|Table of Contents|

Effect of Drought Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Fragaria orientalis(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年13
Page:
40-43
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Drought Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Fragaria orientalis
Author(s):
GUO SijiaZHU YufeiLIU Dongyun
College of Gardens and Tourism,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000
Keywords:
Fragaria orientalisdrought stressphysiological index
PACS:
S 668.4
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201513011
Abstract:
Taking Fragaria orientalis as test material,the morphological indexes variation,together with the water content of soil,the water content of leaf,the activity of the super oxide dismutase(SOD),the activity of the peroxidase(POD),the content of the malondialdehyde(MDA),the relative permeability of membrane,the content of proline and the content of soluble protein under drought stress were researched,in order to investigate the adaptation of Fragaria orientalis to drought stress.The results showed that Fragaria orientalis had strong tolerance to drought stress.After 25 days of drought stress,the activities of SOD and POD,the MDA content,the relative conductivity,the content of proline and the content of soluble protein showed a continuous increase trend and were 46.60%,53.05%,60.00%,79.61%,55.07%,57.14% higher respectively than that of the control.

References:

[1]冯道俊.植物水涝胁迫研究进展[J].中国水运,2006,6(10):253-254.[2]周玉迁,李滨胜,李永辉,等.地被植物委蔓陵菜和东方草莓的耐荫性研究[J].中国西部科技,2010,9(15):37,86.[3]史树德,孙亚卿,魏磊.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2011:126-142.[4]张以顺,黄霞,陈云凤.植物生理学实验教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009:77-78.[5]韩瑞宏.苗期紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫的适应机制研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.[6]蒋理.几种地被植物抗旱性比较及园林应用研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.[7]王宝山,赵思齐.干旱对小麦幼苗膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的关系[J].山东师范大学学报,1987(1):29-32.[8]聂华堂,陈竹生.水分胁迫下柑橘的生理变化和抗旱性关系[J].中国农业科学,1991,16(2):126-130.[9]武宝.小麦幼苗中超氧化物歧化酶与幼苗脱水忍耐力相关性的研究[J].植物学报,1985(27):152-155.[10]Wang X,Hou P,Yin L K,et al.Effect of soil moisture stress on the menbrane protective enzyme and the membrane liquid peroxidation of tamarix[J].Arid Zone Res,2002,19(3):17-20.[11]赵世杰,许长成,邹琦,等.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210.[12]王爱国,邵从本,罗广华.丙二醛作为植物脂质过氧化指标的探讨[J].植物生理学通讯,1986(2):55-57.[13]韩玉林,孙桂弟,黄苏珍.干旱胁迫对莺尾属5种观赏地被植物部分生理代谢的影响[J].园林花卉,2006(6):96-98.[14]钱春,刘素君,尹克林.水分胁迫对草每膜保护系统的影响[J].西南农业大学学报,2005,27(4):541-546.[15]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[16]Bajin M,Kinet J M,Luttes S. The use of electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2002,36:61-70.[17]陈珂.蛇莓等四种地被植物抗旱性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2008.[18]苏日古嘎.禾本科牧草抗旱、耐寒、耐贫瘠特性比较研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2007.[19]王海珍,梁宗锁,韩蕊莲,等.辽东栋幼苗对土壤干旱的生理生适应性研究[J].植物研究,2005,23(1):106-110.[20]康俊梅,杨青川,樊奋成.干旱对苜蓿叶片可溶性蛋白的影响[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):199-202.[21]刘玲玲,李军,李长辉,等.马铃薯可溶性蛋白、叶绿素及ATP含量变化与品种抗旱性关系的研究[J].中国马铃薯,2004,18(4):201-204.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-08-20