|Table of Contents|

Research on the Root Physiological Characteristics of Medicago sativa L.Seedling Under Salt Stress(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2014年05期
Page:
68-72
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on the Root Physiological Characteristics of Medicago sativa L.Seedling Under Salt Stress
Author(s):
JIANG Chao1XIA Yang2YANG Ke-qiang1
1.College of Forestry,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai’an,Shandong 272100;
2.Shandong Academy of Forestry,Jinan,Shandong 250000
Keywords:
Medicago sativa L.salt resistancerootphysiological characteristics
PACS:
S 551+.7
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking two cultivars of Medicago sativa L. ‘Algonquin’ (salt resistance) and ‘Crown’ (salt susceptible) as materials,under hydroponic conditions,effect of root activity and malonaldehyde content,proline content,soluble protein content under different NaCl concentration (0,100,200 mmol/L NaCl) and stress time(0,2,4,6,8,10,12 d) of two cultivars of Medicago sativa L.seedlings were measured,the changes of related physiological indicators were analysed.The results showed that with the increase of stress salinity and the number of days,the root activity of Medicago sativa L. presented significant decreasing trend,the root physiological indicators containing malonaldehyde content,proline content,soluble protein content showed significantly trend of first increased and then decreased,but increasing trend of high salinity was significantly bigger than increasing trend of low salinity.The principal component analysis showed that proline and soluble protein could be better representative of the salt patience of Medicago sativa L..

References:

[1]王善仙,刘宛,李培军,.盐碱土植物改良研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(24):1-7.

[2]Dupuy L,Fourcaud T,Stokes A.A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage[J].Plant and Soil,2005,278(1/2):119-134.

[3]Dupuy L,Fourcaud T,Stokes A.A numerical investigation into factors affecting the anchorage of roots in tension[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2005,56(3):319-327.

[4]弋良朋,王祖伟.盐胁迫下3种滨海盐生植物的根系生长和分[J].生态学报,2011,31(5):1195-1202.

[5]Kumar A,Bahadur B,Sharma B K.Influence of salts on the gremaintion and seldig growth of hordeumvulare L[J].Annals Arid Zone,1988,27:65-69.

[6]袁晓华,杨中汉.植物生理生化实验[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1983:128-133.

[7]陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002.

[8]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:167-260.

[9]柳新红,何小勇,苏冬梅,.翅荚木种源抗寒性综合评价体系的构建与应用[J].林业科学,2007,43(10):45-50.

[10]张晓磊,刘晓静,齐敏兴,.混合盐碱对紫花苜蓿苗期根系特征的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(3):340-346.

[11]姚彩艳,汪晓丽,盛海君,.NaClPEG胁迫对玉米幼苗根系生长的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2007,28(4):42-46.

[12]廖岩,彭友贵,陈桂珠.植物耐盐性机理研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):2077-2099.

[13]Levitt J.Responses of plant to environmental stress chilling,freezing,and high temperature stresses[M].second ed. New York:Academic Press,1980:17-20.

[14]张润花,郭世荣,李娟.盐胁迫对黄瓜根系活力、叶绿素含量的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2006(2):47-49.

[15]李磊,赵檀方,胡延吉.大麦苗期耐盐性鉴定指标的研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,1998,15(4):53-57.

[16]丁玉梅,龙海,晓罡,.干旱胁迫下马铃薯叶片脯氨酸、量变化及与耐旱性的相关性分析[J].西南农业学报,2013,26(1):105-109.

[17]王贺正,马均,李旭毅,.水分胁迫对水稻结实期活性氧产生和保护系统的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(7):1379-1387.

[18]Wang B S,Luttge U,Ratajczak R.Effects of salt treatment and osmotic stress on V-ATPase and V-PPase in leaves of the halophyte Suaeda salsa[J].Exp Bot,2001,52:2355-2365.

[19]李彦,张英鹏,孙明,.盐分胁迫对植物的影响及植物耐盐机理研究进展[J].植物生理科学,2008,24(1):258-265.

[20]王爱国.丙二醛作为脂质过氧化指标的探讨[J].植物生理学通讯,1986(2):55-57.

[21]吴幼容,郑郁善.观音竹对盐胁迫的生长及生理生化响应[J].福建林学院学报,2011,32(1):23-27.

[22]张志,刘敏,梁艳,.盐胁迫对3种冷季型草坪草生长的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(5):1877-1880.

[23]Daneshmand F,Arvin M J,Kalantari K M.Physiological responses to NaCl stress in three wild species of potato in vitro[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,201032(1):91-101.

[24]肖强,郑海雷,陈瑶.盐度对互花米草生长及脯氨酸、可溶性糖和蛋白质含量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(4):373-376.

[25]方志红,董宽虎.NaCl胁迫对碱蒿可溶性糖和可溶性蛋白含量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(16):147-149.

[26]杨颖丽,徐世键,保颖,.盐胁迫对两种小麦叶片蛋白质的影响[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(1):70-74.


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-09