|Table of Contents|

Impact of Different Photoperiods on the Morphological Index,Quality and Absorptive Amount to Ions of Lettuce in Fluorescent Light Source(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年15期
Page:
24-28
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Impact of Different Photoperiods on the Morphological Index,Quality and Absorptive Amount to Ions of Lettuce in Fluorescent Light Source
Author(s):
MAO Jin-zhu12QIU Quan2ZHANG Fang23LI Ning24HU Yue-gao1XUE Xu-zhang2
1.College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193;
2.National Research Center for Intelligent Agricultural Equipments,Beijing 100097;
3.Northwest Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment Ecology of Ministry of Education,Xi’an University of Technology,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710048;
4.College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715
Keywords:
lettucephotoperiodmorphologyproductionqualityabsorptive amount to ions
PACS:
S 636.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking ‘American Dasusheng’ and ‘Hongkong Boli’ two scattered lettuce varieties as materials,three photoperiods(12 h,16 h,20 h) were set,the impact of different photoperiods on lettuce’s morphological index,quality and absorptive amount to ions were conducted.The results showed that the photoperiod extension could improve lettuce’s height,length and width of the seventh leaf,aboveground fresh weight,root fresh weight and shoot dry weight significantly;the extension of photoperiod could increase soluble sugar content and reduce nitrate content of lettuce significantly in which there was a negative correlation between soluble sugar content and nitrate content,and the change of protein content had no significance;the extension of photoperiod could result in the significant increase of absorptive amount of lettuce to nitrate ions,phosphate ions and potassium ions,and the increase of absorptive amount to ammonia ions was not significant.

References:

[1]王小菁.我国光形态建成研究回顾[J].植物学通报,2003,20(4):407-415.
[2]Ward J M,Cufr C A,Denzel M A,et al.The Dof transcription factor obp3 modulates phytochrome and cryptochrome signaling in arabidopsis[J].Plant Cell,2005(17):475-485.
[3]苏文华,张光飞,李秀华,等.光强和光质对灯盏花生长与总黄酮量影响的研究[J].中草药,2006,37(8):1244-1247.
[4]焦雨歆,赵琦,王雪英,等.环境因子对植物叶绿体结构的影响[J].生物技术通报,2008(2):5-10.
[5]楚晓真,卢钦灿,董鹏昊,等.生菜水培技术研究[J].现代农业科技,2007(23):15-16.
[6]Kitaya Y,Niu G H,Kozai T,et al.Photosynthetic photon flux,photoperiod,and CO2concentration affect growth and morphology of lettuce plug transplants[J].Hort Science,1998,33(6):988-991.
[7]Gaudreau L,Charbonneau J.Photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux influence growth and quality of greenhouse grown lettuce[J].Hort Science,1994,29(11):1285-1289.
[8]Koontz H V,Prince R P.Effect of 16 and 24 hours daily radiation (light) on lettuce growth[J].Hort Science,1986(21):123-124.
[9]周晚来,刘文科,杨其长.光对蔬菜硝酸盐累积的影响及其机理[J].华北农学报,2011(S-2):125-130.
[10]Scaife A,Schloemer S.The diurnal pattern of nitrate uptake and  reduction by spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) [J].Annals of Botany,1994,73(3):337-343.
[11]孙兴祥,王健,周毅,等.不同氮素水平对菠菜生长和品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2005,28(3):126-128.[12]李英丽,赵斌,方正,等.不同类型蔬菜中矿质元素含量的比较研究[J].北方园艺,2009(12):67-68.
[13]李合生,陈翠莲,洪玉枝.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[14]严妍.温度和光周期对水培生菜生长的影响及生长模型初探[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
[15]田霄鸿,李生秀.几种蔬菜对硝态氮、铵态氮的相对吸收能力[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2000,6(2):194-201.[16]张树清,魏小平.蔬菜作物对硝铵态氮吸收能力比较研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):77-84.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-12