|Table of Contents|

Study on Physiological and Preservation Effect of Antirrhinum majus Cut Flower(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年09期
Page:
154-159
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Physiological and Preservation Effect of Antirrhinum majus Cut Flower
Author(s):
ZHANG Yu-yu1; 2; LI Jing1; 2; WU Xu1; 2; YAO Li-yuan1; 2; HUA Jin-zhu1; 2
1.Department of Agriculture，Kunming College，Kunming，Yunnan 650214；
2.Urban Modern Agriculture Engineering Research Center in Yunnan Province,Kunming，Yunnan 650214
Keywords:
Antirrhinum majus; exterior quality; internal substances; preservation; physiology
PACS:
S 681.9
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking Antirrhinum majus cut flower as material，using 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate，citric acid，salt，sucrose，solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate，silver nitrate as preservatives，the effect of different preservatives on the exterior qualities (vase-life，flower diameter，fresh basis，water absorption，transpiration) and interior compositions (geniposide in anthocyanidin，cell membrane permeability，soluble sugar content，soluble protein content，content of vitamin C) of Antirrhinum majus were studied，in order to provide a reference for preservation of cut flower.The results showed that in the preservation experiment of Antirrhinum majus cut flower，the mixture of 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate (200 mg/L)+sucrose (3%)+citric acid (150 mg/L)+solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate (75 mg/L) could produce the best preservation effect；compared with CK，the preservation could prolong the life of cut-flower 9 days more (approximately 60%)；4 days delayed to bloom stage；at the 21th day of vase，fresh basis increased 26 g more；equilibrium value of moisture was 1.9 g higher.In the aspect of the change of cell membrane permeability，at the 21th day of vase，conductivity was 83.6% which was 8.1% less，maximum value of soluble sugar content was 0.1 g/100g (sample) higher and content of vitamin C was 44.2839 mg/100g (sample) higher when compared with CK.

References:

[1]杨先芬.花卉施肥技术手册[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001.

[2]赵梦.提高鲜切花品质的关键—鲜切花保鲜处理[J].温室园艺，2001(3):51-53.

[3]刁留彦,刘军.几种预处理液对马蹄莲切花的保鲜效应[J].四川农业大学学报,2007,25(1):113-116.

[4]谷战英,王润.香石竹鲜切花家庭常用保鲜液配方的筛选[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2009,29(6):145-148.

[5]Weiss D，Halevy A H.Stamens and gibberellin in the regulation of corolla pigmentation and growth in Petunia hybrid[J].Planta,1989,179(1):89-96.

[6]Ryypp A，Repo T,Vapaavuori E.Development of freezing tolerance in roots and shoots of scots pine seedlings at nonfreezing temperatures[J].Canadian J Forest Research,1998,28:557-565

[7]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.

[8]薛秋华,林如.月季切花衰老与含水量、膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的关系[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):304-308.

[9]冯晓迎.百子莲切花保鲜及低温贮藏的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.

[10]陈丹生,王精明,丁有雄.鲜切花的衰老与保鲜(综述)[J].亚热带植物科学,2004,33(1):73-76.

[11]姜微波,孙自然,于梁,等.低温贮藏结合蔗糖处理对唐菖蒲切花的影响[J].园艺学报,1989,16(1):63-67.

[12]姜微波,孙自然,于梁,等.采收时花序的发育程度对唐菖蒲切花的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1988(5):18-21.

[13]姜微波,孙自然,于梁,等.蔗糖溶液对唐菖蒲切花保鲜的影响[J].北京农业大学学报,1988,14(4):435-440.

[14]李宪章.花的衰老与切花保鲜[J].植物学通报,1994,21(4):26-32．

[15]高勇.月季切花瓶插期生理变化与衰老关系的研究[J].园艺学报,1990,17(1):71-75.

[16]高琼,吕炯璋.STS预处理对切花金鱼草瓶插生理的影响[J].山西农业大学学报,2011(1):59-62.

[17]孙正海,黄海泉,辛培尧,等.中药材浸提液对金鱼草瓶插寿命的影响[C].中国园艺学会2010年学术年会论文摘要集,2010.

[18]胡绪兰编译.切花保鲜新技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996:78-80.

[19]安华明,陈力耕,樊卫国,等.高等植物中维生素C的功能、合成及代谢研究进展[J].植物学通报,2004,21(5):608-617.


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-25