|Table of Contents|

Study on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Grape Under Different Irrigation Conditions(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年14
Page:
1-6
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Grape Under Different Irrigation Conditions
Author(s):
LI Yashan2; LI Hua1; XU Chengdong2; WANG Bo2; WANG Zhenji2; FAN Shuguo2
(1.College of Enology，Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100；2.Department of Chemistry and Life Science，Chuxiong Normal University，Chuxiong，Yunnan 675000)
Keywords:
grape; irrigation method; net photosynthetic rate; stomatal conductance; transpiration rate; apparent quantum efficiency; light-response curve of photosynthesis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201514001
Abstract:
Four irrigation methods，concluding full irrigation (FI)，part root-zone irrigation (PRD)，early deficit (ED)，late deficit (LD)，were used to study on the photosynthetic characteristics of grape leaves beginning after bud.Then the photosynthetic parameters was measured and photosynthetic characteristics during mature period was analyzed.The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate (Pn)，stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of grape leaves of FI and ED were higher than the leaves of PRD and LD，while the water use efficiency (WUE) of FI and ED were lower than PRD and LD.The light compensation point (LCP) and dark respiratory rate (Rd) of FI and PRD were lower than ED and LD.And the light saturation point (LSP) of PRD was the least，while the net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax) of FI was the highest.Modified rectangular hyperbola model was better than rectangular hyperbola and non-rectangular hyperbola in fitting light-response curve of photosynthesis，especially in the result of LSP.The apparent quantum efficiency (AQY) and Rd acquired by linear fitting under lower levels of light intensity (PAR≤200 μmol?m-2?s-1) were lower than non-linear fitting under PAR≤2 000 μmol?m-2?s-1，and the later was more close to measured value.Considering the economic and ecologic benefits，the LD and PRD were the better irrigation methods.

References:

 

[1]李华.葡萄栽培学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2008：10-20.

[2]綦伟,李瑞臣,徐月华,等.葡萄抗旱性研究进展[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2005(3)：33-36.

[3]山仑,邓西平,张岁岐.生物节水研究现状及展望[J].中国科学基金,2006(2)：66-71.

[4]INTRIGLIOLO D S，PREZ D，RISCO D，et al.Yield components and grape composition responses to seasonal water deficits in Tempranillo grapevines[J].Irrigation Science，2012,30：339-349.

[5]LOPES C M，SANTOS T P，MONTEIROA A，et al.Combining cover cropping with deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean low vigor vineyard[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2011,129：603-612.

[6]SANTESTEBAN L G，MIRANDA C，ROYO J B.Regulated deficit irrigation effects on growth，yield，grape quality and individual anthocyanin composition in Vitis vinifera L.cv.‘Tempranillo’[J].Agricultural Water Management,2011,98：1171-1179.

[7]PONI S，BERNIZZONI F，CIVARDI S.Response of “Sangiovese” grapevines to partial root-zone drying：Gas-exchange，growth and grape composition[J].ScientiaHorticulturae,2007,114：96-103.

[8]DU T，KANG S，ZHANG J，et al.Water use efficiency and fruit quality of table grape underalternate partial root-zone drip irrigation[J].Agricultral Water Management,2008,95：659-668.

[9]杜太生,康绍忠,夏桂敏,等.滴灌条件下不同根区交替湿润对葡萄生长和水分利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(11)：43-48.

[10]TUITTILA E S，VASANDER H，LAINE J.Sensitivity of C sequestration in reintroduced Sphagnum to water-Level variation in a cutaway peatland[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12(4)：483-493.

[11]许大全.光合作用测定及研究中一些值得注意的问题[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,42(6)：1163-1167.

[12]叶子飘,于强.一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007,38(6)：771-775.

[13]叶子飘,于强.光合作用光响应模型的比较[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(6)：1356-1361.

[14]MIKO U F K，GRAHAM D F.Investigation of the CO2 dependence of quantum yield and respiration in eucalyptus pauciflora[J].Plant Physiology,1987,83(4)：1032-1036.

