|Table of Contents|

Response of Quality and Growth Characteristics of Medicago sativa for the Different Intensity of Cutting(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2014年21期
Page:
72-77
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Response of Quality and Growth Characteristics of Medicago sativa for the Different Intensity of Cutting
Author(s):
JIN Wen-bin1; ZHANG Fan-bing2
1.Training Offices of Armed Police in Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083；
2.Key Lab for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,College of Forestry,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083
Keywords:
Medicago sativa; cutting intensity; growth characteristics; quality
PACS:
S 812.5
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking Medicago sativa as material,the effect of different cutting intensities on the quality and growth characteristics of Medicago sativa were studied.The results showed that light cutting and moderate cutting could improve the ability of plant height and regeneration.Different intensities of cutting increased the aboveground,underground biomass and root cap ratio (R/S) of Medicago sativa,moderate cutting increased most significant,and the compensatory aboveground biomass of high cutting was the highest.With the increase of the intensity of cutting,the content of chlorophyll a increased,chlorophyll b content decreased and different cutting intensities increased the content of chlorophyll a and b comparing to pre-cutting,which could be very helpful for photosynthesis of Medicago sativa.Heavy cutting lead to the total length and mean diameter of plant roots decreased significantly (P<0.05),and moderate cutting increased the total length and mean diameter of plant roots (P<0.05).Cutting also affected the activities of plant roots comparing to pre-cutting.The average crude protein,crude fat,crude fiber,crude ash and nitrogen free extract showed that moderate cutting>light cutting>heavy cutting>control.Based on the comprehensive analysis of the indices,the optimum scheme for the quality and growth characteristics of Medicago sativa was proposed as moderate cutting in desert steppe.

References:

[1]Xu B,Yang X,Tao W,et al.Remote sensing monitoring upon the grass production in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(2):405-413.
[2]Ma Y,Fan S,Jiang D,et al.Study on the land desertification causes and the grass industry in North China[J].Arid Zone Research,2002,20(3):217-220.
[3]章家恩,刘文高,陈景青,等.不同刈割强度对牧草地上部和地下部生长性状的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1740-1744.
[4]章家恩,刘文高,陈景青,等.刈割对牧草地下部根区土壤养分及土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态环境,2005,14(3):387-391.
[5]Schnbach P,Wan H,Gierus M,et al.Grassland responses to grazing:effects of grazing intensity and management system in an Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystem[J].Plant and Soil,2011,340(1-2):103-115. [6]Socher S A,Prati D,Boch S,et al.Direct and productivity-mediated indirect effects of fertilization,mowing and grazing on grassland species richness[J].Journal of Ecology,2012,100(6):1391-1399.
[7]张璐璐,周晓松,李英年,等.刈割,施肥和浇水对矮嵩草补偿生长的影响[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(6):641-652. [8]马银山,杜国祯,张世挺.施肥和刈割对冷地早熟禾补偿生长的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(2):279-287.
[9]王海东,张璐璐,朱志红.刈割,施肥对高寒草甸物种多样性与生态系统功能关系的影响及群落稳定性机制[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(4):279-295.
[10]王鑫,马永祥,李娟.紫花苜蓿营养成分及主要生物学特性[J].草业科学,2003,20(10):39-40.
[11]孙建华,王彦荣,余玲.紫花苜蓿生长特性及产量性状相关性研究[J].草业学报,2004,13(4):80-86.
[12]孙德智,李凤山,杨恒山,等.刈割次数对紫花苜蓿翌年生长及草产量的影响[J].中国草地,2005,27(5):33-37. [13]郭正刚,刘慧霞,王彦荣.刈割对紫花苜蓿根系生长影响的初步分析[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(2):215-220. [14]贾倩民,陈彦云,韩润燕.荒漠草原区次生盐碱地4种牧草的适应性及生产性能研究[J].中国饲料,2013(18):11-15.
[15]宋乃平,杨新国,何秀珍,等.荒漠草原人工柠条林重建的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):21-26. [16]王常慧,杨建强,王永新,等.不同收获期及不同干燥方法对苜蓿草粉营养成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2004,16(2):60-64.
[17]黎磊,周道玮,盛连喜.植物种群自疏过程中构件生物量与密度的关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(13):3987-3997. [18]Weiner J,Freckleton R P.Constant final yield[J].Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics,2010,41:173-192.
[19]吕林有,赵艳,王海新,等.刈割对入侵植物少花蒺藜草再生生长及繁殖特性的影响[J].草业科学,2011,28(1):100-104.
[20]单立山,李毅,董秋莲,等.红砂根系构型对干旱的生态适应[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1283-1290.
[21]Tilman D.Resource competition and community structure[M].Princeton University Press,1982.
[22]Loreau M,Naeem S,Inchausti P,et al.Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:current knowledge and future challenges[J].Science,2001,294(5543):804-808.
[23]Tilman D,Wedin D,Knops J.Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems[J].Nature,1996,379(6567):718-720.
[24]李晓兵,陈云浩,张云霞,等.气候变化对中国北方荒漠草原植被的影响[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):254-261.
[25]胡小文,王彦荣,武艳培.荒漠草原植物抗旱生理生态学研究进展[J].草业学报,2004,13(3):9-15.
[26]Nichol C J,Huemmrich K F,Black T A,et al.Remote sensing of photosynthetic-light-use efficiency of boreal forest[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2000,101(2):131-142.
[27]Funk J L,Vitousek P M.Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems[J].Nature,2007,446(7139):1079-1081.
[28]朱珏,张彬,谭支良,等.刈割对牧草生物量和品质影响的研究进展[J].草业科学,2009,26(2):80-85.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-11-28