|Table of Contents|

Effect of The Water Consumption Characteristics and Ornamental of Four Flowering Shrubs Under Water Stress(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年03期
Page:
63-66
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of The Water Consumption Characteristics and Ornamental of Four Flowering Shrubs Under Water Stress
Author(s):
WANG Yu-tao12LI Ji-yue23LIU Ping1
1.College of Forestry,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110866;
2.Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083;
3.College of Forestry,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510642
Keywords:
water stressflowering shrubwater consumption rateornamental
PACS:
S 685.99
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Using BP3400 Precision Balance etc.,water consumption rates and ornamental of Buddleja lindleyana,Viburnum sargentii,Weigela florida ‘Red Prince’ and Amygdalus persica f.duplex four main flowering shrubs in North China were studied.The results showed that diurnal variation curves of water consumption of four flowering shrubs were unimodal,and the daily highest water consumption rate of seedlings was in 10:00~14:00 in normal water supply,the ratio of daytime highest water consumption rate and daytime average water-consumption rate changed between 1.74 and 1.76.The water consumption of the seedlings decreased differently under different drought stress,and the daytime average water consumption rates of in serious drought stress decreased 96.6%,82.2%,88.9% and 95.8% respectively of those under normal water condition.In addition,ornamental of flowering shrubs had little changed under light water stress,for instance,B.lindleyana and A.persica f.duplex had been yellowing or falling.Four shrubs had been yellowing,curling and falling under moderate and serious stress,and A.persica f.duplex was the most serious,V.sargentii was the most light.

References:

[1]李新宇,赖娜娜,郄怡彬,等.北京市园林主要灌木单株耗水量比较研究[J].节水灌溉,2008(4):15-19.

[2]王玉涛,李吉跃.北方城市抗旱节水树种的筛选与评价[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2011:18-26.
[3]李吉跃,周平,招礼军.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1380-1386.
[4]招礼军,李吉跃,于界芬,等.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水日变化的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(3):42-47.[5]车文瑞,马履一,王瑞辉,等.北京3个园林观赏树种苗木耗水特性初探[J].浙江林学院学报,2008,25(5):609-613.
[6]李文华,刘广权,马松涛,等.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水和生长的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(1):61-65.
[7]李吉跃.太行山区主要造林树种耐旱特性的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,1990.
[8]曾凡江,Andrea Foetzki,李向义,等.策勒绿洲多枝柽柳灌溉前后水分生理指标变化的初步研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7):849-853.
[9]黄颜梅,张健,罗承德.树木抗旱性研究[J].四川农业大学学报,1997,15(1):49-54.
[10]彭致功,杨培岭,任树梅,等.再生水灌溉草坪观赏品质及其综合评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2006,11(5):81-87.
[11]招礼军.我国北方主要造林树种耗水特性及抗旱造林技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2003:72-77.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-25