[15]THORNLEY J H M.Dynamic model of leaf photosynthesis with acclimation to light and nitrogen[J].Annals of Botany,1998,81(3)：421-430.

[16]郎莹,张光灿,张征坤,等.不同土壤水分下山杏光合作用光响应过程及其模拟[J].生态学报，2011,31(16)：4499-4508.

[17]韩瑞锋,李建明,胡晓辉,等.甜瓜幼苗叶片光合变化特性[J].生态学报,2012,32(5)：1471-1480.

[18]张力文,钟国成,张利,等.3种鼠尾草植物光合作用—光响应特性研究[J].草业学报,2012,21(2)：70-76.

[19]JUNQUERA P，LISSARRAGUE J R，JIMNEZ L，et al.Long-term effects of different irrigation strategies on yield components，vine vigour，and grape composition in cv.Cabernet-Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.)[J].Irrigation Science,2012,30：351-361.

[20]WILLIAMS L E，GRIMES D W，PHENE C J.The effects of applied water at various fractions of measured evapotranspiration on water relations and vegetative growth of Thompson Seedless grapevines[J].Irrigation Science,2010,28：221-232.

[21]NETZER Y，YAO C，SHENKER M，et al.Water use and the development of seasonal crop coefficients for superior seedless grapevines trained to an open-gable trellis system[J].Irrigation Science,2009,27(2)：109-120.

[22]房玉林,惠竹梅,陈洁,等.水分胁迫对葡萄光合特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(2)：135-138.

[23]管雪强,赵世杰,李德全,等.干旱胁迫下抑制光呼吸对‘赤霞珠’葡萄光抑制的影响[J].园艺学报,2004,31(4)：433-436.

[24]刘世秋,张振文,惠竹梅,等.干旱胁迫对酿酒葡萄赤霞珠光合特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(5)：169-172.

[25]吴彦琼,胡玉佳.外来植物南美蟛蜞菊,裂叶牵牛和五爪金龙的光合特性[J].生态学报,2004(10)：2334-2339.

[26]惠竹梅,焦旭亮,张振文.渭北旱塬‘赤霞珠’葡萄浆果膨大期光合特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2008,36(4)：111-116.

[27]郑睿,康绍忠,胡笑涛,等.水氮处理对荒漠绿洲区酿酒葡萄光合特性与产量的影响[J].农业工程学报，2013,29(4)：133-141.

[28]周兴本,刘士冲,郭修武,等.不同水分条件下无核白鸡心葡萄光合日变化[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(12)：182-184.

[29]杜太生,康绍忠,张霁,等.不同沟灌模式对沙漠绿洲区葡萄生长和水分利用的效应[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(5)：805-810.

[30]周磊,甘毅,欧晓彬,等.作物缺水补偿节水的分子生理机制研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(1)：217-225.

[31]房林,张振文,贾媛媛,等.杨凌地区3个葡萄品种光合特性比较[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(5)：203-208.

[32]李雅善,李华,王华,等.赤霞珠葡萄光合-光响应曲线拟合模型的比较分析[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(2)：20-25.

[33]〖JP4〗余叔文.植物生理学和分子生物学[M].北京：科学出版社,1992：236-243.

[34] 黄秦军,黄国伟,丁昌俊,等.美洲黑杨杂种不同生长势无性系光合特征[J].林业科学,2013,49(3)：56-62.

[35]常青山,张利霞,陈煜,等.菊花黄绿叶突变体的光合与类囊体膜光谱[J].林业科学,2013,49(2)：72-78.

[36]种培芳,苏世平,高暝,等.4个地理种源白刺气体交换特性比较[J].草业学报,2013,22(2)：307-312.

[37]梁开明,曹洪麟,徐志防,等.台湾青枣及野生种的光合作用日变化及光响应特征[J].园艺学报,2008,35(6)：793-798.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-08-11