Analysis on Foliage Sulfur Content in Several Afforestation Trees(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:

2012年24期

Page:

61-63

Research Field:

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Analysis on Foliage Sulfur Content in Several Afforestation Trees

Author(s):

ZHU Feng-rong¹; ZHU Nan²

1.School of Life Science and Technology，Xinxiang University，Xinxiang，Henan 453003;

2.The Renmin Park of Xinxiang，Xinxiang，Henan 453000

Keywords:

afforestation trees; foliage; dulfur content

PACS:

S 688

DOI:

-

Abstract:

In order to reveal the difference of foliage sulfur content of common green trees in Zhenjiang，11 afforestation trees of Ligustum lucidum，China wingnut，Populus canadensis，Prunus ceraifera，Lagerstroemia indica，Buxus megistophylla，Viburnum awabuki，Lorpetalum chinense，Ligustrun quihoui，Buxus sinica，Berberis thunbergii var.atropurpurea were selected in four sampling sites of industrial pack(GYQ)，traffic area(JTQ)，Ganlu temple(GLS) and Nanshan scenio spb(NSQ)，and the sulfur content of leaves were analyzed.The results indicated that there was obvious difference on the amount of foliage sulfur content for different tree species in different sites，the foliage sulfur content near GYQ and JTQ functional area was more higher than those near GLS and NSQ functional area.Foliage sulfur content of Ligustum lucidum，China wingnut，Populus canadensis，Prunus ceraifera，Lagerstroemia indica，Buxus megistophylla，Viburnum awabuki，Lorpetalum chinense，Ligustrun quihoui，Buxus sinica，Berberis thunbergii?var.atropurpurea were respectively 0.247%，0.151%，0.863%，0.135%，0.128%，0.132%，0.271%，0.420%，0.401%，0.124% and 0.136%.Tree species were assorted three classifications at the basis of foliage sulfur content，Populus canadensis，Lorpetalum chinense and Ligustrun quihoui were classified to the first category and sulfur content was the higher，the second category includes Viburnum awabuki and Ligustum lucidum，for them there was medium content.China wingnut，Berberis thunbergii var.atropurpurea，Prunus ceraifera，Buxus megistophylla，Lagerstroemia indica and Buxus sinica were classified to the third category and sulfur content was the poorer.

References:

[1] 何培明 , 孔国辉 . 叶片组织结构特征对氯气、二氧化硫的抗性研究 [J]. 生态学报 ,1986,6(1):19-33.

[2]陶玲,任珺,杜忠,等.SO₂对兰州市主要绿化树种形态症状的影响[J].环境科学与技术,2009,32(6):34-37.

[3]孙旭映,尉元明,庞朝云,等.兰州城市大气污染物分布特征分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(6):15-18.

[4]孔国辉,陆耀东,刘世忠,等.大气污染对38种木本植物的伤害特征[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(4):319-328.

[5]廖飞勇,何平.SO₂熏气对油桐叶片细胞膜脂组成和叶绿体超微结构的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2004,40(1):42-44.

[6]李向应,王文凤,李彦慧,等.SO₂对4种李属彩叶树木膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报，2007,30(6):25-28.

[7]温达志,孔国辉,张德强,等.30种园林植物对短期大气污染的生理生态反应[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3):311-317.

[8]李海亮,赵庆芳,王秀春,等.兰州市大气污染对绿化植物生理特性的影响[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(1):55-57,60.

[9]李珍珍.沈阳市中环路树木含硫量及其污染状况评价[J].辽宁大学学报(自然科学版),2001,28(2):170-173.

[10]黄银晓,林舜华,韩荣庄,等.北京主要绿化植物和土壤对大气中硫的积累特点及指示、净化作用[J].植物学报,1990,32(5):380-389.

[11]丛日春.试论城市林业在我国城市发展中的地位[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(2):1-10.

[12]邱媛,管东生,陈华,等.惠州绿化乔木叶片及其叶面降尘对大气SO₂污染的生物监测[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):317-322.

[13]张德强,褚国伟,余清发,等.园林绿化植物对大气二氧化硫和氟化物污染的净化能力及修复功能[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(4):336-340.

[14]鲁敏,李英杰.部分园林植物对大气污染物吸收净化能力的研究[J].山东建筑工程学院学报,2002,17(2):45-49.

[15]张家洋,朱南,李慧,等.10种常见绿化树种叶片含硫量差异性分析[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，48(4):115-120.

[16]刘崇群,陈国安,曹淑卿,等.我国南方土壤硫素状况和硫肥施用[J].土壤学报,1981,18(2):185-191.

[17]林舜华,黄银晓,蒋高明,等.海河流域植物硫素含量特征的研究[J].生态学报,1994,14(3):235-242.

[18]张汝国.珠江口红树林硫的累积和循环研究[J].热带亚热带土壤科学,1996,5(2):67-73.

[19]Huang H.Effect of the N6 (benzyl) adenine on the degradation rate of the ABA in wheat leaves[J].Plant Physiol,1987,13(3):321-329.

[20]Ambler J R,Morgan P W,Jordan W R.Amountos of Zeatin and Zeatin riboside in Xylem，sap of senescent and no seneseent[J].Cropscie,2003,32:411-419.

[21]Ouatrao R S,Dvies P J.Plant hormone and their role in plant growth and development[J].Exp Bot,1997,23:914-920

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions