|Table of Contents|

Comparative Analysis of Induction and Somatic Embryo genesis of Different Origin in Sorbus pohuashanesis Hedl.(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2014年13期
Page:
102-105
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Induction and Somatic Embryo genesis of Different Origin in Sorbus pohuashanesis Hedl.
Author(s):
ZHANG Jian-ying1XU Chuan-ling2SHEN Hai-long3YANG Ling3LI Jing1TIAN Xin-hua1
1.Forestry Research Institute of Heilongjiang Province,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150080;
2.Dunhua Forestry Bureau,Dunhua,Jilin 133700;
3.College of Forestry,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150040
Keywords:
Sorbus pohuashanesisinduction of callussomatic embryogenesisoriginplant growth regulators
PACS:
S 718.43
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking the mature and immature zygotic embryos of Sorbus pohuashanensis Hedl.as explants, the effect of areas,development time and combinations of plant growth regulators on the induction of somatic embryos and callus induction were studied.The results showed that mature zygotic embryos were used as explants,the effect of MS+2.0 mg/L NAA+1.5 mg/L 6-BA on callus induction and somatic embryogenesis was good.Different origin of somatic embryogenesis differences for Dunhua>Harbin>Wuying>Shanhe.In order to immature zygotic embryos as explants,MS+0.05 mg/L 2,4-D+1.0 mg/L 6-BA callus induction rate was high,somatic embryogenesis in MS+2,4-D 0.2 mg/L+1.0 mg/L 6-BA was the most suitable.Different origin of somatic embryogenesis differences for Yanji>Harbin>Yichun.

References:

[1]周德本.东北园林树木栽培[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1986:114-116.
[2]周以良.黑龙江树木志[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1986:334-335.
[3]Nebe W,Opfermann M.The nutrition of mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia L.) as compared to beech Sorbus aucuparia  L.)[J].Forst and Holz,1998,53(2):48-50.
[4]于春江,于长延,李殿波.绿化树木花楸树及其栽培技术[J].中国林副特产,1998(2):21.
[5]Schmidt G.Comparative studies of the rooting capacity of softwood cuttings taken from different parts of the stock plants,on the example of two Hungarian Sorbus cultivars[J].Horticultural Science,1997,29(1/2):67-69.
[6]沈海龙.植物组织培养[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005:107-109.
[7]任军.不同母树来源花楸种苗生理生态特性的研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2006.
[8]刘玮,李长海,宿宗艳.花楸引种及繁育技术研究[J].黑龙江省生态职业学院学报,2006(1):18-19. 
[9]Preece J E,Bates S.Somatic embryognensis in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.)[M].In:Jain S,Gupta P and Newton (eds.).Somatic Embryogenensis in Woody Plants,1995:311-325.
[10]陈金慧,王洪云,诸葛强,等.林木体胚发生技术进展[J].林业科技开发,2000,14(3):9-11.
[11]施季森.迎接21世纪现代林木生物技术育种的挑战[J].南京林业大学学报,2000,24(1):1-6.
[12]李晓方.一种水稻综合性状良好的种群、品种的选育方法[P].中国:ZL02152197.2.2005-06-22.
[13]李晓方.水稻遗传多样性育种体系创新[C].中国青年农业科学学术年会报,2004:46-52.
[14]赵平娟,孙海彦,彭明.植物体胚成苗培养的研究进展[J].现代农业科学,2009,16(5):31-33.
[15]杨玲,沈海龙,刘春苹,等.花楸合子胚诱导体细胞胚胎发生研究[J].植物研究,2010,30(2):174-179.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-02