|Table of Contents|

Study on Growth and Resource Usage in an Intercrop of Chinese Cabbage and Beets(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年04期
Page:
4-8
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Growth and Resource Usage in an Intercrop of Chinese Cabbage and Beets
Author(s):
XIE Ming-ming1; 2; ZHANG Li-feng1; 2; LIU Yu-hua1; 2
1.College of Agronomy,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000；
2.Zhangbei Agricultural Resource and Ecological Environment Key Field Research Station,Ministry of Agriculture,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 076450
Keywords:
intercrop; light transmittance of plant; leaf area index; economic benefit; Chinese cabbage; beets
PACS:
S 634.104+.6
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Through setting up different intercropping density of Chinese cabbage and beets,monitor the leaf area index of composite group,light transmittance,and yield of each crop.The results showed that intercrop Chinese cabbage display slant the effect lied to its advantage of fast-growing,intercrop beets suffer the stress from close cover of cabbage,and its leaf area index were always lower than sole crop beets in the growth period；after cabbage harvest intercrop beets improved the light intercepting rate depended on the canopy space automatic spread,so as to promote photosynthetic compensatory production in later growth period；in 2 line Chinese cabbage∶1 line beets intercrop(BT1),the yield of intercrop Chinese cabbage significantly advantage was 26.7% for ‘expect’ yield,the yield of intercrop beets significantly advantage was 34.0% for ‘expect’ yield；in 2 line Chinese cabbage∶2 line beets intercrop(BT2),the yield of intercrop Chinese cabbage and beets significantly advantage were 59.3% and 53.0% for ‘expect’ yield.The economic benefits of BT1 and BT2 intercropping group were increased by 10.2% and 23.7% than sole crop Chinese cabbage,by 91.5% and 115.1% than sole crop beets.Analysis showed that intercropping improved the using efficiency of soil and climate resource,the LER of BT1 intercrop was 1.29,and of BT2 was 1.56.

References:

[1]Awal M A,Koshi H,Ikeda T.Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy [J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2006,139 (1-2)：74-83.
[2]董宏懦,邓振镛.带田农业气候资源的利用[M].北京:气象出版社,1988:13-45.
[3]徐强,程智慧,卢涛,等.线辣椒/玉米套作对产量和品质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010(5):20-25.
[4]Jurik T W,Van K.Microenvironment of a corn-soybean-oat strip intercrop system [J].Field Crops Research,2004,90(2-3):335-349.
[5]阎旭东,王铮,岳明强,等.玉米-辣椒套作高产高效种植模式效益分析[J].河北农业科学,2010,14(2)：3-4.
[6]徐强,谢宝英,卢涛,等.线辣椒玉米套作的养分吸收利用及产量优势分析[J].园艺学报,2010,37(8):1247-1256. [7]叶优良.间作对氮素和水分利用的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学,2003. [8]刘树庆,张笑归,谢建治,等.河北坝上高原错季无公害蔬菜生产的环境标准与技术[J].生态环境,2005,14(3):372-377.
[9]马永胜,孙宇光,王立坤.半干旱区甜菜耗水规律试验研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2009,40(1):36-40.
[10]柏军华,王克如,初振东,等.叶面积测定方法的比较研究[J].石河子大学学报（自然科学版）,2005,23(2):216-218.
[11]李雁鸣,胡冰华,张建平,等.魔芋叶面积测定方法的初步研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2000,23(4):23-25.
[12]陶洪斌,林杉.打孔称重法与复印称重法和长宽校正法测定水稻叶面积的方法比较[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,42(3)：496-498.
[13]Reddy M S,Willey R W.Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearl Millet groundnut[J].Field Crops Research,1981(4):13-24.
[14]刘巽浩.耕作学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:117-120.
[15]浙江农业大学.耕作学[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1984:62-71.
[16]西北农业大学.耕作学[M].银川:宁夏人民出版社,1984:83-88.
[17]沈学年,刘巽浩.多熟种植[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1983:173-190.
[18]刘玉华,张立峰.不同种植方式土地利用效率的定量评价[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(1):57-60.
[19]同金霞,李新岗.枣粮间作的生态影响及效益分析[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(1):89-91.
[20]贺明荣,冷寿慈.粮果间作种植模式的资源利用与管理[J].生态学杂志,1994,13(6):7-10.
[21]李志欣,刘进余.枣粮间作复合种植对作物生态及产量的动态影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25(4):45-48. [22]孙郭立,马新明.棉麦套作不同种植方式棉田生态效应分析[J].生态学杂志,1996,15(4):6-9.
[23]李向东,杨铁钢,李彦鹏,等.麦棉多作套种循环农业模式的发展演变与效应分析[J].中国农学通报,2010,(19):294-299.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-26