|Table of Contents|

Influence of Different Planting Densities on Photosynthetic and Fluorescent Characteristics of Korla Fragrant Pear(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2014年06期
Page:
27-31
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Influence of Different Planting Densities on Photosynthetic and Fluorescent Characteristics of Korla Fragrant Pear
Author(s):
ZHAO Jing1QIN Wei-ming2LI Long-fei1LI Jie1LI Jiang1
1.College of Forestry and Horticulture,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052;
2.Shayidong Horticulture Farm,Xinjiang Bayingulun Mongolia Autonomous Prefecture,Korla,Xinjiang 841000
Keywords:
Korla Fragrant pearplanting densityphotosynthetic characteristicschlorophyⅡ fluorescence
PACS:
S 661.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking 20-year-old Koral Fragrant pear as material,with Li-6400 photosynthetic apparatus,the net photosynthetic rate (Pn),transpiration rate (Tr),intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci),stomatal conductance (Gs) under three different planting densities (3 m×5 m,4 m×5 m,5 m×6 m) were measured and analyzed;using Pulse-amplitude Modulation fluorometer,OS-30P,the initial fluorescence(Fo),maximal fluorescence(Fm),maximal efficiency of primary conversion of light energy of PSII(Fv/Fm),maximal potential of primary conversion of light energy of PSII(Fv/Fo) were measured too.The main aim of this study was to compare photosynthetic and fluorescent characteristics of Koral Fragrant pear under different densities,and choose a appropriate planting density.The results showed that different planting density had a great influence on photosynthetic characteristics of fragrant pear,there were not significant differences in Gs,Fo among the three processing and the differences in PnTr、CiFmFv/FmFv/Fo were extremely significant.The Pn of 4 m×5 m was the highest,whereas 3 m×5 m was the lowest.Fv/Fm day average performance for 4 m×5 m was higher than 5 m×6 m,but less than 3 m×5 m.The experiment showed that 20-year-old Koral Fragrant pear’s under three planting density of which 4 m×5 m was the strongest,5 m×6 m was the second and 3 m×5 m was the weakest.

References:

[1]高启明,侯江涛,李疆.库尔勒香梨生产现状与研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(2):233-236.

[2]陈凯,章文才,刘义权,.栽植密度对柑橘树光合生产、生长和结实的影响[J].果树学,1992,9(3):138-143.

[3]梅闯,罗淑萍,徐敏,.库尔勒香梨3种树形光合特性的比较[J].新疆农业大学学报,2011,34(2):115-118.

[4]王世伟,潘存德,张大海,.新疆11个杏品种叶绿素荧光特征比较[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(4):637-643.

[5]白杰,潘存德,胡安鸿,.新疆6个核桃品种叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].西北林学学报,2010,25(6):13-18.

[6]沈宗根,陈翠琴,王岚岚,.3种石斛光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(10):2067-2073.

[7]梅闯.库尔勒香梨不同树形光合特性研究及果实品质观测[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2012.

[8]张琦,张玉星,陈玉娟.库尔勒香梨光合特性的研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2006,29(6):29-32.

[9]王晶晶,李铭,陈奇凌,.不同栽植密度对骏枣花期叶片光合特性的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(9):1592-1596.

[10]路兴慧,潘存德.新疆7种城市园林绿化树种叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].新疆农业大学学报,2008,31(5):1-6.

[11]许大全.光合作用效率[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:32-33.


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-10