|Table of Contents|

Reason Analysis and Protective Measures of Temporary Planting SH40 Interstock Apple Seedling Water Loss During the Period of Dormancy(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年16
Page:
17-21
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Reason Analysis and Protective Measures of Temporary Planting SH40 Interstock Apple Seedling Water Loss During the Period of Dormancy
Author(s):
ZHANG DanZHANG HeSHAO JianzhuSUN Jianshe
(College of Horticulture,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000)
Keywords:
SH40 interstocksapple seedlingdormant temporary plantingdehydration
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201516004
Abstract:
Currently,SH40 is the major application of apple dwarfing rootstocks in North China.During the production,SH40 interstocks segment apple seedling temporary planted would have the phenomena that loss water and occurs wrinkles at interstocks segment first and then even expand to the whole plant after the spring thaw soil,which is prejudicial to the production extremely.In this study,annual winter hibernation Fuji/SH40/Robusta was used as material and the reasons that the temporary planting SH40 interstocks apple seedling loss water in interstocks first during dormancy were studied.The results showed that,the reason that temporary planting SH40 interstocks seedling loss water at interstocks first during the dormancy period had not much relations to its varietal characteristics;the transpiration of roots system was a major reason that cause the interstocks segment loss water and occurs wrinkles first,and when the root lack water as well as the transpiration was large,there was a water potential difference in the conduit,which forced the migration in interstocks move to the roots reversely.Meanwhile,the larger root system was,the faster water loss rate was and the dehydration wrinkle was much more serious as well;the threshold that the interstocks and scion could rehydration successful was 20% of water loss rate,and the seedling cannot survive beyond the threshold.

References:

 

[1]邵开基,李登科,张忠仁,.SH系列苹果矮化砧性状及生理特性的研究[J].园艺学报,1991,18(4):289-295.

[2]韩明玉,李丙智.陕西苹果矮化砧木调查与思考[J].西北园艺,2012(8):50-52.

[3]李丙智,韩明玉,张林森,.我国苹果矮化砧木应用现状及适应性调查[J].果农之友,2010(2):35-36.

[4]贾鳞厚.矮生果树及其研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.

[5]王中英.苹果矮化中间砧段对14C光合产物运转的研究[J].山西果树,1986(2):5-8.

[6]邵开基,牛自勉,张忠仁,.苹果砧木矮化程度与ABA含量的关系[J].园艺学报,1987,14(1):7-11.

[7]韩明玉,马锋旺,李丙智,.意大利法国苹果发展情况[J].西北园艺,2008(1):49-50.

[8]邵开基,李登科,张忠仁,.SH系列苹果矮化砧性状及生理特性的研究[J].园艺学报,1991,18(4):289-295.

[9]梅立新,蒋宝,赵政阳,.几种方法测定苹果矮化砧木枝条抗寒性指标的比较[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(6):103-106.

[10]马宝焜,徐继忠,骆德新,.不同矮化中间砧红富士苹果越冬期间枝条内水分变化与抽条的关系[J].河北农业大学学报,1999,22(4):34-37.

[11]张力君,彭运翔,王永生.偃麦草属3种植物的持水力和蒸腾速率[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(5):68-70.

[12]于秋香,邵建柱,徐继忠.苹果砧木杂交后代皮孔性状与抗轮纹病菌侵染的关系[J].河北农业大学学报,2010,33(2):21-25.

[13]杨敏生.白杨双杂交种新无性系抗旱性,生理基础及苗期鉴定的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,1996.

[14]张力君,彭运翔,王永生.偃麦草属3种植物的持水力和蒸腾速率[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(5):68-70.

[15]施征,史胜青,肖文发,.脱水胁迫对梭梭和胡杨苗叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(4):566-570.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-09-01