|Table of Contents|

Root Distribution Characteristic of P.cornutum(L.) Gaertn and P.dolabratum Maxim in Mu Us Sandy Land(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年08期
Page:
20-24
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Root Distribution Characteristic of P.cornutum(L.) Gaertn and P.dolabratum Maxim in Mu Us Sandy Land
Author(s):
HUANG Xiu-meiHAO Li-zhenWANG Huai-dongPANG Jie
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Key Laboratory of Wild Peculiar Vegetable Recourse and Germplasm Enhancement,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010019
Keywords:
Mu Us Sandy LandCruciferaePugionium gaertnP.cornutumP.dolabratumroots
PACS:
S 647
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The distribution characteristics and the horizontal roots spatial distribution and the soil moisture around the root system of P.cornutum and P.dolabratum in Mu Us Sandy Land were studied,by using the methods of digging out whole roots.The results showed that round the biennial roots system of P.cornutum and P.dolabratum, the soil moisture were (3.13±0.46)% and (1.90±0.68)% respectively;around the annual roots system,the soil moisture were (2.68±0.11)% and (2.50±0.45)% respectively.The primary roots of P.cornutum and P.dolabratum were all nearly vertical,the horizontal roots system were extremely developed,but number less.The tap-root length of P.cornutum and P.dolabratum of biennial all were 120 cm;the longest horizontal roots were 380 cm and 400 cm respectively;the length of total horizontal roots were 1 590 cm and 3 340 cm respectively;the maximal spacial distribution all were from 20 to 40 cm in the soil depth,from 0 to 40 cm in the radius range.The roots’ adaptive mechanism of P.cornutum and P.dolabratum had strong tap-roots to absorb more water.P.dolabratum had strongger adaptive than P.cornutum to low soil moisture content.

References:

[1]王政权,郭大立.根系生态学[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1213-1216.

[2]王进鑫,王迪海,刘广全.刺槐和侧柏人工林有效根系密度分布规律研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(12):2208-2214.
[3]云雷,毕华兴,马雯静,等.晋西黄土区林草复合系统刺槐根系分布特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(2):151-155.
[4]张国盛,王林和,李玉灵,等.毛乌素沙地臭柏根系分布及根量[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(4):378-383.
[5]张莉,吴斌,丁国栋,等.毛乌素沙地沙柳与柠条根系分布特征对比[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(3):158-161.
[6]杨峰,王文科,刘立,等.毛乌素沙地沙柳根系与土壤水分特征的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(26):16050-16052.
[7]康博文,刘建军,孙建华,等.陕北毛乌素沙漠黑沙蒿根系分布特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):119-123.
[8]木巴热克,阿尤普,陈亚宁,等.极端干旱环境下的胡杨细根分布与土壤特征[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1449-1458.
[9]赵一之.沙芥属的分类校正及其区系分析[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版),1999,30(2):197-199.
[10]赵一之.内蒙古珍稀濒危植物图谱[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1992:30.[11]张宇清,朱清科,齐实,等.梯田生物埂几种灌木根系的垂直分布特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(2):34-38.
[12]Fitter A.Characteristics and functions of root systems.In:Waisel,Y.;Eshel,A.;KafkafiI,U.(Eds.) Plant roots:the hidden half [M].New York:Marcel Dekker,1996:1-20.
[13]吕贻忠,胡克林,李保国.毛乌素沙地不同沙丘土壤水分的时空变异[J].土壤学报,2006,43(1):152-154.
[14]杨冬艳,郝丽珍,王萍,等.干旱胁迫对沙芥与斧翅沙芥膜脂过氧化及膜脂组分的影响[J].庆祝中国园艺学会创建80周年暨第11次全国委员代表大会论文摘要集,2009.
[15]张晓蕾,曾凡江,刘波,等.塔干沙漠南缘骆驼刺幼苗根系生长和分布对不同灌溉量的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1459-1466.
[16]Eissenstat D M.Costs and benefits of construction roots of small diameter[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,1992,15:763-782.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-30