|Table of Contents|

Drought Resistance of Four Plant Species in Ecological Regeneration on  Mining Area Under Drought Stress(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年12期
Page:
61-64
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Drought Resistance of Four Plant Species in Ecological Regeneration on  Mining Area Under Drought Stress
Author(s):
YU Li-lin12PEI Zong-ping12KONG Jing12TU Yong-cheng12PAN Ling-xiao12
1.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116;
2.School of Environmental and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116
Keywords:
ecological restorationdrought stressdrought resistant capabilityfuzzy membership function analysisgrey correlation analysis
PACS:
Q 945.78
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to research the mechanism of drought resistance of different plants under drought stress,4 kinds of plant species that typical in the ecological regeneration on arid region,including Sedum spectabile Boreau, Astragalus adsurgens Pall,Medicago sativa L. and Poa annua L. were selected,and changes of 6 drought resistance indexes including the relative water content,relative conductivity,chlorophyll content,contents of proline,malondialdehyde and soluble carbohydrate were measured with potted controlled water.Then the fuzzy membership function analysis to integrated evaluate plant drought resistance were used,and the grey correlation analysis to analyze the association between 6 drought indicators and plant drought resistance were adopted.The results showed that,the drought resistant capability of 4 arid region plants was in order of Sedum spectabile Boreau>Poa annua L.>Medicago sativa L.>Astragalus adsurgens Pall,and the relational degree order about each index of drought resistance and average subordinate function values was:chlorophyll content (0.9727),relative water content (0.9387),soluble carbohydrate (0.8314),malondialdehyde content (0.7940),relative conductivity (0.6320),content of proline (0.4528).So,chlorophyll content,relative water content and soluble carbohydrate were the most sensitive indexes to drought environment and can be accepted as the indexes of evaluating and selecting the drought resistant plant species for ecological regeneration on mining area.

References:

[1]刘刚.矿山自然生态环境治理技术与治理方案[J].西部探矿工程,2009(6):122-126.
[2]张俊云,周德培,李绍.岩石边坡生态种植基试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(2):239-242.
[3]邹琪.植物生理实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:159-164.
[4]黎裕.作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(1):91-99.
[5]徐云刚,詹亚光.植物抗旱机理及相关基因研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2009(2):11-17.
[6]颜淑云,周志宇,邹丽娜,等.干旱胁迫对紫穗槐幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(1):139-145.[7]BrayE A.Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana[J].Journal Experimental Botany,2004,55(44):2331-2341.
[8]Quarrie S A,Stojanovi C J,Peki C S,et al.Improving drought resistance in small-grained cereals:A case study,progress and prospects[J].Plant Growth Regulation,1999,29(1/2):1-21.
[9]庄丽,陈亚宁,陈明,等.模糊隶属法在塔里木河荒漠植物抗旱性评价中的应用[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(3):368-371.
[10]杨俊,马健,王婷婷,等.5种荒漠植物抗旱性及其与抗旱指标相关性的定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(6):143-146.
[11]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:15-16,228-231,210-211.
[12]李合生,孙群,赵世杰,等.植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:134-137.
[13]吴克宁,杨扬,吕巧灵.模糊综合评判在烟草生态适宜性评价中的应用[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):631-634. [14]周江,裴宗平,胡佳佳,等.干旱胁迫下3种岩石边坡生态修复植物的抗旱性[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(3):440-444.
[15]张鹤山,张德罡,刘晓静,等.灰色关联度分析法对不同处理下草坪质量的综合评判[J].草业科学,2007,24(11):73-76.
[16]赖运平,李俊,张泽全,等.小麦苗期抗旱相关形态指标的灰色关联度分析[J].麦类作物学报,2009,29(6):1055-1059.
[17]薛彦斌,秦华,张科.3种藤本地被植物抗旱性比较[J].中国农学通报,2010(9):239-243.
[18]李云霞,张建生,吴永华,等.5种景天科地被植物抗旱性比较研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010(2):183-186.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-19