因玉米开花期耐旱性鉴定及其土壤理化性质的安全性评价[D].重庆：重庆师范大学,2013.

[11]王忠华,王茵.Bt水稻“克螟稻”稻米毒理性评价研究初报[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(12):1487-1492.

[12]吴刚,李俊生,肖能文,等.转基因水稻对土壤理化性质的影响[J].湖北植保,2012(6):22-25.

[13]宋亚娜,苏军,陈睿,等.转cry1Ac/cpti基因水稻对土壤酶活性和养分有效性的影响[J].生物安全学报,2011,20(3):243-248.

[14]颜世磊.转基因玉米对土壤微生物活性和肥力的影响[D].济南:山东师范大学，2011.

[15]冷春龙.转基因抗虫棉对土壤肥力质量的影响[D].南京:南京林业大学,2007.

[16]娜布其,赵建宁,李刚,等.转双价(Bt+CpTI)棉种植对土壤速效养分和酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):930-937.

[17]魏霞.转crylAb/c基因水稻对根际土壤微生物生态的影响研究[D].武汉：华中农业大学,2013.

[18]刘红梅,赵建宁,黄永春,等.种植转双价基因(Bt+CpTI)棉对主要土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].棉花学报,2012,24(2):133-139.

[19]张美俊,杨武德.转基因棉种植对根际土壤生物学特性和养分含量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(1):162-166.

[20]王建武,冯远娇.种植Bt玉米对土壤微生物活性和肥力的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1213-1220.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-11-20