|Table of Contents|

Comparison on Dust Detention of Twenty Gardening Afforestation Trees(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2013年12期
Page:
48-50
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison on Dust Detention of Twenty Gardening Afforestation Trees
Author(s):
ZHU Feng-rong; ZHOU Jun-li
School of Life Science and Technology，Xinxiang University，Xinxiang，Henan 453003
Keywords:
afforestation trees; dust detention; comparison
PACS:
S 688
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to reveal the dust detention laws of city green trees in An-yang，20 afforestation trees were selected in three functional districts，and the amount of dust detention was analyzed.The results showed that the capture ability of particulate pollution by Eriobotrya japonica, Buxus sinica and Ailanthus altissima were better, Salix babylonica，Berberis thunbergii cv.atropurpurea，Cercis chinensis Bunqe，Albizia julibrissin Durazz.and Fraxinus chinensis were poorer，Platanus acerifolia Willd.，Sophora japonica Linn.，Populus tomentosa Carr，Prunus cerasifera，Ginkgo biloba L.，Buxus megistophylla，Broussonetia papyrifera，Pyracantha fortuneana，Koelreuteria paniculata，Photinia davidsoniae，Lagerstroemia indica and Ligustum lucidum Ait were at the intermediate level.As far as unifoliate dust detention，Eriobotrya japonica，Populus tomentosa Carr，Cercis chinensis Bunqe，Platanus acerifolia Willd were stronger，Broussonetia papyrifera，Ailanthus altissima，Lagerstroemia indica，Pyracantha fortuneana，Prunus cerasifera，Buxus megistophylla，Ligustum lucidum Ait，Sophora japonica Linn.，Salix babylonica，Koelreuteria paniculata were at intermediate level，Ginkgo biloba L.，Berberis thunbergii cv.atropurpurea，Albizia julibrissin Durazz.，Fraxinus chinensis，Photinia davidsoniae and Buxus sinica were poorer.

References:

[1]Koch K,Bhushan B,Barthlott W.Multifunctional surface structures of plants:An inspiration for biomimetics[J].Progress in Materials Science,2009,54:137-178.
[2]王会霞,石辉,李秧秧.城市绿化植物叶片表面特征对滞尘能力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010，21(12):3077-3082.
[3]张莉.南京常见道路绿化树种的环境效益研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2007.
[4]Shen Q,Ding H G,Zhong L.Characterization of the surface properties of persimmon leaves by FT-Raman spectroscopy and wicking technique[J].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2004,37:133-136.[5]李海梅,刘霞.青岛市城阳区主要园林树种叶片表皮形态与滞尘量的关系[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(10):1659-1662．
[6]Woodruff T J,Grillo J,Schoendorf K C.The relationship between selected cause of post neonatal infant mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,1997,105(6):608-612.
[7]Arden P C,Richard L V,Lovett E G,et al.Heart rate variability associated with particulate air pollution[J].American Heart Journal,1999,138(5):890-899.
[8]冯朝阳,高吉喜,田美荣,等.京西门头沟区自然植被滞尘能力及效益研究[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(5):155-159.
[9]郑少文,邢国明,李军,等.北方常见绿化树种的滞尘效应[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(4):383-387.
[10]陈玮,何兴元,张粤,等.东北地区城市针叶树冬季滞尘效应研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(12):2113-2116. [11]姜红卫.苏州高速公路绿化减噪吸硫滞尘效果初探[D].南京:南京农业大学,2005.
[12]吴中能,于一苏,边艳霞.合肥主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究初报[J].安徽农业科学,2001,29(6):780-783.
[13]韩敬,陈广艳,杨银萍.临沂市滨河大道主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J].湖南农业科学,2009(6):141-142. [14]邱媛,管东生,宋巍巍,等.惠州城市植被的滞尘效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(6):2455-2462.
[15]吴耀兴,康文星,郭清和,等.广州市城市森林对大气污染物吸收净化的功能价值[J].林业科学,2009,45(5):42-48.
[16]刘光立.垂直绿化及其生态效益研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2002.
[17]宋丽华,赖生渭,石常凯.银川市几种针叶绿化树种的春季滞尘能力比较[J].中国城市林业,2008,6(3):57-59.[18]俞学如.南京市主要绿化树种叶面滞尘特征及其与叶面结构的关系[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[19]黄慧娟.保定常见绿化树种滞尘效应及尘污染对其光合特性影响的研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2008.
[20]史晓丽.北京市行道树固碳释氧滞尘效益的初步研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-19