|Table of Contents|

Research on Effect of Reducing Temperature and Increasing Humidity of 15 Greenery Trees in Kunming City(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年13
Page:
76-80
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on Effect of Reducing Temperature and Increasing Humidity of 15 Greenery Trees in Kunming City
Author(s):
FENG Chengcheng1JIANG Yonglei1TANG Tan1LI Taibing2HUANG Xiaoxia1
1.Institute of Landscape Architecture,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming,Yunnan 650224;2.Sichuan Institute of Forestry,Chengdu,Sichuan 610081
Keywords:
Kunming cityroad green spacegreening tree speciesreducing temperature and increasing air humidity
PACS:
S 684
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201513023
Abstract:
Taking 15 common greenery trees in four main roads of Kunming city as the experiment materials,through the field investigation and measurement,their effect of reducing temperature and increasing humidity were analyzed and compared.The results showed that the reducing temperature and increasing humidity capacities were very difference in different tree species,and the Cinnamomum glanduliferum was reached the best effect among the 15 tree species.Its amount of release water was reached by 1 195.56 g/m2 per day,and the reducing temperature degree was 0.22℃ per day;The Hedera nepalensis’reducing temperature effect reached the lowest degree,which was only 0.09℃ per day;And the amount of release water of Magnolia grandiflora only reached 505.44 g/m2 per day;the reducing temperature and increasing humidity capacity was varied significantly for different species in the same road,also for the same species in different roads.The order of the reducing temperature effect of these 15 species were as follows:Cinnamomum glanduliferum (0.22℃)>Cinnamomum camphora (0.21℃)>Cinnamomum pedunculatum (0.157℃)>Ligustrum quihoui (0.15℃)> Prunus cerasifera (0.14℃)> Photinia serrulata (0.13℃)> Celtis kunmingensis (0.12℃)> Ginkgo biloba (0.118℃)>Fatsia japonica (0.11℃)>Ficus concinna(0.10℃)> Hedera nepalensis (0.09℃).However,the reducing temperature effect reached about 0.09℃ among the Rhododendron simsii,Magnolia grandiflora, Camellia sasanqua and Camellia japonica,which had little difference.The order of the increasing humidity effects of these 15 species were as follows:Cinnamomum glanduliferum(1 195.56 g/m2)>Cinnamomum camphora(1 086.39 g/m2)>Prunus cerasifera(749.16 g/m2)> Ligustrum quihoui (743.31 g/m2)>Cinnamomum japonicum (726.66 g/m2)>Photinia serrulata (698.94 g/m2)> Celtis kunmingensis (664.56 g/m2)> Fatsia japonica (623.52 g/m2)>Ginkgo biloba(617.58 g/m2)>Rhododendron simsii(586.98 g/m2)>Ficus concinna (580.02 g/m2)>Camellia sasanqua (539.46 g/m2)>Camellia japonica(524.70 g/m2)>Hedera nepalensis(506.52 g/m2)> Magnolia grandiflora (505.44 g/m2).On the whole,the reducing temperature and increasing humidity capacity of these species were as follows:Evergreen trees>Deciduous trees>shrubs.In conclusion,the species with higher reducing temperature and increasing humidity capacity,such as evergreen trees,were maily supposed to choose,in order to beautify the environment and increase the reducing temperature and increasing humidity effect significantly.

References:

[1]任国玉,初子莹,周雅清,等.中国气温变化研究最新进展气候与环境研究[J].气候与环境研究,2005,10(4):701-715.[2]李建龙,黄良美,黄玉源,等.城市不同绿地生境小气候的时空变异规律分析[J].城市绿地与城市生态,2007,20(1):29-34.[3]师莉娟.浅谈住宅区立体绿化的必要性[J].太原科技,1999(增):8-9.[4]杨士弘.市生态环境学[M].北京:北京科学出版社,1991.[5]刘江丽.昆明城区绿化植物秋冬季常见病虫害及防治[J].中国园艺文摘,2012(4):80-81.[6]陈兴祥.昆明市城市绿化树种选择[J].林业调查规划,2005,30(5):104-107.[7]林学椿,于淑秋.近40年我国气候趋势[J].气象,1990,16(10):16-22.[8]佟潇,李雪.沈阳市5种绿化树种固碳释氣与降温增湿效应研究[J].辽宁林业科技,2010(3):14-16.[9]陆贵巧,谢宝元,谷建才,等.人连市常见绿化树种蒸腾降温的效应分析[J].河北农业大学学报.2006,29(2):65-67.[10]陈少鹏,庄倩倩,郭太君,等.长春市园林树木固碳释氧与增湿降温效应研究[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(4):750-756.[11]王雁.14种地被植物光能利用特性及耐阴性比较[J].浙江林学院学报,2005,22(1):6-11.[12]刘振威,孙丽,马杰,等.校园内不同绿化树种片林生态效应研究[J].生态学报,2005(11):262-267.[13]刘海荣.沈阳市常用灌木固碳释氧降温增湿能力研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2007.[14]宋丽华,曹兵,吴李.银川市几种绿化树种降温增湿效应的比较[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(3):46-48.[15]马秀枝,李长生,陈高娃,等.校园内行道树不同树种降温增湿效应研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2011,32(1):125-130.[16]韩鹏,何平,韩轶.呼和浩特市市区绿地景观生态规划研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2007,28(2):17-21.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-08-21