|Table of Contents|

The Relationship between Distribution Characters of Fine Root of Ziziphus jujube cv.Lizao Plantation and Soil Nutrients in Hilly Loess Regions(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年23期
Page:
185-188
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Relationship between Distribution Characters of Fine Root of Ziziphus jujube cv.Lizao Plantation and Soil Nutrients in Hilly Loess Regions
Author(s):
WEI Guo-liang1; WANG De-xiang2; WANG You-ke3; LIN Yu-yang4; YANG-Tao5
1.College of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry,Qinghai University，Xining，Qinghai 810016;
2.College of Forestry，Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100;
3.Institute of Soiland Water Conservation,Ministry of Water Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100；
4.Forest Bureau of Yanbian County，Panzhihua，Sichuan 617100；
5.Institute for Control Sand of Shaanxi Province,Yulin,Shaanxi 719000
Keywords:
loess hilly regions; distribution characters of fine root; Ziziphus jujube cv.Lizao; soil nutrients
PACS:
S 718.55+1.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The space distribution characters on the biomass，root length density and specific root length of fine root of Ziziphus jujube cv.Lizao plantation，and the relationship between soil nutrients by layered and sectional mining method in Hilly Loess Regions were studied.The results showed that both fine roots root biomass and root length density of ?Ziziphus jujube cv.Lizao decreased with an increase of horizontal distance and soil depth.Specific root length decreased in the vertical direction within the range of 0~40 cm soil depth increase，while increased with the horizontal distance increase within the range of 0~90 cm in horizontal direction.The average content (in addition to all P outside) of soil nutrient was higher than the other in 0~20 cm soil depth and in 0~30 cm soil layer horizontal distance.Correlation results showed that there had a significant correlation (R2=0.6472,0.6869) among the absorption stud，root length density and soil nutrients in the effectiveness，especially the content of effective K,available N promoted roots’ growth significantly.The correlation of specific root length and soil nutrient content was not obvious.

References:

[1]Vogt K A，Vogt D J，Moone E E，et a1.Estimating Doouglas-fir fine root biomass and production from living bark and starch[J].Can J For Res,1985(15):177-179.

[2]Gill R A，Jackson R B.Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems[J].New Phytol，2000,147:13-31.

[3]范世华,李培芝,王力华,等.明.杨树人工林下根系的氮素循环与动态特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):387-390.

[4]刘菀秋,罗良兴,刘亮英,等.退化红壤重建森林初期细根特征及其作用机理研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1735-1739.

[5]李勇,徐晓琴,朱显谟,等.黄土高原植物根系强化土壤渗透力的有效性[J].科学通报,1992(4):366-369.

[6]李勇,吴钦孝,朱显谟,等.黄土高原植物根系提高土壤抗冲性能的研究I.油松人工林根系对土壤抗冲性的增强效应[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):1-5.

[7]Norby R J，Ledford J，Reilly C D,et al.Fine-root production dominates responses of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment[J].PNAS,2004,101(29):9689-9693.

[8]King J S，Albaugh T J，Allen H L,et al.Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine [J].New Phytol,2002,154:389-398.

[9]Gaudinski J B，Trumbore S E，Davidson E A,et al.The age of fine root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon [J].Oecologia，2001,129:420-429.

[10]Burton A J，Pregitzer K S，Hendrick R L.Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forest [J].Oecologia,2000,125:389-399.

[11]王进鑫,王迪海,刘广全.刺槐和侧柏人工林有效根系密度分布规律研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(12):2208-2214.

[12]魏国良,汪有科,王得祥,等.梨枣人工林有效吸收根系密度分布规律研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(1):133-138.

[13]Smit A，Bengougha G，Eingels C，et al.Root methods:ahandbook [M].Berlin:Springer Verlag,2000:1-32.

[14]常经武.枣的栽培与加工[M].西安:西安地图出版社,1993.

[15]折红燕,罗于洋,张海龙,等.大青沟水曲柳、蒙古栎、大果榆苗木根系生物量与土壤养分及pH值关系的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(12):183-189.

[16]岳庆玲,常庆瑞,刘京.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同人工林地土壤肥力变化研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(5):99-101.

[17]王颖,曹丽,张春华.苹果梨树盘内土壤养分状况的调查[J].北方园艺,2005(2):22-24.

[18]程云环,韩有志,王庆成,等.落叶松人工林细根动态与土壤资源有效性关系研究[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(3):403-410.

[19]杨玉盛,陈光水,林鹏,等.格氏栲天然林与人工林细根生物量、季节动态及净生产力[J].生态学报，2003,23(9):1719-1731.

[20]廖利平,邓仕坚,于小军,等.不同连栽代数杉木人工林细根生长、分布与营养物质分泌特征[J].生态学报,2001,21(4)：569-573.

[21]梅莉,王政权,韩有志,等.水曲柳根系生物量、比根长和根长密度的分布格局[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(1):1-4.

[22]安慧,韦兰英,刘勇,等.黄土丘陵区油松人工林和白桦天然林细根垂直分布及其与土壤养分的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(4):611-619.

[23]Eissenstat D M，Wells C E，Yanai R D，et al.Building roots in a changing environment：implications for root longevity[J].New Phytol,2000,147：33-42.

[24]周玮,周运超.马尾松细根与土壤养分含量研究[J].浙江林业科技,2009,29(6):6-10.

[25]Espeleta F，Donovan L A.Fine root demography and morphology in response to soil resources availability among xeric and mesic sandhill tree species [J].Funct Ecol,2002,16(1):113.


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-31