|Table of Contents|

Physiological Differences of Different Chinese Cabbage Varieties on Cadmium Stress(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年08期
Page:
9-12
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological Differences of Different Chinese Cabbage Varieties on Cadmium Stress
Author(s):
ZHANG Ju-ping1JIAO Xin-ju1CUI Wen-peng1DU Xiao-hua2
1.College of Forestry,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang,Henan 471003;
2.School of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture,Henan Institute of Science and Technology,Xinxiang,Henan 453003
Keywords:
cadmiumChinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis)physiological differencestolerance
PACS:
S 634.303.4
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking ten cultivars of Chinese cabbage as materials,a hydroponic experiment was carried out to study the impact of Cd stress under 5 μmol/L,to exploring the physiological and biochemical responses and cadmium resistance of different Chinese cabbage cultivars.The results showed that the growth of all the ten cultivars of Chinese cabbage were inhibited under Cd stress,of which ‘Huaguan’ was least affected.The MDA content of ‘Sijiqing’,‘Kangre 605’,‘Huaguani’ and ‘Yunong No.1’ decreased.Except for ‘Sijiqing’ and ‘Huaguan’,the content of ascorbic acid increased in other cultivars,in which ‘Shanghaijimaocai’ increased the most.The chlorophyll content reduced in other cultivars,except for ‘Huaguan’.SOD activity increased in ‘Sijiqing’,‘Huaguan’ and ‘Shanghaijimaocai’.CAT activity decreased in ‘Sijiqing’,‘Pingyou No.1’,‘Huaguan’ and ‘Shanghaijimaocai’.The proline content increased in ‘Sijiqing’,‘Kangre 605’,‘Huaguan’,‘Yuanzhongsiyueman’,‘Shanghaijimaocai’ and ‘Yunong No.1’.The physiological and biochemical response and the tolerance to Cd varied with different cultivars of Chinese cabbage.Among them the tolerance of ‘Sijiqing’,‘Huaguan’ and ‘Shanghaijimaocai ’were greater.

References:

[1]杜应琼,何江华,陈俊坚,.铅、镉和铬在叶类蔬菜中的积累及对其生长的影响[J].园艺学报,2003,30(1):51-55.

[2]方晓航,曾晓雯,于方明,.Cd 胁迫对白菜生理特征及元素吸收的影响研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(1):25-29.

[3]李德明,朱祝军,钱琼秋.白菜镉积累基因型差异研究[J].园艺学报,2004,31(1):97-98.

[4]Scheifler R,Vaufleury A GBadot P M.Transfer of cadmium from plant leaves and vegetable flour to the snail helix aspersabioaccumulation and effects[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2002,53:148-153.

[5]Cuypers APlusquin MRemans T,et al.Cadmium stressan oxidative challenge[J].Bio Metals,2010,23(5):927-940.

[6]刘志华,伊晓云,王火焰,.不同品种大白菜苗期吸收积累镉的差异研究[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):987-993.

[7]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.

[8]Sánchez-Rodríguez ERubio-Wilhelmi MCervilla L Metal.Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants[J].Plant Science,2010,178(1):30-40.

[9]Chen H Y,Yen G C.Free radicalsantioxidant defenses and human health[J].Nutrition Sciences Journal1998,23(1):105-121.

[10]杨广东,朱祝军.不同光照条件下缺镁对黄瓜生长及活性氧清除系统的影响[J].园艺学报,2001,28(5):430-434.

[11]刘亚云,孙红斌,陈桂珠,.秋茄幼苗对多氯联苯污染的生理生态响应[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):746-754.

[12]Chaoui A,Mazhoudi S,Ghorbal M H.Cadmium and zinc induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on antioxidant enzyme activities in bean(Phase olusulgaris L.) [J].Plant Science,1997,127(2):139-147.


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-25