|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Drought and Heat Resistances for Festuca arundinacea New Strains(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年18期
Page:
63-66
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Drought and Heat Resistances for Festuca arundinacea New Strains
Author(s):
YANG Chun-yanZHANG WenZHONG LiWU Jia-hai
Guizhou Institute of Prataculture,Dushan,Guizhou 558200
Keywords:
Festuca arundinaceanew strainsdrought and heat resistances
PACS:
S 688.4
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking 11 Festuca arundinacea varieties as test materials,in contrast of ‘Fawn’(introduced variety) and ‘Shangnong’,the brown rate,death rate,content of total chlorophyll,chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b content,free proline content and cell membrane permeability changes of physiological index of Festuca arundinacea under drought and heat stresse were determinated and observed,evaluation of drought resistance of each variety were studied.The results showed a significant difference between new stains to drought and heat tolerances were:‘I112’>‘J168’>‘F113’>‘D78’>‘J172’>‘D73’>‘B166’>‘D76’>‘Shangnong’>‘B29’>‘B169’>‘J174’>‘Fawn’.These results would give a valid references for new variety breeding.

References:

[1]   黎裕.作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(1):91-99.
[2]   余玲,王彦荣,Garnett T.紫花苜蓿不同品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].草业学报,2006(6):75-85.
[3]   谢贤健,兰代萍,白景文.三种野生岩生草本植物的抗旱性综合评价[J].草业学报,2009(8):75-80.
[4]   何玮,范彦,王琳,等.三峡库区野生红三叶苗期抗旱性灰色关联分析[J].草业学报,2009(6):255-259.
[5]   李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[6]   高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].西安:世界地图出版社,2000.
[7]   张治安,张美善,蔚荣海.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004.
[8]   昌西.植物对干旱逆境的生理适应机制研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(18):7549-7551.
[9]   宋松泉,王彦荣.植物对干旱胁迫的分子反应[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1037-1044.
[10] 彭立新,李德伞,束怀瑞.植物在渗透胁迫下的渗透调节作用[J].天津农业科学,2002,8(1):41-43.
[11] 孟繁静,刘适宏,苏业瑜.植物生理生化[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995. 
[12] 陈颖,谢寅峰,沈惠娟.银杏幼苗对水分胁迫的生理响应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(2):55-58.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-14